captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
I like to read the entrails of a chicken before going out on the weekend, never can be too safe.
Nobody should prohibit you from doing that, but know Congress shall make no law respecting your chicken’s entrails, nor abridge my freedom of speech to tell you that’s an irrational way to make decisions, and may need a chaperone.I like to read the entrails of a chicken before going out on the weekend, never can be too safe.
And guess which ones are most likely to use assault rifles against their fellow citizens?I answered before researching. Now i found this.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/14/if-the-u-s-had-100-people-charting-americans-religious-affiliations/?amp=1
If the U.S. contained just 100 adults, 25 would be people who identify with evangelical Protestant denominations, 23 would be religiously unaffiliated and 21 would be Catholic. Just two would be Mormon, two would be Jewish and one would be Muslim.
And guess which ones are most likely to use assault rifles against their fellow citizens?
Let's deal with facts. You show me your god and I'll show you mine... Or are you like trump? Not really into facts...intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
I'm not the one who claims others beliefs are false or fictional...You are. You are the bigot. Enjoy the bed you made. I'm done, got nothing else for you or any bigots.
the ones forced to read this shit?And guess which ones are most likely to use assault rifles against their fellow citizens?
The monarchs are almost gone. You don't owe them anything either. Neither do I but I choose to try and help. Facts are the only way. Or do you flush....I don't owe you anything or anybody named Randy for that matter. You bigots are a sad group and I feel sorry for you all that think its okay to talk to people like the way you do. Point fingers at others all you want and laugh at others for what they believe and do.
Let's deal with facts
No I'm not. This is a political thread.To anyone who says to prove another persons God exists should first prove to that person that God doesn't exist. Obviously you cannot. Nobody is forcing any of you to believe in God, you are free to be Godless.
??? Were you telling anyone to prove their God's existence? If not, good on you, that is the way it should be regardless of where the thread or ? is.No I'm not. This is a political thread.