Why do Bernie Babies deny helping Trump get elected?

Padawanbater2 said:
Apparently not to the majority of the American people

You and the rest of the Hillbots can claim nothing she did "even showed the appearance of corruption" all you want. According to "the only vote that mattered", it did.
Click to expand...

in 2008, Clinton was only able to convert 76% of her voters to Obama..a full 12% less than what Sanders converted to her (88%), after WE THE PEOPLE knew she cheated?
 
schuylaar said:
in 2008, Clinton was only able to convert 76% of her voters to Obama..a full 12% less than what Sanders converted to her (88%), after WE THE PEOPLE knew she cheated?
Click to expand...

Not that I doubt you (if that sounded sarcastic. It wasn't), but may I ask for a citation please?
 
dagwood45431 said:
I reject the initial argument since it can't be supported and for that I do thank you. It's simpler for you two to just admit you're full of shit than forcing me to prove it. Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Derp.

You share all the intellectual hallmarks of Stinkydigit with silly ass excuses for logic like that.

Maturity would look at the data.

Idiocy makes up stupid excuses for why they won't.

Guess which camp you fall in today?
 
ttystikk said:
What's sad is your total inability to use this thing called an internet.

http://news.gallup.com/opinion/poll...gest-differentiators-views-clinton-trump.aspx

http://www.npr.org/2017/08/24/54581...voters-ended-up-supporting-trump-survey-finds

Or are you just stupid, as well as lazy?
Click to expand...

I'm lazy. So, you're saying she used two sources for her information? That's weird.

Please quote the text in either of the sources cited that match the numbers as presented. I didn't ask for general information. I asked schuy for her specific source. Why are you even trying to answer the question, asswipe? This isn't about you (I know, SHOCK, eh?).
 
dagwood45431 said:
I'm lazy. So, you're saying she used two sources for her information? That's weird.

Please quote the text in either of the sources cited that match the numbers as presented. I didn't ask for general information. I asked schuy for her specific source. Why are you even trying to answer the question, asswipe? This isn't about you (I know, SHOCK, eh?).
Click to expand...
Doubling down on wilfully stupid.

Why am I not surprised?
 
ttystikk said:
Doubling down on wilfully stupid.

Why am I not surprised?
Click to expand...

Me?

You threw shit at the wall and expected it to stick, dumbass.

The material you provided does not support schuy's numbers.

I'll wait for her to answer the question I asked her and which only she can answer. In the meantime, I'll
thank you to shut the fuck up and mind your own goddamned business. You cannot answer the question I asked. STFU you gigantic skidmark. Thanks.
 
dagwood45431 said:
Me?

You threw shit at the wall and expected it to stick, dumbass.

The material you provided does not support schuy's numbers.

I'll wait for her to answer the question I asked her and which only she can answer. In the meantime, I'll
thank you to shut the fuck up and mind your own goddamned business. You cannot answer the question I asked. STFU you gigantic skidmark. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Awww can't read?

It's exactly what she was talking about.

And no, I won't.

You're welcome.
 
ttystikk said:
Derp.

You share all the intellectual hallmarks of Stinkydigit with silly ass excuses for logic like that.

Maturity would look at the data.

Idiocy makes up stupid excuses for why they won't.

Guess which camp you fall in today?
Click to expand...

Me: Hey schuy, where did you get that info?

You: Look it up.

Me: No, she got the numbers from a specific source and I'd like to vet it.

You: Here are two random links.

Me: That's not what I asked for. You cannot answer the question unless you know where she got the info.

You: Derp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top