your favorite religious propaganda

U

ultraviolet pirate

Well-Known Member
religions are for people not yet strong enough to be spiritual. their beliefs do not frighten me to the point I have to ridicule them. im met some good folks who really believe, really do love jesus, and who would give the shirt off of their backs to anyone in need. on the flip side I met a muslim from Syria last year, I worked with him 12 hours a day five days a week for two months in hot burning sun. ...he was a decent guy and talked shit on islam, and even got high with me, but he wouldn't eat my porkchops. he told me "people take religion way too seriously"
 
Dalek Supreme

Dalek Supreme

Well-Known Member
ultraviolet pirate said:
religions are for people not yet strong enough to be spiritual. their beliefs do not frighten me to the point I have to ridicule them. im met some good folks who really believe, really do love jesus, and who would give the shirt off of their backs to anyone in need. on the flip side I met a muslim from Syria last year, I worked with him 12 hours a day five days a week for two months in hot burning sun. ...he was a decent guy and talked shit on islam, and even got high with me, but he wouldn't eat my porkchops. he told me "people take religion way too seriously"
Click to expand...
Religion is not needed for spirituality.

Religion is an infectious mental disorder,and holds mankind back as a whole.

Just take one whole look of this one page of this thread.

http://forum.grasscity.com/pandoras-box/1201905-religion-has-get-f-ck-out-here-14.html

I'm here to say that I can destroy 2 major psychotic world religions with one
historically factual paragraph.


"Crucifixion is a lie.The "tropaion" is a sacred trophy/sun symbol for the
ancient Greeks,and Romans.The tropaion was decorated with armor/weaponry,and was reserved for the spirits of there Gods to enter it.The trophy/victory symbol was displayed after a victorious battle in tribute to there Gods.Prisoners were bound at the base,and never ever placed on it for it is sacred inwich was reserved for divinity only.Julius Caesar held the title of Christos (annointed with oil),and his wax effigy was placed on it during the Ides of March."

The truth of the matter is history is distorted by the lie of the crucifixion perpetuated by a powerfull control freak organization.

The ancient Roman people would find it sacraligious to put anything not sacred like a prisoner on the Tropaion cross symbol.

In order for both Christianity,and islam to work they have to believe Jesus died on a cross at the hands of the ancient Romans inwich goes against historical facts of the symbols purpose.

This shows that Christians,and Muslims believe a total lie..........THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropaion
 

Attachments

mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
There's quite a bit of literary evidence that supports the claim that thousands of prisoners were indeed nailed to crucifix for punishment. I can find no scholarly work that supports the contention that equates tropaion and crucifixes.
 
Dalek Supreme

Dalek Supreme

Well-Known Member
mindphuk said:
There's quite a bit of literary evidence that supports the claim that thousands of prisoners were indeed nailed to crucifix for punishment. I can find no scholarly work that supports the contention that equates tropaion and crucifixes.
Click to expand...
The Romans were very symbolic,and I cannot find any epigraphy from that era of Jesus to support crucifixion.

I know people site literary references,and even though I cannot read ancient Greek,or Latin,I would like to see these references in actual form.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_Crown
(The Civic Crown was a chaplet of common oak leaves woven to form a crown. During the Roman Republic and the subsequent Principate, it was regarded as the second highest military decoration to which a citizen could aspire (the Grass Crown being held in higher regard). It was reserved for Roman citizens who saved the lives of fellow citizens by slaying an enemy on a spot not further held by the enemy that same day. The citizen saved must admit it; no one else could be a witness.)

I cannot see Roman soldiers would put something that resembled a symbol of honor on a prisoner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMVAUcFj3Aw
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
Plautus and Plutarch and Josephus. Crassus crucified 6,000 of Spartacus' men along the Via Appia. Appian of Alexandria wrote of this along with Plutarch.
 
Dalek Supreme

Dalek Supreme

Well-Known Member
Yes they say,but are they forgeries just like what was inserted into the writings of Josephus?
I do not trust from what I can numerously find examples of that contradict so called written history.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUKJ59FaZgU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XweLF886kmo

Did you ever hear of Caesar's comet?

Caesar's Comet Sidus Iulium (Chrestus Ressurectus)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Caesar (The comet during Caesar's funeral games that ressurected him into a God)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Ro (Emporer Constantine's Christogram modeled after the Julian star aka Caesar's comet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_hoc_signo_vinces ("in this, win" Emperor Constantine's motto from a vision he had.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzU4bPkWVyY

Why do so called pagan societies have biblical angels in there culture for the ancient Romans had Victoria,and
the ancient Greek's have Nike's.These are Biblical symbols not pagan...right?

Angels with wings in pagan settings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_(mythology)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nike_(mythology)
 

Attachments

Dalek Supreme

Dalek Supreme

Well-Known Member
mindphuk said:
Plautus and Plutarch and Josephus. Crassus crucified 6,000 of Spartacus' men along the Via Appia. Appian of Alexandria wrote of this along with Plutarch.
Click to expand...
Cremation makes more sense.

"Latin cremare(CREMO; “to cremate”), which was understood as the Greek term ; “to hang from”, “to suspend”; Christian: “to crucify”)"

Maybe to suspend over fire or pyre?

I have to look more into this possible ancient Greek/Latin mistranslation.

EDIT: Latin cremo means “to burn” and the
homophonous Greek kremô instead means “to hang”, “to crucify”.
CREMO : KREMÔ – KREM(omega symbol)

Ok this makes more sense both logisticly,and keeps prisoners from being placed on a sacred symbol the Tropaion when used publicly for victorious display.

Burning 6,000 rebellors saves time,and prevents flies from spreading disease from rotting corpses.

Burn them instead of putting them on a symbol reserved for divinity in the first place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropaion
 

Attachments

B

BLueRoux

Member
More of the Same fallacious nonsense from the new leader of the world's largest pedophile ring's first address to his "merry" (wink, wink) men in dresses and pointy hats:

"When one does not profess Jesus Christ - I recall the phrase of Leon Bloy – “Whoever does not pray to God, prays to the devil.” When one does not profess Jesus Christ, one professes the worldliness of the devil."


HipTip: Not buying into superstitions fictions doesn't signify allegiance to any of the fictional characters of those superstitious fictions.
 
B

BLueRoux

Member
I love how superstitious people make shit up when they are cornered with facts.

This is what pathological liars do. I have been able to find no difference between the two.

ThE sAtIvA hIgH said:
i actually asked a friend at work , who told me i was going to hell , how would i burn if i had no bones or flesh , and i was just a spirit, his answer was ( and he said it with sincerity ) 'the devil has a different kind of fire that can burn souls.'
Click to expand...
 
420neverforget

420neverforget

Member
Dr Kynes said:
just like in political theories, those who are unable to elucidate WHY they believe a particular way, and are unable to form a rational defense of their position are generally the poseurs and trend followers, the psuedo-_________ists.
Click to expand...
I disagree. Atheism isn't a belief. It is the lack of that. It is saying "I don't believe in a god". No claims are made and thus no explanation is required.

To me, you sound pretty arrogant. It is evident your only wish with this post was to express how much of a true atheist you are and how you didn't believe before it was cool. Give me a break.

Heisenberg said:
........
Forward this to increase their knowledge … or FAITH.


By the way, that student was EINSTEIN.
Click to expand...
I totally forgot what thread this was at first and was sure no one could take this "fwd:fwd:fwd:FWD:student proves GOD to professor" seriously
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
420neverforget said:
I disagree. Atheism isn't a belief. It is the lack of that. It is saying "I don't believe in a god". No claims are made and thus no explanation is required.

To me, you sound pretty arrogant. It is evident your only wish with this post was to express how much of a true atheist you are and how you didn't believe before it was cool. Give me a break.
Click to expand...
except im not an atheist. im a polytheist, i have many gods, but they dont run my life.

atheism has become a trendy position for those hipsters who wish to sound intellectual, or prove their independant bonafides, but atheism without a rational reason is still just blind faith, whether that faith is in preists rabbis ministers and mullahs, or noam chomsky, richard dawkins or vladimir lenin.

you seem to forget that the soviet union was also "Officially Atheist" and party members would go to great lengths to prove their lack of interest in religion, regardless of whether they actually disbelieved or not.

it's easy to put on the trappings of belief/disbelief, but without a logical, intellectually sound, and moral reason for either, both are simply a fashion show for others, which is what many "atheists" do, they put their atheism up front and center, as their glorious cruaders' tabbard and dare anyone to challenge them, much in the way many "religious" persons do with their faiths

your faith or lack thereof should be personal, internal, and private, not a sandwich board that challenges anyone from the other side to a fight.
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
except im not an atheist. im a polytheist, i have many gods, but they dont run my life.

atheism has become a trendy position for those hipsters who wish to sound intellectual, or prove their independant bonafides, but atheism without a rational reason is still just blind faith, whether that faith is in preists rabbis ministers and mullahs, or noam chomsky, richard dawkins or vladimir lenin.
Click to expand...
This is utter bullshit. Atheism is one thing, a lack of belief in any deities. The reason one is an atheist is inconsequential, whether it is through skeptical reasoning or mere naive atheism, where one hasn't been introduced to the god concept. They can have the exact same magical thinking as theists, as many people that believe in the New Age garbage, or crazy alien reptlian conspiracies, they are still technically atheists. There is absolutely no faith needed in the atheist position and those that come to it through skepticism and reason have certainly increased in number since the internet, especially youtube but to claim that it is somehow a hipster, pseudointellectual position, IMO needs some evidence beyond your personal perception.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top