Not the CDC, pfizer et. al. The lancet article explains how they used legalease to justify their "95% effective" stat, using a more useless statistic called relative risk reduction, or RRR, as compared to the much more useful stat ARR, or absoulute risk reduction. Which their peer reviewed study concluded was less than 2% for the best performing vaccine. Not the number j&j's marketing department wants being heard now is it?
Now you're moving the goalposts and admitting the vax is useless for the only reason they're forcing it on us, to help others. That's what I've said since the start. Tell me little nazi boy, are you still going to put me in camp for not getting the vax that does nothing to help anyone besides myself? May as well take someone's rights away for choosing to smoke or sky dive. My body my choice, facist.