Why Is The Bible So Revered As The "Word of GOD"?
- Thread starter RyanTheRhino
- Start date
- Status
mindphuk
Well-Known Member
Actually no. I am not the confused one here.
Wow, so if you claim your opponent is emotional you get to win the debate? Merely asserting your opponent is emotional and therefore weak is a poor substitute for actually attacking the substance of a post but I guess when that's all you got...
Except the part where you give an incorrect definition for critical thinking. As well as the strawman you just made there.
Ah yes, the ad hominem, seemingly the most abundant arrow in the quiver of the theist.
More accusations about the emotions of your opponents. Even if I was angry at you, it doesn't support your delusion.Why does it anger you SO much that I have a personal relationship with The Creator, or the idea that he/she would want to talk to me?
So you agree then that most people believe this nonsense because of fear and not logic and reason.
KlosetKing
Well-Known Member
More insults, your just as good at this as BB.
No, it was a question, by someone who came off as an atheist i might add.
Once again, wrong. Go back and read the thread PLEASE. I don't know why i have to say it so many goddamn times. HE started with the insults. Get with the program.
The truth is not how YOU see it. The truth requires facts. What you have is belief not truth. What is so hard to understand about that?
Duh, we said multiple times the ones in question (in regards to that) are usually JW's and Mormons. Christians are the 'lethargic of the faithful'. They live life by enough gray areas, they tend to not be too oppressing anymore.
You still misunderstand. This isn't about faith, its about representing your faith as scientific fact. It isn't, why cant you understand this?
Insult me, tell me i cant provide meaningful debate, then say that the combination of those things keep your skills honed? Im truly lost now. I respect your point of view (opinion) all i need to. What i don't respect is misrepresentation.
Lies. You have insulted me twice now sir. Please, go back and show me where i started it.
Really? Cuz if i went back and quoted everything youve said since you joined this thread, im betting it would contradict that.
Please do! Because i havnt insulted you sir, but you have insulted me several times. Your the one feeling hurt and offended here and lashing back out, not I. I am not so insecure in by beliefs.
And yet you use a book full of anonymous peoples 'stories' and reference it as fact to back your faith up? Your hipocrisy never ends.
And for ONCE you say something i agree with. Holy shit.
Is that like, a Jesus Snack? Comes with the wine at communion right?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
So BB, you still aint answered the fact we actually have "transitional links" in our bodies right now. God just give us these pointless organs/skeletal structures for the laugh?
Is it not possible that a "higher power" just lit the fuse to the Big Bang? Or that "God" set the evolution ball rolling?
Fossils are extremely rare as they require very exact conditions to form, its the same reason why graveyards never actually fill up
Im agnostic btw, so Im not agreeing or disagreeing with anyones beliefs, but saying evolution never happened (and isnt happening right now) is just foolish, faith or not.
And believing the Bible word for word is even more foolish, a priest or a minister would be the first person to tell you the Bible should NOT be taken word for word, its supposed to be more of a guideline book to ensure people lived good lives. And these people have degrees in theology, I doubt you do.
Also just as a sidenote to all the Christians on here...your aware the Old Testiment is actually a Jewish sacred scripture, right?
Is it not possible that a "higher power" just lit the fuse to the Big Bang? Or that "God" set the evolution ball rolling?
Fossils are extremely rare as they require very exact conditions to form, its the same reason why graveyards never actually fill up
Im agnostic btw, so Im not agreeing or disagreeing with anyones beliefs, but saying evolution never happened (and isnt happening right now) is just foolish, faith or not.
And believing the Bible word for word is even more foolish, a priest or a minister would be the first person to tell you the Bible should NOT be taken word for word, its supposed to be more of a guideline book to ensure people lived good lives. And these people have degrees in theology, I doubt you do.
Also just as a sidenote to all the Christians on here...your aware the Old Testiment is actually a Jewish sacred scripture, right?
KlosetKing
Well-Known Member
So BB, you still aint answered the fact we actually have "transitional links" in our bodies right now. God just give us these pointless organs/skeletal structures for the laugh?
Is it not possible that a "higher power" just lit the fuse to the Big Bang? Or that "God" set the evolution ball rolling?
Fossils are extremely rare as they require very exact conditions to form, its the same reason why graveyards never actually fill up
Im agnostic btw, so Im not agreeing or disagreeing with anyones beliefs, but saying evolution never happened (and isnt happening right now) is just foolish, faith or not.
And believing the Bible word for word is even more foolish, a priest or a minister would be the first person to tell you the Bible should NOT be taken word for word, its supposed to be more of a guideline book to ensure people lived good lives. And these people have degrees in theology, I doubt you do.
Also just as a sidenote to all the Christians on here...your aware the Old Testiment is actually a Jewish sacred scripture, right?
Very well said sir. Your ideas and beliefs fall almost exactly into mine. I am also agnostic, and i merely see the Big Bang, evolution, Math, you name it, as all being merely tools the 'creator' used.
To say there is NO god is as foolish as blindly believing that 'his' hand is in every action WE take every day.
Ive said it a thousand times. Science is not in the business of 'disproving god'. It's in the business of removing 'opinion', replacing it with DATA, and drawing educated decisions therein. So again I ask BB and others, why is religion so bent on disproving science?
Simple: Science WANTS to be wrong. Its how it betters itself.
Religion, doesn't benefit from being wrong, at ALL.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
I have read the post, and its clear to all who should read the Fucking thread-klosetman!
Hey Klosetman, this is Post #61, which illustrates your "mentor" hurling the very first insult at me.
mindphuk
Well-Known Member
Nice red herring. Now maybe no one will notice all of the posts that you have avoided answering.I have read the post, and its clear to all who should read the Fucking thread-klosetman!
Hey Klosetman, this is Post #61, which illustrates your "mentor" hurling the very first insult at me.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
^^^
Sir, don't sit there like a stuck-up chicken with egg on your face. Your protégé got caught in a lie, face it. LOL
Sir, don't sit there like a stuck-up chicken with egg on your face. Your protégé got caught in a lie, face it. LOL
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Neanderthal?
Not yet homo sapien.
Transition from our earlier ape ancestors and current humans.
More than 100 have been discovered.
How do you explain that?
Seems pretty cut and dry if you can't, you lose.
Take your time...
Not yet homo sapien.
Transition from our earlier ape ancestors and current humans.
More than 100 have been discovered.
How do you explain that?
Seems pretty cut and dry if you can't, you lose.
Take your time...
mindphuk
Well-Known Member
Face it. Calling you delusional is not an insult but an accurate observation.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
You mean the post I asked you to provide concerning a transitioning amphibian pelvis bone, since its needed to advance from the sea to land. Also, it's one of many links need to substantiate the Theory of Evolution. As I said before, I don't want you to provide videos of fully developed skulls or skeletons; instead, small graduations in skeletal formation are what we are looking for.
Now I'm going to give the viewers another chance to see what a "dodger" you are, by asking you to provide just one, transitioning amphibian pelvis bone, since according to the theory of evolution, there should be literally thousands.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
Beware of red herring!! LOL
KlosetKing
Well-Known Member
^^^
Sir, don't sit there like a stuck-up chicken with egg on your face. Your protégé got caught in a lie, face it. LOL
Hey Klosetman, this is Post #61, which illustrates your "mentor" hurling the very first insult at me.
Sir, how dare you call me a liar. You are only now molding your definition of an insult. Saying your being delusional is a personal insult is it? Well by that definition, you technically started it 4 posts before that, Post 57 (4 posts before calling you delusional):
Frankly, its just as much of a personal insult by YOUR definition. Twist it all you want, call me a liar all you want, but your wrong, plain and simple.
To be clear, i still wouldn't call either of those insults, you calling him Dumbphuk was the first true insult. Those posts, are hostility at MOST. But the facts are right in front of your face. Call it what you want, insult, hostility, 'temper', whatever, YOU started it.
mindphuk
Well-Known Member
You have already been provided with the evidence. It is up to you to refute it. When you keep asking for something that has been given to you, it becomes clear you don't understand it.You mean the post I asked you to provide concerning a transitioning amphibian pelvis bone, since it’s needed to advance from the sea to land. Also, it's one of many links need to substantiate the Theory of Evolution. As I said before, I don't want you to provide videos of fully developed skulls or skeletons; instead, small graduations in skeletal formation are what we are looking for.
Now I'm going to give the viewers another chance to see what a "dodger" you are, by asking you to provide just one, transitioning amphibian pelvis bone, since according to the theory of evolution, there should be literally thousands.
It is now up to you to explain in detail why those small changes in skeletal formation are not good enough for you. How about you detail for us the features of a pelvis that would satisfy you and your requirements? Should the acetabulum be shallow or deep? What about the position of the sciatic notch compared to a real amphibian? Would the iliac crest be wider or longer?
I don't think you can tell the difference between an amphibian pelvis and and a coffee mug let alone a pelvis that has features of both amphibians and reptiles. Why should anyone listen to you tell them what a pelvis should or should not look like in a transition species?
So far I think the viewers have already concluded you are not only a dodger but don't understand what you are talking about and trying to discuss something you don't understand just makes you sound stupid. You sound like you think a transitional animal changes its form and morphs into something else like in a cartoon.
budlover13
King Tut
Schizophrenia must suck.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
^^^ Lying Cop is worst!
budlover13
King Tut
LOL! the ONE thing you can count on is that i won't lie. Unlike YOU'RE twisted posts, i am honest. EX-cop. Get it straight BroBuz.
budlover13
King Tut
Oh yeah. Worse.
BrotherBuz
Active Member
KlosetKing
Well-Known Member
- Status
Similar threads
