A tax analogy, who's really paying their fair share?

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
the koch brothers undoubtedly love seeing subway employees defend paying more taxes than them.
Lets travel down that road for a moment, shall we.

I spent the first part of this year getting sober, not trusting myself with a dollar in my pocket. When I felt it was time, I got a job. To get a better job, you have to have a job to start with. So I chose subway.

I made $8 for each and every hour I worked. Not much money, at all. I would say its typical of someone working at such places. If one works 40 horus a week, every week of the year that is under $17k annual income. In reality, with a few days off here and there, the income is probably under $16k.

A person with such an income pays no taxes. They usually get more back on their income tax refund than they paid in. Usually its enough to cover even the FICA taxes withheld on their checks also. When you count the food stamps they are also on, and the medicare, and all the other "lets give shit away that isnt ours" programs the Democrats have enacted over the years, taxes are a source of income for people who work at places like subway, rather than a liability.

I didn't work most of this year, so even though my income has gone way up, it only started in November. So I will be getting much more than I paid in this year. Next year, it will be a different story.

But my point is, with all the programs out there for the poor, they are not taxed. They have deductions from their pay check, but that and then some is given back to them after they file their taxes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
But my point is, with all the programs out there for the poor, they are not taxed.
minus the property taxes, sales, taxes, gas taxes, taxes on their electric, phone bill, gas bill and other bills, payroll taxes, and whatever of their income and state taxes don't get refunded to them.

but yeah, besides all of that, you're right on.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
minus the property taxes, sales, taxes, gas taxes, taxes on their electric, phone bill, gas bill and other bills, payroll taxes, and whatever of their income and state taxes don't get refunded to them.

but yeah, besides all of that, you're right on.
What you are talking about there are mostly local/state taxes.

The federal government has tiny tiny tiny add on for gasoline.

But were talking national tax policy here, so your post is about as relevant as the number of hairs growing on my scrotum.

I lol at your fail. Its so pathetic.

The only thing federal, and therefor relevant, in that list you gave is the payroll tax. Here is how pathetic or ignorant you are. You are using a different name for something I debunked/addressed in an earlier post. The "payroll taxes" are also known as FICA. FICA taxes are refunded indirectly through the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Now, here is something that makes our tax system terribly regressive. Take a guy making $100k a year, and a guy making $2million a year. Did you know they pay the same payroll (FICA) taxes?

Not exactly the same, the cap is somewhere barely over 100k. So basically, you only pay FICA taxes on the first 100k of your income.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What you are talking about there are mostly local/state taxes.

The federal government has tiny tiny tiny add on for gasoline.

But were talking national tax policy here, so your post is about as relevant as the number of hairs growing on my scrotum.

I lol at your fail. Its so pathetic.

The only thing federal, and therefor relevant, in that list you gave is the payroll tax. Here is how pathetic or ignorant you are. You are using a different name for something I debunked/addressed in an earlier post. The "payroll taxes" are also known as FICA. FICA taxes are refunded indirectly through the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Now, here is something that makes our tax system terribly regressive. Take a guy making $100k a year, and a guy making $2million a year. Did you know they pay the same payroll (FICA) taxes?

Not exactly the same, the cap is somewhere barely over 100k. So basically, you only pay FICA taxes on the first 100k of your income.
OMFG, is the subway employee just talking to hear himself talk now?

we all know where the payroll tax ends. i've been talking about raising the cap for years now.

jesus christ this kid is fucking insufferable.
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
We always argue about who is paying their fair share...

When are we going to start arguing about government spending it's fair share???
The podium is yours, and I am here to be your audience.
Tell me more about this "fair share" and how you define it.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
OMFG, is the subway employee just talking to hear himself talk now?

we all know where the payroll tax ends. i've been talking about raising the cap for years now.

jesus christ this kid is fucking insufferable.
Do you know why there is a cap? It's cause there is a cap on social security benefits. Do you want people to be getting $14k and larger monthly ssi checks?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Do you know why there is a cap? It's cause there is a cap on social security benefits. Do you want people to be getting $14k and larger monthly ssi checks?
only the lowest of subway employees would not understand what a liberal means when he refers to raising the cap on SS to keep it funded.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
only the lowest of subway employees would not understand what a liberal means when he refers to raising the cap on SS to keep it funded.
There are many areas of social security that could be seen as a cap. Your just a moron incapable of a protracted discussion that involves critical thought.

Fucking idiot.
 

beenthere

New Member
FICA is not a tax to employees, only employers.
Employees pay 1/2 towards this federal insurance, in hopes they will someday be able to collect.
Employers pay the other half, something they will never be able to collect on, therefore it's a tax to them.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
FICA is not a tax to employees, only employers.
Employees pay 1/2 towards this federal insurance, in hopes they will someday be able to collect.
Employers pay the other half, something they will never be able to collect on, therefore it's a tax to them.
You are totally right, but it is still a tax. Is your position that it isn't a true tax because if you don't die you will be given social security benefits at a specific age?

That is pretty much the definition of a tax, a forced collection of money to be used by government to provide services.

But I see what your saying about the employer, they should not have to pay any of it.
 

beenthere

New Member
You are totally right, but it is still a tax. Is your position that it isn't a true tax because if you don't die you will be given social security benefits at a specific age?

That is pretty much the definition of a tax, a forced collection of money to be used by government to provide services.

But I see what your saying about the employer, they should not have to pay any of it.
It's a hard one to pin down when it comes to employee contributions.
I don't know of any tax that is structured in this way. Every tax I know of, once it's paid, you don't get a chance to get any of it back.

And before anyone brings up witholdings, that's quite a different story. The money the government withholds is not considered a tax until you file a return, only then does the government asses your contributions and it becomes a tax.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
It's a hard one to pin down when it comes to employee contributions.
I don't know of any tax that is structured in this way. Every tax I know of, once it's paid, you don't get a chance to get any of it back.

And before anyone brings up witholdings, that's quite a different story. The money the government withholds is not considered a tax until you file a return, only then does the government asses your contributions and it becomes a tax.
Well, you are right, that is the one that is the most direct in terms of paying it and getting it back. However, it is a social service. All other taxes (are supposed to) are used to provide things for the common good of society. Roads, military, you know all the shit the government 'provides' for us. It is all funded by taxation.

Social Security is a service just like roads are. Without it there would be a lot of homeless old people shitting in your front yard. It enables them to have a place to live when they get old and useless.
 

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
Without it there would be a lot of homeless old people shitting in your front yard.
Ya'll know me. Still the same OG. But, I been low key. Hated on by most of these niggas with no cheese. No deals, and no keys. No wheels, and no keys.

Mad at me because I got a crib with a studio, with a wall full of plaques.

Ya'll really think I'mma let my dough freeze. Bitch please. You better bow down on both knees.

Who the fuck you think taught you to smoke trees? Who you think brought you the oldies? Ice Cubes, Easy E's...DOC's, the Snoop D`o double G's..And, the group that said MOTHER FUCK THE POLICE!

And when your album sales weren't doing too good, who's the doc they told you to go see?
 

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
Ya ya, I'm just trying to say, All I know is I'm upstairs listenin' to my will smith CD, and...Then i seen all these flames goin errywhere...

Shit, Hold on a minute bitch. Aye, Detroit, what? Detroit what?!

And when the cops came through me and dre stood next to a burned down house, with a can full of gas, and a hand full of matches, and still wasn't found out.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
A stupid Analogy. The poor got a 12 oz glass of beer the others hot two or three. The rich fella got ten tankards of the finest ale
. He owed more because he drank the most. In reality the others subsidized the rich guys habit.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
A stupid Analogy. The poor got a 12 oz glass of beer the others hot two or three. The rich fella got ten tankards of the finest ale
. He owed more because he drank the most. In reality the others subsidized the rich guys habit.
A consumption tax, like the FairTax, would go a long way into solving this by being more of a tax on wealth than a tax on income.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
A consumption tax, like the FairTax, would go a long way into solving this by being more of a tax on wealth than a tax on income.
ginwilly got owned by canna sylvan for preaching that same line of nonsense. it is mathematically retarded to advance that line of nonsense.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
ginwilly got owned by canna sylvan for preaching that same line of nonsense. it is mathematically retarded to advance that line of nonsense.
I am prepared to debate the merits of the FairTax.

Please demonstrate to me the mathematical retardation?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
IPlease demonstrate to me the mathematical retardation?
you said that a consumption tax is a tax on wealth.

as income approaches infinity (wealth), the effective rate of taxation approaches zero.

as income approaches zero, the effective rate of taxation approaches 100% (your prebate is as retarded as your 32% rate of taxation, so spare me).

the "fair" tax is not a tax on wealth, it is a regressive tax on the middle class and poor.

but you work at subway, so of course you don't understand such basic math about the asinine package of goods that you bought.

fool.
 
Top