go look at side by side grows LED vs HPS. HPS always wins. even the good LEDs like the 5watt ones that high times advertises the solar storm is a no comparison. it has everything to do with penetration. if you grow big plants you want your lower buds to be nice and dense. LEDs wont do it. none of them that i seen yet. i hate how people try and use bullshit scientific claims that they think they know what they're talking about to justify that something is better. get both lighting sources, grow them side by side in the same conditions. you will see what wins every time. i dont personally know a single person that switched to LEDs. everyone i know that tried them went back to HPS. The only thing competing right now is the plasma lights. and im not talking your little 4x4 closet grows. these people have 4-6+ hps lights in just a single room. LEDs are great for side lighting though. maybe if your growing small plants LEDs would be better, but why the fuck would you want to do that? gotta stay within legal limits.Pizzapuffer,
what do you mean by penetration? i feel this is a word thrown around with no meaning. A photon of non uv will not penetrate a leaf. when lower canopy bud is larfy and does not devolpe fully it is because enough light did not reach it. Inverse square law of indoor lighting has nothing to do with penetration, rather totaly YPF. if someone bought a cheap shitty LED that only pulled 200 watts it will not produce very many photons. Has nothing to do with penetration has to do with total photons produced. a big led array that produces lots of light will "penetrate" just as well as any HPS. Shitty LEDs are shitty. Good LEDs are good. There are not many good LEDs and lots of companys sell snake oil. Take a look in the led section and you will some a few getten it done
Sidd
Hey Pizzapuffer,go look at side by side grows LED vs HPS. HPS always wins. even the good LEDs like the 5watt ones that high times advertises the solar storm is a no comparison. it has everything to do with penetration. if you grow big plants you want your lower buds to be nice and dense. LEDs wont do it. none of them that i seen yet. i hate how people try and use bullshit scientific claims that they think they know what they're talking about to justify that something is better. get both lighting sources, grow them side by side in the same conditions. you will see what wins every time. i dont personally know a single person that switched to LEDs. everyone i know that tried them went back to HPS. The only thing competing right now is the plasma lights. and im not talking your little 4x4 closet grows. these people have 4-6+ hps lights in just a single room. LEDs are great for side lighting though. maybe if your growing small plants LEDs would be better, but why the fuck would you want to do that? gotta stay within legal limits.
Let me try to clear the air on PENETRATIONPizzapuffer,
what do you mean by penetration? i feel this is a word thrown around with no meaning. A photon of non uv will not penetrate a leaf. when lower canopy bud is larfy and does not devolpe fully it is because enough light did not reach it. Inverse square law of indoor lighting has nothing to do with penetration, rather totaly YPF. if someone bought a cheap shitty LED that only pulled 200 watts it will not produce very many photons. Has nothing to do with penetration has to do with total photons produced. a big led array that produces lots of light will "penetrate" just as well as any HPS. Shitty LEDs are shitty. Good LEDs are good. There are not many good LEDs and lots of companys sell snake oil. Take a look in the led section and you will some a few getten it done
Sidd