why isnt this man president?

max420thc

Well-Known Member
U.S. March Unemployment Probably Rose to 25-Year High (Update1)
Share | Email | Print | A A A


By Bob Willis


April 3 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. jobless rate rose in March to the highest level in 25 years and payrolls plunged, exposing the economy to the risk of renewed declines in spending that would scuttle a recovery, economists said before a report today.
Unemployment jumped to 8.5 percent from 8.1 percent in February, according to the median of 79 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. The figures may also show employers cut 660,000 workers from staff, bringing total losses since the recession began to 5 million, the biggest slump in the postwar era.
Evaporating jobs and declining pay mean President Barack Obama’s pledge to create or save 3.5 million jobs through tax cuts and government spending may fall short of what’s needed to revive the world’s largest economy. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has conceded joblessness could top 10 percent under a worst-case scenario.
“The unemployment rate is not done rising and the gain in March won’t be the last,” said Stuart Hoffman, chief U.S. economist at PNC Financial Services Group Inc. in Pittsburgh. “With jobs still declining and incomes being squeezed, consumer spending still looks quite weak.”
The job cuts have been spreading from manufacturers like Johnson Controls Inc. and Dana Holding Corp., to service providers like International Business Machines Corp. and even the U.S. Postal Service.
‘Severe Job Cuts’
The last time the unemployment rate was at 8.5 percent was in November 1983, when the economy was recovering from the 1981- 82 recession that pushed the rate to almost 11 percent. Then Fed Chairman Paul Volcker boosted interest rates to quell soaring inflation following the 1970s fuel crisis.
Today’s employment report will probably show “severe job cuts” in March, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said today. Gibbs, speaking aboard Air Force One, said he had not seen the figures.
Labor’s report is due at 8:30 a.m. in Washington. Economists’ payroll estimates ranged from declines of 525,000 to 750,000. Forecasts for the jobless rate spanned from 8.2 percent to 8.7 percent.
A report at 10 a.m. may show service industries shrank last month at a slower pace. The Tempe, Arizona-based Institute for Supply Management’s non-manufacturing index, which covers almost 90 percent of the economy, probably rose to 42 from 41.6 in February, according to economists surveyed. A reading of 50 is the breakeven point between contraction and growth.
Auto Slump
IBM, the world’s biggest computer-services provider, cut about 5,000 jobs last week, according to a person familiar with the matter. The reduction was in addition to the more than 4,000 jobs already eliminated since January.
The manufacturing slump that began more than a year ago may intensify should General Motors Corp. be forced into bankruptcy, economists said. As many as 1 million additional auto-industry jobs may be lost and the unemployment rate would climb to 11 percent, said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York.
The auto slump has already rippled through the industry. Johnson Controls, a maker of car interiors and batteries, said last month it will shut 10 factories and cut about 4,000 jobs. Dana, the truck-axle manufacturer that exited bankruptcy in 2008, said it will boost its payroll reduction to 5,800 this year, 800 more than previously announced.
‘No Assurances’
“We believe we are taking the difficult actions necessary to survive,” Dana Chief Executive Officer John Devine said in a March 16 statement. “There can be no assurances, however, if the global economy deteriorates substantially beyond our planning assumptions.”
Since taking office Jan. 20, Obama has enacted a series of measures aimed at stemming the recession. He signed into law a $787 billion stimulus plan on Feb. 17 that included spending on infrastructure projects to boost hiring.
The Treasury Department is also moving to repair the damaged financial system and lower record foreclosures, while the Fed is flooding markets with cash to boost borrowing and spending.
Bernanke last month said it was “certainly well within the realm of possibility” that unemployment nationwide could rise above 10 percent “for a period.” That’s the assumption being used in a worst-case scenario in tests to determine the health of the banking system, he said.

Bloomberg Survey

its just picking up some steam
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Here are some reasons why he's not president:

Adultery:

Sex on the Desk - Oral Sex is More Easily Denied

Several newspapers are now reporting that Newt Gingrich is dating and basically living with Callista Bisek, a "willowy blond Congressional aide 23 years his junior." Biske, 33, has been spending nights at Gingrich's apartment near the Capitol and has her own key. In an amazing act of hypocrisy, Gingrich was apparently dating Bisek all during Clinton-Lewinsky adultery scandal, even as he proclaimed family values and bitterly criticized the President for his adultery.
Reporters and other Washington insiders have known about this relationship since 1994, even before Gingrich became Speaker of the House, but did not have any solid proof to report. In 1995, Vanity Fair magazine described Bisek as Gingrich's "frequent breakfast companion." Gingrich was married to Marianne Gingrich during all of that time, and just filed for divorce in August 1999.
Newt is apparently trying to create a new hybrid form, Christian adultery. According to MSNBC, Bisek sings in the National Shrine Choir, and Newt would often wait for her at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, listening to her sing while he read the Bible.
This is hardly the first time Newt has cheated, either. "It was common knowledge that Newt was involved with other women during his [first] marriage to Jackie. Maybe not on the level of John Kennedy. But he had girlfriends -- some serious, some trivial." -- Dot Crews, his campaign scheduler throughout the 70s. One woman, Anne Manning, has come forward and confirmed a relationship with him during the 1976 campaign. "We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'"
Kip Carter, his former campaign treasurer, was walking Newt's daughters back from a football game one day and cut across a driveway where he saw a car. "As I got to the car, I saw Newt in the passenger seat and one of the guys' wives with her head in his lap going up and down. Newt kind of turned and gave me this little-boy smile. Fortunately, Jackie Sue and Kathy were a lot younger and shorter then."
Family Values? Pressing Wife for Divorce in the Hospital:

"He walked out in the spring of 1980.... By September, I went into the hospital for my third surgery. The two girls came to see me, and said, "Daddy is downstairs. Could he come up?" When he got there, he wanted to discuss the terms of the divorce while I was recovering from my surgery." - Jackie, his first wife.
Dead-Beat Dad:

The hospital visit wasn't the end of it, either. Jackie had to take Newt to court to get him to contribute for bills, as utilities were about to be cut off.
Draft Dodger:

Though he relentlessly pushes military spending and talks like a bigtime hawk, Gingrich avoided the Vietnam War through a combination of student and family deferments. (He married one of his teachers at age 19.)

I think he's talking the talk now but he's a war-hawk. I can't support anyone who wants to keep our troops based overseas AT ALL. "They" are preping him for a run. He will loss because Americans can't seem to get shit like this from effecting their votes he's a shill. I mean they called Ron Paul a rascist and he never lived it down he explained it up one side and down the other. But all it took was some bloggers to post he was a rascist and he never lived it down. He will do nothing to change the SYSTEM i.e. the FED he loves the FED as much as any Dem. He is an establishment guy. Never agien will I support an establishment canidate or the one they want me to elect no way.
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
i dont care who he fucked on his desk. i dont care about his family or his religious life.
in hind site looking at vietnam and knowing what mcnamera said.
avoiding vietnam was the smart thing to do.
everything the man says is spot on the money.
i like ron paul. everything newt says is a spot on assesment of the situation .
im not sure how establishment newt is.
i am pretty sure he is a CFR member.
id take ron paul before newt.neither are possible to be elected.
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
remember ben franklin? LOL
there is no telling how many childred he had running around france and other places at one time.
seems ol ben franklin liked to fuck around ALOT..over 40K patriots showed up to his funeral in philly when he died.
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Like I said I don't care if he likes to get his pecker wet but it will prevent him from being elected. Draft dodging is a race ender. They run him he can't win, the GOP becomes a dead end party. That will have to merge with the Constitution and Libritarian partys just to stand a chance.

I kinda like Mark Sanford but agien they will probably spout rascism.

I wish he (Franklin) was here now. I would love to see him dress down congress OMFG that would be great.
 

Olstinker

Active Member
Newt is a brilliant man but he cant win.. period, too many sketetons in the closet. The next pres. will be Bobby Jindel.., i know i know, who is that? Hes currently the La. gov. And yes the party is already grooming him and theres no skeletons in his closet.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Gingrich is a complete and total ass ... folks did you know this asshole wanted the death penalty for carrying two oz of pot into the country? He's fucking crazy ... that's why he isn't president. ... and thank God he isn't!

http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/gingrich-we-should-have-singapore-st?highlight=Newt+GingrichGingrich: We should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans



Newt Gingrich followed Bill O'Reilly's lead last night on The O'Reilly Factor, talking about how Americans' drug use -- and not horribly wrong-headed American drug laws -- are responsible for the border wars being waged by Mexican cartels.
O'Reilly seemed to think that Singapore might be a model to follow, since things work so swell over there:
O'Reilly: I don't know whether you know this, but I did one of my papers at Harvard on this -- on how to reduce demand for drugs. But the United States has never figured it out. You can't lock up drug users, I mean, that doesn't work. And you can't force them into rehab, you have to want rehab, and even if you want it, it's very hard to get off hard drugs and alcohol. Very hard.
What you can do, though, is sanction people along the way. And this is what they do in Singapore. If you're caught possessing drugs -- and that means drugs in your bloodstream, they have a little hair thing, and they put it in there -- then you have to go to mandatory rehab. And they have centers where you go.
Now, they have no drug problem in Singapore at all, number one, because they hang drug dealers -- they execute them. And number two, the market is very thin, because when they catch you using, you go away with a mandatory rehab. You go to some rehab center, which they have, which the government has built.
The United States does not have the stomach for that. We don't have the stomach for that, Mr. Speaker.
Gingrich: Well, I think it's time we get the stomach for that, Bill. And I think we need a program -- I would dramatically expand testing. I think we have -- and I agree with you. I would try to use rehabilitation, I'd make it mandatory. And I think we have every right as a country to demand of our citizens that they quit doing illegal things which are funding, both in Afghanistan and in Mexico and in Colombia, people who are destroying civilization.
Of course, mandatory testing means that everyone is a suspect, and everyone must submit. Aren't these the same right-wingers who are complaining loudly that Obama's supposed "socialism" is all about taking away our rights and enslaving us in a totalitarian state?
I keep hearing that Newt is trying to position himself for a 2012 presidential run. Nice to know what he has in mind for us citizens.
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Yeah well Fuck whoever they groom. If he isn't a fiscal conservative and social liberal fuck him.
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
This is the problem with Republicans. They think they must impose their morality onto the population as a whole. That "society demands." What is society?? There is no such thing, there is no reasoning with society, no debating society. Its a non-entety, I can not write an e-mail to society. I don't beleive in society. People say religion causes war, I say "NO society causes war, group think causes war"

Morality is yours alone I can not tell you "thou shalt not" you know in your own heart what you shall and shall not do. Unless your harming another I can do nothing. Legislating morallity is a sure fire way to cause all manner of ill's. The Federal government should try dealling with numbers and facts not the vaguries of morallity. Leave the morallity judgments to ever more local juristictions.
 

ViRedd

New Member
What Mexico is experiencing and what U.S. towns along our Southern border are experiencing, is nothing more than unintended consequences of government intervention.

Government hacks like Hillary Clinton would have us believe that the American drug user is to blame for what's happening. While there is no doubt that the drug user supplies the demand, illegality provides the black market and the war for supremacy in that market among the Mexican cartels.

The War on Drugs, like our War on Poverty, has been a dismal failure.

Vi
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Yeah and the American Drug user could give a shit less about Hill-Dog. We gotta open up stores to sell the shit a blind man could see that. Its not use that is really bad it is the distribution network. The Black market is what is bad. Just a few weeks ago a guy in town here was shot by Gangsters from Chicago because he sold them shitty Meth (it was cut or something) well he violated a very simple market rule. Don't misrepresent your product, he had commited Fraud. And because his acusers were unable to take him as to court like civilized people they resolved the issue the only other way availible to them. And rightly so. The guy had it coming. Fraud is Fraud wether it is the CEO of AIG or the CEO of "Meth is Us."
 

ViRedd

New Member
That's exactly right ilkhan ... and this is the best argument for getting the drug issue out of the hands of government officials.

As a Libertarian, I'm sure you would agree with the premise that it is none of government's business what the citizen smokes, snorts, drinks or ingests as long as the rights of another citizen isn't violated in the process, right?

The War on Drugs is a huge government boondoggle. The two factions that gain the most from keeping drugs illegal are the criminal justice system and drug dealers.

Vi
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
This is the problem with Republicans. They think they must impose their morality onto the population as a whole. That "society demands." What is society?? There is no such thing, there is no reasoning with society, no debating society. Its a non-entety, I can not write an e-mail to society. I don't beleive in society. People say religion causes war, I say "NO society causes war, group think causes war"

Morality is yours alone I can not tell you "thou shalt not" you know in your own heart what you shall and shall not do. Unless your harming another I can do nothing. Legislating morallity is a sure fire way to cause all manner of ill's. The Federal government should try dealling with numbers and facts not the vaguries of morallity. Leave the morallity judgments to ever more local juristictions.
morality is dictated by society through mores and religious doctrines.

ETHICS are yours alone.

further Justice is also rendered by society through it's laws, which seldom have shit to do with ethics or morality.
 
Top