When do you get a soul??

What a great example to set as a mod. A true demonstration of leadership.

Mods are not meant to be leaders, more like custodians. Pad is under no obligation to set any examples, but simply to conform to the same standards that apply to everyone here.

You have yet to explain why scrutiny is rude. If you feel demonized it is because your views are fiendish.
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Kaendar"And you dodged the question. Once again, if what you say isnt gonna change our beliefs, then why waste your time saying it? Dont answer my question with another question."

I do agree with the "question with question" non-answer as being a good troll for some. But, I'm not saying that to change anyone's belief. And I don't feel like I'm wasting my time to bring up discussion points.

So, a question for discussion could be, why care if your question get's dodged? Who has the athority to demand attention? Even in society, I don't have to answer anyone's question in a civil sense unless compelled by supoena. Is it not considered rude to keep demanding answers?
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Kaendar"And you dodged the question. Once again, if what you say isnt gonna change our beliefs, then why waste your time saying it? Dont answer my question with another question."

I do agree with the "question with question" non-answer as being a good troll for some. But, I'm not saying that to change anyone's belief. And I don't feel like I'm wasting my time to bring up discussion points.

So, a question for discussion could be, why care if your question get's dodged? Who has the athority to demand attention? Even in society, I don't have to answer anyone's question in a civil sense unless compelled by supoena. Is it not considered rude to keep demanding answers?
Ask the atheists. They are the ones that demand attention and responses to their questions.
 
Ask the atheists. They are the ones that demand attention and responses to their questions.

Why ask the atheists? One atheist might love attention. Another atheist might despise attention. Again, you can't group atheists together since they only have one thing in common, which is the rejection of an idea.
 
Why ask the atheists? One atheist might love attention. Another atheist might despise attention. Again, you can't group atheists together since they only have one thing in common, which is the rejection of an idea.
Im sorry. Ask Padawan, Heis, Heph, Zaihet, and the rest of the lynch mob.
 
No it cant. I dont go around telling everyone their beliefs are wrong over and over. I let them know how I feel and leave it at that like a mature adult should. I dont continuously run circles around people poking them trying to convince them that what they are saying is absurd. Thats something a child would do.
You have said many things are wrong while standing in a bigot position. You still haven't changed your mind. Shall I bring up your views of gays as an example? You kept telling people that it is a disorder. That was just an example, lets not carry that subject on.

I'm sure you can now see that you say others are wrong too.

I don't think the skeptics here are being rude to you (well at least not before you started dishing out insults). They simply ask questions and voice their opinions.
 
You have said many things are wrong while standing in a bigot position. You still haven't changed your mind. Shall I bring up your views of gays as an example? You kept telling people that it is a disorder. That was just an example, lets not carry that subject on.

I'm sure you can now see that you say others are wrong too.

I don't think the skeptics here are being rude to you (well at least not before you started dishing out insults). They simply ask questions and voice their opinions.
I said that the disorder thing was a theory, I dont believe it like fact, only a possibility. It seems that everyone here including cn have the problem of taking what I say and blowing it out or proportion.
 
I said that the disorder thing was a theory, I dont believe it like fact, only a possibility. It seems that everyone here including cn have the problem of taking what I say and blowing it out or proportion.

In the closed thread, you repeatedly presented this "theory" as if it had the weight of gravity. You provide your own refutation. cn
 
I said that the disorder thing was a theory, I dont believe it like fact, only a possibility. It seems that everyone here including cn have the problem of taking what I say and blowing it out or proportion.

Hi K, I'm back and i'm ready, willing, and able to blow you out of proportion.
 
Theories are refuted and/or supported. That's forum. Baiting and backbiting, duck dodge and weave, is....wait for it.....troll.
 
I said that the disorder thing was a theory, I dont believe it like fact, only a possibility. It seems that everyone here including cn have the problem of taking what I say and blowing it out or proportion.

But you kept saying your opinion was right.. So you do tell others they're wrong.

Do you understand that skeptics aren't just telling you you're wrong just to be a dick? They're voicing their opinions just like you do. the only difference is they go about it in a more mature way (not making insults and such.. well I mean NOW they do, but they didn't until you insulted them).

What do you have against skeptics? Is it because our views differ? Do you hate logic? I just don't get it.

By saying that you believe in god you're disagreeing with us. We don't get mad though. We don't start saying "you religious people are mean for saying my beliefs are wrong.. blah blah"
 
But you kept saying your opinion was right.. So you do tell others they're wrong.

Do you understand that skeptics aren't just telling you you're wrong just to be a dick? They're voicing their opinions just like you do. the only difference is they go about it in a more mature way (not making insults and such.. well I mean NOW they do, but they didn't until you insulted them).

What do you have against skeptics? Is it because our views differ? Do you hate logic? I just don't get it.

By saying that you believe in god you're disagreeing with us. We don't get mad though. We don't start saying "you religious people are mean for saying my beliefs are wrong.. blah blah"
It doesnt bother me that people disagree, it bothers me that they wont give up once they get the point across.
 
It doesnt bother me that people disagree, it bothers me that they wont give up once they get the point across.
If you bring up a new point every time you post, then it is certainly appropriate to discuss and/or criticize this new point. If you do not want to be critiqued, you don't have to post anything.
 
It doesnt bother me that people disagree, it bothers me that they wont give up once they get the point across.
You don't either. And that's fine as long as you accept criticism and don't insult people. We accept criticism. Go ahead, ask me a question. I'll give you an honest answer.
 
Back
Top