Global Warming is a Myth, Rush Limbaugh said so!!!

Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Could you even imagine if there was a computer model that agreed with this "effect?" It would be Front Page Celebrity, Big Time News. It would have a name like Watson or something. We would all know it and I would be agreeing will the tree huggers. But, when I dug in to the study, like I do...no beef. No model. All talk and statistics and conflicting data sets.

A Hot Gaia Model, could you imagine? It would be all you Saganists would need. Don't you know they have worked their asses off on this for the last 30 years?

No there, there.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Could you even imagine if there was a computer model that agreed with this "effect?" It would be Front Page Celebrity, Big Time News. It would have a name like Watson or something. We would all know it and I would be agreeing will the tree huggers. But, when I dug in to the study, like I do...no beef. No model. All talk and statistics and conflicting data sets.

A Hot Gaia Model, could you imagine? It would be all you Saganists would need. Don't you know they have worked their asses off on this for the last 30 years?

No there, there.
Click to expand...

If there were a model that agreed with the effect, and agreed with the time line, the naysayers would call it a coincidence or pseudoscience. There is no data or evidence that will change their minds.
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Could you even imagine if there was a computer model that agreed with this "effect?" It would be Front Page Celebrity, Big Time News. It would have a name like Watson or something. We would all know it and I would be agreeing will the tree huggers. But, when I dug in to the study, like I do...no beef. No model. All talk and statistics and conflicting data sets.

A Hot Gaia Model, could you imagine? It would be all you Saganists would need. Don't you know they have worked their asses off on this for the last 30 years?

No there, there.
Click to expand...
I find it humorous that you think yourself some type of expert on global warming and are demanding computer models. LOL
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
NLXSK1 said:
As I have already clearly stated. It does not matter what the trend will be.

We need to focus on adaptation to a world that has demonstrable differences in average temperature over significant periods of time.
Click to expand...
I think the chances are better than even that we'll see a step in the trend: demonstrable and consequential differences in a geologically insignificant period of time.

Oh certainly we will adapt, but not easily or happily. Maintaining the fiction of civilization itself might very well be put to the test. I fear for my children, and theirs.

I disagree that it won't matter. i think it will matter terribly on the human scale.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
canndo said:
If there were a model that agreed with the effect, and agreed with the time line, the naysayers would call it a coincidence or pseudoscience. There is no data or evidence that will change their minds.
Click to expand...
Bullshit...just burrow the bird brain deeper in the sand with this immature logic.

If there was science backed with models like all other disciplines you all would not be so pissy about it. All that scorn shows your fear, is all.

It there were models it would mean we understand it a bit. If models would be accepted your silly worldview would not seem so farfetched.. Why no models. Dumbass over there acts like models are something extraordinary to be demand. Tard.

Oh and all you got is taunting, biscuit boy, you fat failure.

Since you shout the world down already with this, your polices is against research on modeling. That is a fact.

It show you are wrong and afraid. Why else get so pissy like a bitch?
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
I think the chances are better than even that we'll see a step in the trend: demonstrable and consequential differences in a geologically insignificant period of time.

Oh certainly we will adapt, but not easily or happily. Maintaining the fiction of civilization itself might very well be put to the test. I fear for my children, and theirs.

I disagree that it won't matter. i think it will matter terribly on the human scale.
Click to expand...
I dont mean matter as in matter to humans.

I mean matter as in we cannot cause it to stop or reverse.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
What was it? can you tell me in a way that won't obligate me to delete it? Your challenge, should you choose to accept it ... ( ← ooo. Ellipsis!)
Click to expand...
it was something tame but out of context to make chesus look bad. quote 1 was chesus describing the age difference between his wife and he, the second quote was an out of context quote where chesus was quoting someone else.

i told him i didn't think it would last another day, it didn't.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
it was something tame but out of context to make chesus look bad. quote 1 was chesus describing the age difference between his wife and he, the second quote was an out of context quote where chesus was quoting someone else.

i told him i didn't think it would last another day, it didn't.
Click to expand...
How long is your purple penis going to last?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
If there was science backed with models like all other disciplines you all would not be so pissy about it....It there were models it would mean we understand it a bit. If models would be accepted your silly worldview would not seem so farfetched.. Why no models. Dumbass over there acts like models are something extraordinary to be demand. Tard.

Oh and all you got is taunting, biscuit boy, you fat failure.

Since you shout the world down already with this, your polices is against research on modeling. That is a fact.

It show you are wrong and afraid. Why else get so pissy like a bitch?
Click to expand...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=97







 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
NLXSK1 said:
How long is your purple penis going to last?
Click to expand...
~cannot resist~ When you awoke this morning, did you imagine yourself saying that to another man?

NLXSK1 said:
I dont mean matter as in matter to humans.

I mean matter as in we cannot cause it to stop or reverse.
Click to expand...
On a more sober note, this casts the difference in our articles of faith into sharp relief. You accept as immutable axiom that man has no effect on the planet. I accept ... I daresay i observe ... that man does. So I maintain that not only are we causing a problem of indeterminate extent, we have the capacity and duty to reverse it to some degree to be determined by a not yet quantified intersection of immediate and long-term cost.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
~cannot resist~ When you awoke this morning, did you imagine yourself saying that to another man?



On a more sober note, this casts the difference in our articles of faith into sharp relief. You accept as immutable axiom that man has no effect on the planet. I accept ... I daresay i observe ... that man does. So I maintain that not only are we causing a problem of indeterminate extent, we have the capacity and duty to reverse it to some degree to be determined by a not yet quantified intersection of immediate and long-term cost.
Click to expand...
*sigh*

You must have misread me again.

First of all, why is it a problem again? This 1-2 degree warming? You have concluded somehow that it is a problem. But we can show that the climate has changed on a cyclical basis from the beginning of geological history. Therefore the planet has had a *problem* since it was created right?

I dont necessarily consider temperature change to be a problem considering it is a demonstrable and natural cycle on the earth.

So yes, we definitely disagree that temperature change is a *problem*

I am not sure why we have a duty to reverse it or stop it. Considering it has been happening long before we were here we cannot possibly be the cause of a majority of it.

In addition, I am not sure there is an immediate nor long term cost. None of that has been demonstrated by any scientist I have heard of up to this date.

Oceans rise and fall. Erosion happens. The earth is built up and wears down. The planet is in a constant state of change and/or flux.

Your proposal seems based on reversing or stopping the natural order of the planet.

I dont think we are capable nor knowledgeable enough to start terraforming the planet without further data.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
What was it? can you tell me in a way that won't obligate me to delete it? Your challenge, should you choose to accept it ... ( ← ooo. Ellipsis!)
Click to expand...
In the first quote
I show the age difference between me and my wife in the second quote
He took a statement by Phil Robertson i had posted that said
"Marry them young and make them dependant on you"

Phil Robertson was advocating marrying girls when they are 15 or 16, basically making them dependant so they can "clean your ducks"

When Robertson married his wife He was 20 she was 16. He was banging her when he was 18 and she was 14. I dont think it relates since my wife was already 21 at the time and attending college.

On a side note. I never reported it to the mods. Maybe he seen the error of his ways
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top