DavidKratos92
Well-Known Member
agreed
Who will be better at getting America out of debt, Trump or Hillary?
- Thread starter DavidKratos92
- Start date
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Lol how the fuck would you know? Your only study of history is what you eagerly swallow while on your knees in front of Faux Spews.
You got some HIS story on your chin... better lick that up.
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
Solid burn.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Pretty clever, is this the crescendo leading up to your usual bullshit reading list of David Cay Johnston and the like?
Reuters on DCJ said:
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Ah, yes- the sad pathetic attempt at an intellectual preemptive strike.
If you think lower taxes on the rich and mega corps is the way forward, then you haven't been paying attention for 40 years.
Just keep sucking that right wing cock and see what it gets you. You aren't rich, you're just a bitch, nevermind sucker for those who are.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
OK, throwing insults to avoid an actual discussion. Well that's a new one on RIU politics you should get a trophy. Here ya go slugger......
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Do you have an actual position with defined parameters or will it be the usual douchebaggery today? I can tell you I am not a fan of rich or megacorps per say. Why don't you try and take little bites that you can actually digest, defining "rich" would be an excellent starting point.
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
I would say rich would be something like a couple million or so. You can sit on that and earn a few thousand on it every month just from having it in the bank (if you are smart enough not to waste it on shit like a fast car, or a super expensive drum kit or whatever) I consider "wealthy" to be in the upper hundred millions or billions. Idk, though. What would you define it as?
srh88
Well-Known Member
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
LOL. Want.
srh88
Well-Known Member
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I buy that. I support income taxing of the rich/wealthy as well, it seems the rich/wealthy by and large are mostly the ones with a propensity to generate income.
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
Blows me away that he said he was "smart" for evading his taxes for 20 something years.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I've heard two sides to that. I don't have an onion either way. I know the comb over looks as decent as a comb over can I guess.
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
Fair enough.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I haven't gotten over to your mayor thread yet, good luck!
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Funny, I've been saying the same thing for years now. Coincidentally, so has David Kay Johnston. Yet you can't say anything coherent to me about it.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Well if you can carry forward a tax loss, it's prudent to do so. Definitely not something to brag about, however.
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
For sure. Def not a brag.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Embarrassing as it may be, carrying the loss forward on his taxes might just be the most intelligent and respectable thing he's ever done, lol
...after losing a billion dollars on a casino in Atlantic City, FFS? I mean, HOW does one even do that? It's like dying of starvation while swimming in a pool of Ensure!
Similar threads
