Why should I respect your beliefs?

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member


You have the right to say she is an idiot if you then support the right for people to backlash. That backlash might include criticism of your conduct, but something like that is a choice of expression, and therefore okay. Again even if you clean up your expression, to say something like "the woman is not with reality", you are still bowing to the pressure to respect conduct, and not the belief. How far does it extend? It extends as far as words allow. It stops at actions, which includes inciting action.



That is the very idea behind free speech, because there is no one standard for what is offensive. Everything you do and everything you say offends someone somewhere. Any clothing you put on with be objectionable to someone, and if you take them all off you are offending people too. The only way we could guarantee no one offended anyone else is if we made everyone stay inside and never talk or look at one another.
It's too bad people like you don't get elected to public office..
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
of course it aint my buissness if they want to where bed sheets and hang around a fire damning minorities their no worse then those religos nuts who say I'm going to hell cause I don't beleive the right religon or go to their church
So you respect the KKK's right to believe that black people are inferior?
 

Seedling

Well-Known Member
Thoughts and actions are two different things...

The difference between prejudice and discrimination is that prejudice is a thought, and discrimination is an action. You see the difference? Well, the same goes for the difference between beliefs and actions. A person can believe whatever they like, but it's their ACTIONS for which they are held accountable. People can say what they believe, but they are then responsible for those words. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that it's okay for you to go around town slandering somebody, that is against the law. You can express your ideas, but if they are later found to be unsubstantiated and harmful to another, you are held accountable!!
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Funny thing is, I doublt many will realize what respect is. You can't demand respect. That's gangland and it's not respect.

No one needs to respect belief, but many people don't give a bit of respect to the next guy as a fellow struggler in the game of life.

Respect, to me has bcome a sily, thowaway word like Trust or Truth. If we can't respect a fellow for his fellowship alone, you won't be able to undersand his beliefs, cause you are not listening, right? This is especially true in forum.

You don't know anything except what is written. You don't know the person or their persona, or if they are DEA, or Juvie Sex trolls. So, I say we should respect our own ignorance in the situation. And we should have some natural respect for anyone that comes with ideas to discuss. It is not that easy to express ourselves in writting.

So, my question to myself, do I possesses self-respect, at this moment? We can callenge beliefs and that's good for all.
But, it is an art to learn how not to be a turd in forum.
 

ThE sAtIvA hIgH

Well-Known Member
I will say one thing tho. You dont have to respect the belief, but you do have to respect the persons right to believe. Which means you cant prejudice their reason for believing at all.
it depends where you live , in some countries still today , merely talking about your beliefs could get you killed ,and this was world wide not to many years ago .
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
As I see this, anywhere in the world, at any moment, one can be seriously injured by talking about the wrong belief. It even extends to forum.

The mob is a danger whereerver we go. And it only takes one person to shout, He's a _____________, get him!
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
of course it aint my buissness if they want to where bed sheets and hang around a fire damning minorities their no worse then those religos nuts who say I'm going to hell cause I don't beleive the right religon or go to their church
You cant compare a church to the Klan. Thats just stupid.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
They are each a result of adhering to and failing to question an ideology. They both foster hate, preach intolerance and they are the same in their dogmatic nature.
You are insane. Churches are all about helping others and improving the quality of life. The KKK is all about hate and bigotry. You sir have negative feelings towards the church, which means your opinion has been compromised.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
You are insane. Churches are all about helping others and improving the quality of life. The KKK is all about hate and bigotry. You sir have negative feelings towards the church, which means your opinion has been compromised.
Dissenting opinion. Many many churches, including all the truly virulent Evangelical denominations, are about divisiveness. Chosen v. Damned. To me that is evil incarnate. They are the actual Satanists, because no decent God would want people so blindered. cn
 

Cut.Throat.

Well-Known Member
You are insane. Churches are all about helping others and improving the quality of life. The KKK is all about hate and bigotry. You sir have negative feelings towards the church, which means your opinion has been compromised.
As long as you adhere to their beliefs. If not they'll damn you and preach down on you in a heartbeat. True story.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
Dissenting opinion. Many many churches, including all the truly virulent Evangelical denominations, are about divisiveness. Chosen v. Damned. To me that is evil incarnate. They are the actual Satanists, because no decent God would want people so blindered. cn
Ok, if thats how you interpret that.. but it still cant be compared to the outright hate that the KKK preaches. Look at a church - they offer forgiveness, programs for you and your kids, assistance when you need it, emotional support, etc.. all in the name of saving souls for god. Look at the KKK - they teach hate, intolerance, ignorance, and lies based on the color of somebodies skin. Im sorry, but comparing the 2 is stupid. Its like comparing someone that has to use prescription narcotics for back pain to a heroin addict.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Ok, if thats how you interpret that.. but it still cant be compared to the outright hate that the KKK preaches. Look at a church - they offer forgiveness, programs for you and your kids, assistance when you need it, emotional support, etc.. all in the name of saving souls for god. Look at the KKK - they teach hate, intolerance, ignorance, and lies based on the color of somebodies skin. Im sorry, but comparing the 2 is stupid. Its like comparing someone that has to use prescription narcotics for back pain to a heroin addict.
The KKK is at least honest and open about their hate. The churches who preach their hate, their artificial but ideologically required divisions, camouflage it. They're the worse criminals of the mind. (My opinion.) cn
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
The KKK is at least honest and open about their hate. The churches who preach their hate, their artificial but ideologically required divisions, camouflage it. They're the worse criminals of the mind. (My opinion.) cn
Churches dont preach hate. They teach that anyone, even KKK members have a chance at salvation. They dont single out anybody and say that they are less or anything. Dont get me wrong, there are some false churches like that one that burnt the qurans, but thats a tiny percent.. maybe 1 out of every 1000 is extreme like that.
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
You are insane. Churches are all about helping others and improving the quality of life. The KKK is all about hate and bigotry. You sir have negative feelings towards the church, which means your opinion has been compromised.
You misunderstand. The KKK does charitable things as well. Doesn't change the fact that the ideology is flawed and fosters discrimination.

I suggest you look at the things the church has done when it had all the power. They burned women for being witches, because witchcraft was seen as the devils work. They skipped the step where they ask themselves if the devil is real. They covered the feet of non-believers in fat and roasted them. (The fat helped the nerve endings last longer) Once these non-believers succumbed to the pain and accepted God, they killed them immediately before they could backslide, for the benefit of their soul. Now, if these people had admitted they can not prove a soul, that it is merely a belief they prefer, would they then be able to find the ability to do these horrible things to people? I could fill this entire thread with examples of people committing heinous acts against their fellow man due to some belief they can't even begin to substantiate. If the church had it's way, there would be no tolerance for middle ground, no tolerance for non-belief.

Sophistication has eliminated potential for some of the most terrible acts, but we still see plenty of examples of a false and unproven ideology causing people to have ill-will towards their fellow man. This is my criticism of the church, irresponsibility, arrogance, and hypocrisy. (hypocrisy meaning, being critical of others and not yourself). The good that comes from the churches ideology is not unique to the church, it is not necessary to be a christian to want to help others. Atheists are capable of being just a charitable and for near identical reasons.

As you say, you have never personally seen an atheist help. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence of it that you yourself can view if you look. Denying that atheists can be charitable simply because you have not personally witnessed it is an example of bigotry. You are ignoring solid evidence and logic based arguments in favor of preserving your prejudice, and using a disingenuous reason to back it up. I can tell by your words that you are smart enough to realize that seeing an atheist help personally is an unreasonable qualification for believing they never help at all. It also doesn't seem that hard of a concept to understand that placing good acts and bad acts on a scale and weighing them doesn't lend any credence to the ideology behind them. We call that sort of thinking an appeal to final consequences. The idea that we can believe something because good things happen if we do. Not only is it a false idea (bad things happen as well) but it does nothing to speak to the truth value of the belief.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
You misunderstand. The KKK does charitable things as well. Doesn't change the fact that the ideology is flawed and fosters discrimination.

I suggest you look at the things the church has done when it had all the power. They burned women for being witches, because witchcraft was seen as the devils work. They skipped the step where they ask themselves if the devil is real. They covered the feet of non-believers in fat and roasted them. (The fat helped the nerve endings last longer) Once these non-believers succumbed to the pain and accepted God, they killed them immediately before they could backslide, for the benefit of their soul. Now, if these people had admitted they can not prove a soul, that it is merely a belief they prefer, would they then be able to find the ability to do these horrible things to people? I could fill this entire thread with examples of people committing heinous acts against their fellow man due to some belief they can't even begin to substantiate. If the church had it's way, there would be no tolerance for middle ground, no tolerance for non-belief.

Sophistication has eliminated potential for some of the most terrible acts, but we still see plenty of examples of a false and unproven ideology causing people to have ill-will towards their fellow man. This is my criticism of the church, irresponsibility, arrogance, and hypocrisy. (hypocrisy meaning, being critical of others and not yourself). The good that comes from the churches ideology is not unique to the church, it is not necessarily. Atheists are capable of being just a charitable and for near identical reasons.

As you say, you have never personally seen an atheist help. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence of it that you yourself can view if you look. Denying that atheists can be charitable simply because you have no personally witnessed it is an example of bigotry. You are ignoring solid evidence and logic based arguments in favor of preserving your prejudice, and using a disingenuous reason to back it up. I can tell by your words that you are smart enough to realize that seeing an atheist help personally is an unreasonable qualification for believing they never help at all. I also doesn't seem that hard of a concept to understand that placing good acts and bad acts on a scale and weighing them lends any credence to the ideology behind them. We call that sort of thinking an appeal to final consequences. The idea that we can believe something because good things happen if we do. Not only is it a false idea (bad things happen as well) but it does nothing to speak to the truth value of the belief.
Salem witch trials? Your talkin about stuff from a long time ago. Name an instance in modern times where a legitimate church did any harm or taught anything hateful.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Churches dont preach hate. They teach that anyone, even KKK members have a chance at salvation. They dont single out anybody and say that they are less or anything. Dont get me wrong, there are some false churches like that one that burnt the qurans, but thats a tiny percent.. maybe 1 out of every 1000 is extreme like that.
If you really, really study the First Commandment, you'll find the hinge of it right there. Divide. Conquer. Hate the Other. Imo. cn
 
Top