I suggest you provide the citation. The Internet is full of highly-polished cant. Let us judge the quality of the source ourselves.
My issue was your claim that it was started as a racist southern thing. It was just a common term used by all. I think it lived on past it's acceptable usage by the racist south, but it was not originally considered offensive.
Of course that's not what I mean, hopefully you know better than that.
My point was that the United Negro College Fund was most likely not started by a bunch of racist southerners.
So if.slave owners happened to call their slaves at the time blacks, black would now be considered an offensive term today?Maybe the term Negro is offensive becuase during the slave days
No one owned a African American or a black person
They owned Negros
Yes I think you are getting it.So if.slave owners happened to call their slaves at the time blacks, black would now be considered an offensive term today?
What if they called slaves cool mambo jambo? Would cool mambo jambo now be considered offensive ?
IMO, I think you're reaching a bit..
But in the days of slavery nobody was called African American, not even free blacks. As mentioned earlier, Negro was of Spanish or Portugal origin and was NOT derogatory. Like the term Mulatto, we have turned it into an offensive term, that was not the original intent.Maybe the term Negro is offensive becuase during the slave days
No one owned a African American or a black person
They owned Negros
Completely agreed..Seems to me that the fallout from a couple of decades of PC thought police goose stepping through our society has precipitated rampant hypersensitivity.
I think that we all had thicker skins before the advent of PC cops, regardless of melanin content!
At one time Nigger and Slave Owner werent derogatory terms either.But in the days of slavery nobody was called African American, not even free blacks. As mentioned earlier, Negro was of Spanish or Portugal origin and was NOT derogatory. Like the term Mulatto, we have turned it into an offensive term, that was not the original intent.
No, I'm not.. you had to call them something, yes or no?Yes I think you are getting it.
The majority of blacks think the term is offensiveNo, I'm not.. you had to call them something, yes or no?
What makes the term you called them offensive ? I'm kinda lost here?
I understand nigger is.offensive as it was meant to be an offensive word out of the gate but I don't think negro was the ever designed to be offensive, just descriptive for a group of people..
Is the term caucasian also offensive? How about Indian?
Cracker yes, wet back yes, nigger yes, chink yes.. gook yes.. negro again no.. it was never an offensive term, in fact it was the go to inoffensive term.. surely people used nigger years ago and people who weren't racist assholes would use the term negro in its place .. how do you not grasp this?
If I wanted to be a racist fuck, which I'm not, I'm sure I could come up with way more offensive words then negro ffs..Hillbilly used to be defined in Websters as a northern Michigan farmer. It's now used in a derogatory intent so I get where people are coming from concerning the word negro.
I wouldn't call a northern MI farmer a hillbilly anymore than I would use the term negro. The term redneck used to refer to the color scarfs that union coal miners wore and was a status symbol being a union worker instead of non-union.
We can make any word offensive if we choose to.
How do you know blacks think its offensive ? Have you taken a pole ?The majority of blacks think the term is offensive
You still going to defend using it?
yep, it's all intent.At one time Nigger and Slave Owner werent derogatory terms either.
Times change
If you dont think it is offensive then by all means next time you see a black person or persons. SayHow do you know blacks think its offensive ? Have you taken a pole ?
And I'm not defending it, I'm just saying I don't think it's offensive ..
amenIf I wanted to be a racist fuck, which I'm not, I'm sure I could come up with way more offensive words then negro ffs..
While Buck is lecturing you about the PC way to discuss abortion and wagging his finger about asking loaded questions such as, "are you for or against killing innocent unborn babies", he will then proceed to ask you:To the colorized, I disagree.
Firstly, "unborn babies" is an oxymoron.
Secondly, "innocent babies" is a blatant emotional loading of the question.
So i do not think they are the same question at all, unless the respondent has existing moral issues with abortion.
Mind you, I am not criticizing the having of moral issues, but I don't think the value judgment should so slyly be positioned as universal or default. Jmo.