Zimmerman bond revoked

londonfog · Jun 12, 2012

Looks like the Zimm's old lady will be getting a perjury charge. http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/12/12189381-shellie-zimmerman-wife-of-trayvon-martin-killer-arrested-on-perjury-charge?lite

I wonder what else the Zimmerman's have lied about. Seems like it's part of the family trait. Will Shellie be allowed to use some of the money raise on the website to bond out.???? I also see that the Boy George has only 153 bucks on his books....That fat boy eating nice

budleydoright · Jun 12, 2012

how'd you like that mug staring at you every morning? ugh!

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

Harrekin said:
No I basically said he's an asshole for following and shooting someone. I also said I think he'll get away with it. Not taking sides cept the one that disagrees with murder.

We're all human here, no one agrees with murder. We just disagree that this was murder. Manslaughter, maybe, but not murder.

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

budleydoright said:
Have you ever seen someone who is being followed by the "authorities", the people following generally display an aggresive posture. You know they have that look that they mean business.

That's conjecture. We don't know how he appeared.

Harrekin · Jun 12, 2012

Red1966 said:
We're all human here, no one agrees with murder. We just disagree that this was murder. Manslaughter, maybe, but not murder.

He followed, approached and shot a kid (who was walking back from the shop, possibly stopped for a joint and a chat to his missus) in the chest with a hollow point 9mm...that's murder dude.

Ok so next time I bring the dog out for a stroll in the forest to get blitzed in the nature and walk around "like I'm on drugs" some dude can walk up, aggressively ask me what I'm doing and then shoot me if I object/try get him to fuck off?

Are you from planet loo-lah or something?

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

budleydoright said:
what were his intentions in following him then, Z has said he believed M was a perp, so when you are trying to keep someone from getting away with something your are trying to______________ them. M certainly didn't get away from the scene even though Z stated he was running away. If he was running away, Z had to ______________ up, before he could ________ him. A. Catch B. Kill C. Fuck D. Control

Since he said, on the 911 tape, "They always get away." he may already resigned himself that M would get away. Your attempt to frame this as a multiple choice question where all the choices are slanted ain't going to cut it.

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2012

Red1966 said:
Since he said, on the 911 tape, "They always get away." he may already resigned himself that M would get away.

that must have been why he told police to call him for his location, and not to meet him at the location he had previously described. :dunce:

you're so fucking dumb that you make my chickens look smart.

MuyLocoNC · Jun 12, 2012

Harrekin said:
He followed, approached and shot a kid (who was walking back from the shop, possibly stopped for a joint and a chat to his missus) in the chest with a hollow point 9mm...that's murder dude.

Ok so next time I bring the dog out for a stroll in the forest to get blitzed in the nature and walk around "like I'm on drugs" some dude can walk up, aggressively ask me what I'm doing and then shoot me if I object/try get him to fuck off?

Are you from planet loo-lah or something?

It's awesome that you've joined the lynch mob and can now say with psychic authority, exactly what happened in the moments before the shooting. I think I'll go ahead and wait and see how it pans out in court.

You'll notice the DA didn't charge George with perjury, so absolutely NOTHING has changed as far as I can see. She allegedly lied under oath, if they can convict her, good for them. The only thing it changes in this case is the amount of Zimmerman's bond.

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
It's awesome that you've joined the lynch mob and can now say with psychic authority, exactly what happened in the moments before the shooting. I think I'll go ahead and wait and see how it pans out in court.

You'll notice the DA didn't charge George with perjury, so absolutely NOTHING has changed as far as I can see. She allegedly lied under oath, if they can convict her, good for them. The only thing it changes in this case is the amount of Zimmerman's bond.

zimmerette has also testified about zimmerboy's character, tried to downplay violent history under oath, etc.

that's all shit heap now too.

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

budleydoright said:
The physical evidence? This was investigated with the presumption of Martins guilt and Zimmerman the victim, even then the officers said they saw holes in the story. If he would have accidently run M over in his car there have been a more thorough investigation done.

It's hard to downplay the gashes to the back of Z's head, the broken nose, the grass stains on his back. the bruised knuckles that M had, the lack of any injuries indicating an assault on M's body (other than a single, fatal gunshot wound fired from point blank range). These all indicate the incident occurred as Z stated. None of the witnesses statements at the time indicated Z's statements were false. M's father, when played the 911 tape, said that was NOT HIS SON calling for help. After consulting his attorney, and only after, he stated otherwise. You want to dismiss the physical evidence (I see by your later posts) and go with Z killed M because he's a racist and Z's a racist because he killed M. Circular logic.

Harrekin · Jun 12, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
It's awesome that you've joined the lynch mob and can now say with psychic authority, exactly what happened in the moments before the shooting. I think I'll go ahead and wait and see how it pans out in court.

You'll notice the DA didn't charge George with perjury, so absolutely NOTHING has changed as far as I can see. She allegedly lied under oath, if they can convict her, good for them. The only thing it changes in this case is the amount of Zimmerman's bond.

Zimmermans case depends entirely on his word, which has been proven to be false every step of the way.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

budleydoright said:
The physical evidence? This was investigated with the presumption of Martins guilt and Zimmerman the victim, even then the officers said they saw holes in the story. If he would have accidently run M over in his car there have been a more thorough investigation done.

The officers saw holes in the story and presumed he was innocent?

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2012

Red1966 said:
It's hard to downplay the gashes to the back of Z's head, the broken nose, the grass stains on his back. the bruised knuckles that M had, the lack of any injuries indicating an assault on M's body (other than a single, fatal gunshot wound fired from point blank range). These all indicate the incident occurred as Z stated. None of the witnesses statements at the time indicated Z's statements were false. M's father, when played the 911 tape, said that was NOT HIS SON calling for help. After consulting his attorney, and only after, he stated otherwise. You want to dismiss the physical evidence (I see by your later posts) and go with Z killed M because he's a racist and Z's a racist because he killed M. Circular logic.

i see it's computer time at the nursing home again. get ready for the cascade of replies.

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2012

Red1966 said:
The officers saw holes in the story and presumed he was innocent?

the officers took him at his word and serino found contradictions in zimm's story.

maybe try being familiar with the case. that would be a good start for you.

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

budleydoright said:
how'd you like that mug staring at you every morning? ugh!

So post pictures of your wife, so we can better judge your character.

desert dude · Jun 12, 2012

Harrekin said:
Zimmermans case depends entirely on his word, which has been proven to be false every step of the way.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

I think you are just bored and trolling, but... The only lie, and that is debatable, I have seen is the statement about the defense fund. Are there more?

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2012

desert dude said:
I think you are just bored and trolling, but... The only lie, and that is debatable, I have seen is the statement about the defense fund. Are there more?

they are blacked out right now, but based on the tales papa zimm and brozimm were telling, some lies got told somewhere along the way. like the "he was just walking back to his truck" one. or the "he was looking for an address behind the houses one". or how about the whole "he was trying to inch my way to the grass" one?

LOL!

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

Harrekin said:
He followed, approached and shot a kid (who was walking back from the shop, possibly stopped for a joint and a chat to his missus) in the chest with a hollow point 9mm...that's murder dude. Ok so next time I bring the dog out for a stroll in the forest to get blitzed in the nature and walk around "like I'm on drugs" some dude can walk up, aggressively ask me what I'm doing and then shoot me if I object/try get him to fuck off? Are you from planet loo-lah or something?

If it occurred exactly as you said, and only as you said, that would be murder. But we already know, by EVERYBODY"S account that it did not happen that way. The insult at the end will end our conversation.

desert dude · Jun 12, 2012

UncleBuck said:
they are blacked out right now, but based on the tales papa zimm and brozimm were telling, some lies got told somewhere along the way. like the "he was just walking back to his truck" one. or the "he was looking for an address behind the houses one". or how about the whole "he was trying to inch my way to the grass" one?

LOL!

Assuming facts not in evidence. Sorry.

Red1966 · Jun 12, 2012

UncleBuck said:
i see it's computer time at the nursing home again. get ready for the cascade of replies.

Butt's got a head start.

Zimmerman bond revoked

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member