UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
nice sig. that's something a white separatist would say.Your post was exactly what I expected from you.
the bible and racism: they go together like dr. pepper and trout!
nice sig. that's something a white separatist would say.Your post was exactly what I expected from you.
And if I was a white separatist, then what Buck? You gonna trash talk more? Oh nose, please say it aint so.nice sig. that's something a white separatist would say.
the bible and racism: they go together like dr. pepper and trout!
Jesus was black.....could your tax free income possibly buy a clue?nice sig. that's something a white separatist would say.
the bible and racism: they go together like dr. pepper and trout!
EVERYONE says they care about the environment, and of course everyone does, except when preserving it costs money, or time, then the only people who care are those who are affected. Conservatives care, but they aren't about to outlaw the burning of coal, after all, that costs money.Canndo...I'm not a righty stereotype.
The pretense of the op assumes rightys in general just don't care about the environment...correct?
Correct me if I am wrong but germans have very few dui's.
So I suppose if, a very BIG IF, responsibility is still disregarded...then either of the two scenarios would still be much cheaper options.
and of course this assumes if a child is in trouble, the state MUST step in or even is the most suitable arbitrator.
I have seen the best care to troubled children come from other responsible moms, no state required.
so an unashamed racist and a bible thumper.And if I was a white separatist, then what Buck? You gonna trash talk more? Oh nose, please say it aint so.
nothing to say? Maybe make something up then. Fuck, post a meme or something, quick!so an unashamed racist and a bible thumper.
hmmmmm. interesting.
i had a conversion and now i agree with you.Um, nothing to say? AH damn, maybe make something up then. Fuck, post a meme or something, quick!
no, i agree with you. jesus agrees with you. god agrees with you. why the fuck would god be wrong? he said separating cultures works best right in the bible. jesus even said something about loving thy neighbor, unless thy neighbor happens to be of a different culture.If its racist to you, whatever it is, then that sounds like a personal problem. Deal with it, bucky. You could shout it from the rooftops, hell I'm even helping hold a fucking banner for you (sig), and it still wont make a bit of differnce or change my opinion one bit.
Wheres that meme?
Two people who never meet could never have a disagreement, but two people in a room will always find a reason to fight. In any circumstance, the best recourse to avoid furhter disagreement would be to seperate these people, derp.no, i agree with you. jesus agrees with you. god agrees with you. why the fuck would god be wrong? he said separating cultures works best right in the bible. jesus even said something about loving thy neighbor, unless thy neighbor happens to be of a different culture.
nothing racist about it. the bible says so, and the bible is the ultimate thing we should look to when making decisions about things like this.
i believe that's what jesus taught and thus you are right because jesus said white separtism is not racist so you're not racist and you're right.Two people who never meet could never have a disagreement, but two people in a room will always find a reason to fight. In any circumstance, the best recourse to avoid furhter disagreement would be to seperate these people, derp.
Probably a really big boat, sometime from August to October.i believe that's what jesus taught and thus you are right because jesus said white separtism is not racist so you're not racist and you're right.
let's send the blacks back to africa, spandy. how do you propose we do this so that things work best?
"they have no problem with our litteraly pumping poisons into their bloodstreams from the moment of inception" Not literally at all. Show me where "pro-lifers" support polluting the environment ......"deformations and eventual horrors as a result of these chemicals." I notice you don't produce any of these photos..............." there are only two explainations for this situation" The only explanations? I think not..............."this revelation shows quite clearly that pro life folk haen't a care for the preborn" Mmmm, no, it doesn't. Still trying to tell us what other people think? Your pretense at knowing the motives of others demonstrates a great arrogance in you. Should I state that "pro-choicers" hate babies and want the human race to die out?last count, there are over 283 various chemicals found in the umbilical blood of newborns. some are teratogentic, some are carcentogenic, some are neurotoxins, some are endocrine disruptors, or substitte hormones. they were found in every example, not just the poor, not just the stupid. Rich and poor alike have a vast assortment of biologicaly active and likely deleterious chemicals in their children's bloodstreams. They have been there since the onset of pregnancy. now here is my issue. the anti-aboriton crowd is completely self righteous and near insurection over the killing of the innocent by moms and clnix and doctors but not one peep, not one utterance, nexot one indication of outrage over our gross poisoning of the unborn. where are the anti-abortion folks over this massive harm done to the unborn/ they claim to be so compassionate, so caring, so justified - to the point of changing constitutions, changing established court decisions in favor of the million or so dead fetuses - shame on us! we are killers! we are violating the little one's rights to life, they say. yet, they have no problem with our litteraly pumping poisons into their bloodstreams from the moment of inception and there is no outrage over the millions of fetuses that are being systematicaly killed or maimed by these compounds. i beleive that this is more than ample evidence that pro lifers have an entirely different agenda than protecting the "rights' of the unborn. If they were truely concenred they would be taking up arms against the source of these poisons and the speading of them to each and every unborn, who according to them have a right to life just as we born do. they show pictures of mutilated babies, preying on emotion but show nothing of deformations and eventual horrors as a result of these chemicals. there are only two explainations for this situation. The pro lifers have no idea and are unwilling to examine, or they are actually more interested in contol over mothers and women than they are ver the health and safety of children. this revelation shows quite clearly that pro life folk haen't a care for the preborn they profess to want to protect, as of course they have no say, no power, no in herent protection afforded other 'citizens'. Pro lifers are disingenuous at the least, evil at the most.
Your only point is the one under your hat.Not a single comment on my point - telling actually.
It's not about "someone wants someone else to be in charge of their own body" and you know it. It's about sluts CHOOSING to use their bodies for recreation or profit, then murdering the unborn because they're inconvenient and can not defend themselves. We dehumanized the Jews, the Blacks, the Aborigines, and anyone else who gets in the way and slaughter them off.Yes. For shame someone wants someone else to be in charge of their own body. You must be for pot prohibition too.
Your claim that pro-lifers are also in favor of polluting the environment is not only unsupported, but a lie.My point is simple. (my errors are from my phone primarily, and as you know I do not spell well). If the "pro-life" faction were actually pro life, they would be concerned over the poisons in the environment that tend highly to endanger the life and health of that very "child" they seek to "save". If they were truely pro life they would at least show some outrage over the poisons that the mother is forced to ingest and thus pass on to her fetus - that thing they profess to be so concerned over. I said nothing about other "innocent things". You think that a total of 238 foreign chemicals in a human fetus is just enviro-wacko nonsense do you? They have found benzene in fetal blood of over 1 part per million, DDD, DDT (in children in the upper and lower latitudes), and hundreds of other chemicals. What would a pro-lifer say to a mother who drinks excessively? Smokes tobacco? smokes crack? but not a word about all these other things. If they were as concerned as they claim, they would be fighting to preserve the life and future of the unborn, yet they are not. Why?