you have to pay $13.50 to vote in pennsylvania

nontheist

Well-Known Member
had no idea mississippi was in pennsylvania, and that IDs would have any affect on absentee ballots where no ID is presented.

you getting tired of failing there, socky mcsocdouche?
You're the one that said it doesn't exist, granted its absentee ballots maybe its a good idea to get rid of those also. This is a national election states shouldn't matter, only the fact that fraud takes place and we should do our best to prevent it.
 

InCognition

Active Member
Doesn't surprise me.

There will probably be a $5,000 tax for any firearm to be purchased in the USA, at some point in time. It won't be viewed as unconstitutional though, because the supreme court will just label it as a "tax" or any other bogus fee they conjure up.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're the one that said it doesn't exist, granted its absentee ballots maybe its a good idea to get rid of those also. This is a national election states shouldn't matter, only the fact that fraud takes place and we should do our best to prevent it.
i quoted the people who argued for the law in PA, they are the ones who said they had no cases of it.

get rid of absentee ballots? that's a nice "fuck you" to the soldiers.

you fail so hard. i'm thinking it's the fist up your ass. i imagine it would be difficult to think straight with a fist up the ass like you have.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Doesn't surprise me.

There will probably be a $5,000 tax for any firearm to be purchased in the USA, at some point in time. It won't be viewed as unconstitutional though, because the supreme court will just label it as a "tax" or any other bogus fee they conjure up.
romney raised the fee for owning/registering firearms in MA from $25 to $100. this is how he makes the claim that he didn't raise taxes. he raised lots and lots and lots of fees, which hurt the little guy more than the big guy. balancing the budget on the backs of those who can least afford it.

good times.
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
i quoted the people who argued for the law in PA, they are the ones who said they had no cases of it.

get rid of absentee ballots? that's a nice "fuck you" to the soldiers.

you fail so hard. i'm thinking it's the fist up your ass. i imagine it would be difficult to think straight with a fist up the ass like you have.
Well a few more cases like this absentee ballots will require a notary, will that be tax also? What if people do it for free? I know this is intellectually impossible for you to absorb but this is for you best interests. I believe a new Zimmerman thread was started for you to spill your nonsense in this one is for the big boys ok? When you can come back and act like a civilized adult then maybe we'll listen.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
LOL
I lost count at how many times UncleSnitchy used the words sock puppet, fisting, and dumbass. What a waste of bandwidth for a troll thread. Don't worry UB your daddy in law will buy you a license !!
speaking of sock puppets who fist dumbasses, how is brick top doing?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well a few more cases like this absentee ballots will require a notary, will that be tax also? What if people do it for free? I know this is intellectually impossible for you to absorb but this is for you best interests. I believe a new Zimmerman thread was started for you to spill your nonsense in this one is for the big boys ok? When you can come back and act like a civilized adult then maybe we'll listen.
sorry, i don't take advice on my manners from admitted sock puppets.

your supposition "if it was free" does not apply in this thread, as people need to fork over money to vote, which violates the 24th amendment.

seems like any literate adult could do the math on that one, civilized or not.
 

nontheist

Well-Known Member
sorry, i don't take advice on my manners from admitted sock puppets.

your supposition "if it was free" does not apply in this thread, as people need to fork over money to vote, which violates the 24th amendment.

seems like any literate adult could do the math on that one, civilized or not.
have an admin look into it.

i promise that i would have no problem admitting if it were me.

the only sock i've ever started was Fin shaggy.
Self hate much?
 

budlover13

King Tut
judge just upheld PA's voter ID law. up to 9% of the population doesn't have the ID required to vote, and they couldn't even find a case of voter fraud that ID would have stopped. not one.

so they just put a $13.50 poll tax in order to vote in PA. awesome news, right?
So you have to prove who you are to vote? The TRAVESTY!!!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you have to prove who you are to vote? The TRAVESTY!!!!!
the "travesty" is being required to pay a poll tax to vote. ever heard of the 24th amendment?

it's perfectly possible to prove your identity without being forced to pay an unconstitutional poll tax.

the irony is a pawl supporter supporting this, especially since many pawl supporters are young'uns or old coots, demographics who are disproportionately affected by these laws.
 

budlover13

King Tut
the "travesty" is being required to pay a poll tax to vote. ever heard of the 24th amendment?

it's perfectly possible to prove your identity without being forced to pay an unconstitutional poll tax.

the irony is a pawl supporter supporting this, especially since many pawl supporters are young'uns or old coots, demographics who are disproportionately affected by these laws.
So ID's should be free and subsidized Or should we go to say.... a SS# which costs nothing and STILL verifies elgibility?
 

Gyroscope

Well-Known Member
the "travesty" is being required to pay a poll tax to vote. ever heard of the 24th amendment?

it's perfectly possible to prove your identity without being forced to pay an unconstitutional poll tax.

the irony is a pawl supporter supporting this, especially since many pawl supporters are young'uns or old coots, demographics who are disproportionately affected by these laws.
How is it possible to prove it without picture ID ?

The Dems are the ones who commit the most voter fraud so what does him supporting "pawl" have to do with anything ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So ID's should be free and subsidized Or should we go to say.... a SS# which costs nothing and STILL verifies elgibility?
or you could just accept the documents which are required to get an ID and skip the whole poll tax thing. no need to make this more complicated than it has to be, it's not even broken so why are we trying to fix it?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member

  • it's perfectly possible to prove your identity without being forced to pay an unconstitutional poll tax.​




LOL!!!

If you dont have a drivers license or a state ID... How are you going to prove your identity? Green Card??

Dickhead...
 
Top