PopAndSonGrows
Well-Known Member
OFF WITH UR HEAD LIBERAL BLASPHEMER!
It's too colorful. Sure it's red, but not in an American way
What Would an Evangelical Christian Country Be Like
- Thread starter Unclebaldrick
- Start date
It's too colorful. Sure it's red, but not in an American way
printer
Well-Known Member
"But I am in Canada."OFF WITH UR HEAD LIBERAL BLASPHEMER!
It's too colorful. Sure it's red, but not in an American way
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
it would be better for communion than grape juice.OFF WITH UR HEAD LIBERAL BLASPHEMER!
It's too colorful. Sure it's red, but not in an American way
the blood of christ and all
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
Ketchup is banned in school lunch programs in France
printer
Well-Known Member
Well after the U.S. renamed the french fry, something else, then thy had to do something.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Gay people shouldn't fight so hard for "the right" to have the state bless their marriage. It's not a right in that case, it becomes a state granted privilege that makes gay people as equally subservient as straight people.
If you remove the state from marriages (licensure et al) then it's just a freedom of association thing. Christians can marry people willing to marry them. Gay people can marry people willing to marry them. Everyone can leave others who don't behave like them alone as long as they are leaving them alone. Problem solved. The state can go "build the roads" then. (smirk)
The idea that state sanctioning is what makes a marriage needs to go away. Consensual agreements can be defined by those within the relationship. It's quite possible if the state butted the fuck out of peoples lives, a free market would emerge with templates for marriage agreements that would satisfy the varying relationships people willingly enter into. Freedom is the solution.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well they dont have to because they already won. Your bigoted bullshit, copied directly from racist bitch rawn pawl, lost
LOL
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
What did they win? How did they gain a right to be married when now they have to get permission via a license or some other state horse shittery just like hetero marriage slaves do?
I'm not sure you know what a right is. As an aside gay people shouldn't give up their rights in exchange for government granted privileges. They didn't "win" anything. They acquiesced.
Bonus question - Would you be in favor of forcing a jewish person to bake a cake for one of your nazi rallies ?
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
The pedo likes to compare gay people to nazis.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I'm not calling Uncle Buck, a pedo and you shouldn't either.
Forcing gay people to jump thru the same state hoops as hetero people isn't an act of protecting a right.
It's an act of taking a gay person's right to decide how they will run their life and replacing it with a license. That reduces a gay person's right to make their own choices, statist like you, which includes Nazi statists, often have little regard for a gay person's rights and you also confuse a right with a government licensed privilege.
Why are you like that ? That's a rhetorical question. I already know why.
Kindbud421
Well-Known Member
Apparently Christians don’t realize that they are only reading half the original bible? The conclave in nicea called all religious leaders to it… I believe that Constantine was the surpreme ruler in those parts, and they whittled it down to what they read today. Books that didn’t show “God’s or Jesus’s” divinity were eliminated! That’s why it’s called the “holy” bible. How about the one where Jesus kills a man for touching him… it was in there at one time, somewhere between 18 and 33 yrs old he did this… just my 2 cents…
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
The bible should be in the fiction section at the library.
Similar threads
