Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
And if I am not teaching anyone then how come this was said
Learn something new every day around here!
Learn something new every day around here!
Beef, you havent posted in a few days.[video=youtube_share;oAKG-kbKeIo]http://youtu.be/oAKG-kbKeIo[/video]
Do any of you read before replying?I really don't read your posts much anymore, it's too frustrating. You are apparently a bottomless pit of misinformation.... however, your reasoning that the use of white marble somehow was used to whitewash him is ludicrous and just wrong on so many levels it's truly amazing.
Everybody is wrong sometimes. Again, it's you "teaching" that is a scary proposition.
do you think before you make any of your statements? you implied the "more reasonable tone" was purposeful, otherwise what was your point?Do any of you read before replying?
I never said that white marble was used to change history. I simply said that when you look at pictures of black statues it looks more reasonably toned.
Those are two very drastically different statements, and I only said one of them.
My point was that the black statue looks right, not that the white statue must have been chosen so we would think he was white.do you think before you make any of your statements? you implied the "more reasonable tone" was purposeful, otherwise what was your point?
What you think 'looks right' is irrelevant because you're not an authority. I'm positive there are good reasons (based on actual evidence not just an opinion) that historians generally regard Socrates as Caucasian, not black.My point was that the black statue looks right, not that the white statue must have been chosen so we would think he was white.
Are you even part of your own argument, or am I the only one that knows what you said 2 posts ago? Because I feel like you are not only ignoring what I say, but what you have said. You are ignoring yourself
Again, you are not proving anything. I actually listed my reasons, I didn't just say they were up my sleeves. I SHOWED you and told you how it makes complete sense.you're not an authority. I'm positive there are good reasons (based on actual evidence not just an opinion) that historians generally regard Socrates as Caucasian, not black.
I'll just cut to the chase, try reading the actual thread before replying.I'll just cut to the chase: what is your source material?
Dude, you are the one that needs facts. You came in here proving NOTHING. Watch the fucking video before telling me what it is and what it is not.Source material please. Intuition IS NOT research. No I don't read your sophistry anymore, and won't give it ANY credence until you say where you "learned" this.
Right back at ya Mr. "I'm positive scientists have reasons for thinking he's white"Source material?
I said that Santa and Jesus and many others would come up as well.Do you know any greeks? Have you seen a greek? Saint nick is NOT socrates.