Bangaman
Active Member
Only if you consider best " time to flower " to be a factor of plant size can this be worth trying. WORTH being the operative here, because crop weight is a factor of plant size.
I am supposing the "science" or reasoning behind this hypothesis is the concept of "arrested development", That the physiological changes that are triggered by the 12/12 light cycle are "captured" within a plant at time of incision. That these "physiological changes" somehow over ride plant genetics along with human manipulation because in my opinion the latter two dictate crop size.
It would be a beautiful thing if we could lazy our way into monster size crops with just one snap of the scalpel on a FEMALE plant "in flowering".
JESUS CHRIST! Clone me a few bitches in heat (ovulating) and get me a world full of nymphomaniacs for the pleasure of Man-kind, After all, that is all Woman-kind are good for---plenty-plenty children and always stay horny.
DANG! Such "super females" could be our solution to end Kim Jong-un...Maybe take over the Chinese...A Nobel Prize!
Reminds me of the scene in the movie Braveheart in which King Edward I (Longshanks) laments that there are too many Scots (Chinese). His solution is to declare reinstatement of the old practice of primae noctis, where English noblemen have the right to take or preferably "deflower" Scottish Women (newlywed wives) on their wedding night. Upon declaring primae noctis, Longshanks states (in obvious reference to impregnating the Scots’ brides), “If we can’t get them out, we’ll breed them out.” I tell ya, with this (Weed Science) we can win the Economic war with China.
HOLLY CRAP! I'M SO HIGH RIGHT NOW
Last edited:
