Will You Take The Vaccine?

Are you going to take the corona virus vaccine?

  • No.

  • Yes.


Results are only viewable after voting.

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Nah it's "it helps save lives" and "not really and it might mess up mine, here's proof"
and then it's "lalala I'm not listening i hope you die lalalala"
You are here spreading lies and disinformation trying your best to murder people with bullshit, folks tend not to like murders, whatever their weapon of choice. Besides, we are doing it for the poor Trumpers, they are the ones getting sick and dying these days, the liberals are doing just fine. It is out of concern for others that we speak, we're all vaxxed to the max and not too concerned about ourselves, unlike you.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Nope you are because you are just making shit up that you think sounds good (or have been tricked into believing.

See you are mistaking the 'breakthrough cases' of vaccinated people who the CDC has estimated to be 26x less likely to have a breakthrough case as the people who are idiotically not getting vaccinated because of the propaganda spam.
Screen Shot 2021-09-03 at 3.28.22 PM.png

Which is not what you said as 'vaccinated spread cover as easily as the unvaccinated. Which is a lie.

Screen Shot 2021-09-03 at 3.28.55 PM.png

You are spreading very dangerous propaganda.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure what you're asking. The chance of recovering from covid among most people has always been 99% and above aka only around 0.01% don't. The other numbers refer to the rate of covid cases that are asymptomatic aka of no real concern, which at the begininng of covid had reports saying as high as 80%. Even some case studies published this year report similar numbers, although other numbers I saw were lower but still significant.
Drunk drivers have a 99% survival rate yet we have laws against it because it's a threat to public safety......
 

FermentFred

Active Member
The Texas law could be turned around in many states, if you give someone covid you can be sued by anybody etc, just substitute, covid. Then there's guns and anybody can sue someone who has an illegal one under state law etc, the list is endless. The SCOTUS opened a can of worms that they might have to swallow. If Texas turns blue in 2022, they could get rid of the antiabortion law and make the same kind of laws pertaining to guns and covid. Let the fuckers come out with their guns freaking out and mow them down, the feds would put the survivors on a terrorist watch list. Ya gotta win first, then all kinds of things become possible.
"if it even saves one life"

"YOU DON'T VOTE THE SAME AS ME??!?! I HOPE THE GOVERNMENT KILLS YOU"

lol typical nazi. Remember how hitler was voted into power? You're the kinda guy who'd vote for his policies, to say the least.
Oh yeah, masks mess up your life?
Like a fly to honey.....

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152240/
 

FermentFred

Active Member
Nope you are because you are just making shit up that you think sounds good (or have been tricked into believing.

See you are mistaking the 'breakthrough cases' of vaccinated people who the CDC has estimated to be 26x less likely to have a breakthrough case as the people who are idiotically not getting vaccinated because of the propaganda spam.
View attachment 4978828

Which is not what you said as 'vaccinated spread cover as easily as the unvaccinated. Which is a lie.

View attachment 4978829

You are spreading very dangerous propaganda.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33296437/
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/delta-variant-viral-load-scientists-are-watching-covid-pandemic-rcna1604

1+1=......:confused:
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Even in those counties that didn't vote for Trump, it's the Trumpers in them who are getting sick, it's actually much worse than they are saying. Half of republicans are not vaxxed and don't wear masks, no wonder their leaders in Washington are panicking and all over the map on the issue! Few will die compared to those infected, thanks to medical treatments and a younger demographic, but 60% of those hospitalized will go on to have long term covid or be fucked for life. Other Trumpers will have near death, attitude adjusting experiences, hate comes with a price, your life.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Data Shows Just How Hard Covid Hit Trump Counties

“This gives some real empirical weight to anecdotal evidence we have been seeing for months and months and months,” says Chris Hayes. “The delta wave is wreaking havoc disproportionately in Red America.”
 
Last edited:

doublejj

Well-Known Member

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
lol butthurt
No, I've seen disinformation before, if the Lancet actually thought the CDC was lying they would say so publicly and forcefully. The CDC was briefly corrupted under Trump, but so was almost the entire US government, he did try to steal the election and fomented an insurrection against the republic. Also there's the matter of Health Canada and all the other government health agencies, it's like the big lie, the international media says the same thing as regular legitimate American media does. Only a few propaganda outlets are spinning the covid lie for profit, the suckers eat that shit right up.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
about the "do it for grandma" argument - the vaccine doesn't stop you from getting sick. The Lancet released a study BEFORE the delta variant showing the best vaccine had a less than 2% absolute risk reduction against catching covid. And now it's MORE infectious.

The CDC has said the vaccinated spread covid just as easily as the unvaccinated. And studies in israel are showing natural immunity is several times more effective at preventing both covid and symtpomatic covid than double vaccination. By that logic, if I truly cared about grandma then the best I can do for her is to get infected and recover because just getting the vax alone might kill her.
Actually it is extremely effective at preventing symptoms (aka getting sick).

What it does little against is getting infected and being infectious.

That is why decent folk mask up.
 

FermentFred

Active Member
No, I've seen disinformation before, if the Lancet actually thought the CDC was lying they would say so publicly and forcefully. The CDC was briefly corrupted under Trump, but so was almost the entire US government, he did try to steal the election and fomented an insurrection against the republic. Also there's the matter of Health Canada and all the other government health agencies, it's like the big lie, the international media says the same thing as regular legitimate American media does. Only a few propaganda outlets are spinning the covid lie for profit, the suckers eat that shit right up.
Not the CDC, pfizer et. al. The lancet article explains how they used legalease to justify their "95% effective" stat, using a more useless statistic called relative risk reduction, or RRR, as compared to the much more useful stat ARR, or absoulute risk reduction. Which their peer reviewed study concluded was less than 2% for the best performing vaccine. Not the number j&j's marketing department wants being heard now is it?

Actually it is extremely effective at preventing symptoms (aka getting sick).

What it does little against is getting infected and being infectious.

That is why decent folk mask up.
Now you're moving the goalposts and admitting the vax is useless for the only reason they're forcing it on us, to help others. That's what I've said since the start. Tell me little nazi boy, are you still going to put me in camp for not getting the vax that does nothing to help anyone besides myself? May as well take someone's rights away for choosing to smoke or sky dive. My body my choice, facist.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Not the CDC, pfizer et. al. The lancet article explains how they used legalease to justify their "95% effective" stat, using a more useless statistic called relative risk reduction, or RRR, as compared to the much more useful stat ARR, or absoulute risk reduction. Which their peer reviewed study concluded was less than 2% for the best performing vaccine. Not the number j&j's marketing department wants being heard now is it?



Now you're moving the goalposts and admitting the vax is useless for the only reason they're forcing it on us, to help others. That's what I've said since the start. Tell me little nazi boy, are you still going to put me in camp for not getting the vax that does nothing to help anyone besides myself? May as well take someone's rights away for choosing to smoke or sky dive. My body my choice, facist.
drunk drivers have a 99% survival rate yet we have laws against it because it is a threat to others.......get it?! perhaps we should put a $10,000 bounty on un-vaxed ala Texas
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Not the CDC, pfizer et. al. The lancet article explains how they used legalease to justify their "95% effective" stat, using a more useless statistic called relative risk reduction, or RRR, as compared to the much more useful stat ARR, or absoulute risk reduction. Which their peer reviewed study concluded was less than 2% for the best performing vaccine. Not the number j&j's marketing department wants being heard now is it?



Now you're moving the goalposts and admitting the vax is useless for the only reason they're forcing it on us, to help others. That's what I've said since the start. Tell me little nazi boy, are you still going to put me in camp for not getting the vax that does nothing to help anyone besides myself? May as well take someone's rights away for choosing to smoke or sky dive. My body my choice, facist.
Real world data back them up and the data is in, end of argument, reality wins.
 
Top