UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's the other way around.
Would You Vote for Rand Paul Now? He's for legal MJ, and running for president
- Thread starter Sand4x105
- Start date
it's the other way around.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
OK, so he aligned himself with them. Then why would 2 democrats allow themselves to be aligned with Paul on this, if they didn't feel he was their equal partner? Or at least a deserving partner?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they have no choice you dullard.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Name calling, so early in the evening Buck?
that was not name calling, it was an apt description.
i don't get mad when people call me tall, because i am tall.
deal with it, murdoch.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
You're showing your bias toward anything right of center Buck, by refusing to give any credit at all to a conservative who deserves it; albeit just in this case.
I ain't promoting him for president. I'm just saying he deserves credit in this one case. This one little case.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
I'm very disappointed Buck that I'm not in your signature quotes.
see4
Well-Known Member
@TBoneJack - Actually, Rendy Pawl is the one doing the [re]aligning. The representatives of the people, the 2 Democrats, wrote a bill that would benefit the good of the people, and Rendy recognized an opportunity to potentially get "swing" votes, that's all. The Democrats are not dropping the bill because of some stupid political squabble, thats a Republican thing to do. Maybe this concept is a little over your head?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're as delusional as any of the rest though, murdoch.
you dumb racist sock puppet 9-time loser.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
Maybe you're right, sir. Maybe Paul just tagged himself along like a fucking leach. But that's not what was reported in the mainstream news stories I read.
I had pegged you as someone who was above personal insults toward someone who had never thrown any at you. And hopefully you are?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
finally you get it, murdoch.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
Nice job of partially quoting me, Buck. You should have been a lawyer. You would have done well...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
as a RIU internet lawyer, i honestly feel you should agree to put yourself on trial for the charge of serial sock puppetry and agree to be judged by a RIU jury of your RIU peers.
if you are found guilty of serial sock puppetry, you get banned.
the evidence against you is overwhelming, and you know this.
do you agree?
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
So you wanna rig up some tribunal against me in advance and expect me to agree to a "fair trial"?
Let's see, a jury of you and pin and abandon and travis and sky and see4 and ... yeah, right.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
So you wanna rig up some tribunal against me in advance and expect me to agree to a "fair trial"?
Let's see, a jury of you and pin and abandon and travis and sky and see4 and ... yeah, right.
Don't forget NAMBLA.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
So you wanna rig up some tribunal against me in advance and expect me to agree to a "fair trial"?
Let's see, a jury of you and pin and abandon and travis and sky and see4 and ... yeah, right.
you would be allowed to assist in your own defense, which has so far consisted of "NUH UH!" and not much else.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
My defense is impeccable sir. Consistent and impeccable.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why do you have the exact same rhetoric as all of these previous sock puppets identified with the murdoch account then?
Similar threads
