Why not to vote

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You fail to see freedom in relative terms, there are natural limits to "freedom" some are limits in the interest of an evolving society such as quotas and affirmaitive action - they are temporary but serve to right a wrong over time and alter the makeup and attitudes of a society. Some limits to freedom are in the direct interest to society such as forbidding false advertising, enforcing ingredient labels, demanding full disclosure.

What you are looking for is a sort of freedom that is not possible in a modern society. If I manufacture and sell a medication that has no effectiveness and could easily be taken rather than a legitimate medicine to the detriment of the purchaser, is that violence? If I and another person enter freely into a contract where I say that this sterile sea water will cure your cancer but only if you do not undergo traditional chemo therapy - has violence been done to the cancer victim? (that is a true story btw - my friend died as a result).

You presume certain things exist that do not, can not or will not.
What you have described appears to be fraud.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
What you have described appears to be fraud.

the consumer says "I like this sterile seawater, I agree that it helps my cancer and I wish to purchase it". The vendor of the sterile seawater agrees as well. Now there is a consentual contract between the two parties.
 
Top