your willful ignorance is astounding, but not unexpected. it takes a great effort to remain as dumb as you are.If Fox News was proven any more inaccurate than any other TV news, it would be plastered all over the internet, conservatives would never hear the end of here on RIU. But that's not the case, and we all know it.
No you proved me right.....He insinuated that Canada did not have Fox News because it was an unreliable news source, he was proven wrong.
lol it isIf Fox News was proven any more inaccurate than any other TV news, it would be plastered all over the internet, conservatives would never hear the end of here on RIU. But that's not the case, and we all know it.
The CRTC regulations apply only to Canadian broadcasters using Canadian airwaves; they do not apply to the Fox News Channel, which is a non-Canadian entity transmitted via satellite and cable, not broadcast over public airwaves.He insinuated that Canada did not have Fox News because it was an unreliable news source, he was proven wrong.
agreed...anything obama says is a lie despite the channel I selected to view it.what does the number of people who watch it have to do with the veracity and accuracy of it?
if 2 people watch a lie or 20 million watch a lie, it is still a lie.
try to improve your critical thinking skills, you lowly caveman.
Then you have the same credibility as your buddy UB, zip.No you proved me right.....
Tell me this ain't the first president you've ever seen.....agreed...anything obama says is a lie despite the channel I selected to view it.
O'Reilly in particular loves to boast about the ratings, I just wonder when it inevitably happens that FOX news gets beat in the ratings (that is - when 2/3's of his audience dies off in the next 10 years), will he still stand and support that logic?what does the number of people who watch it have to do with the veracity and accuracy of it?
if 2 people watch a lie or 20 million watch a lie, it is still a lie.
try to improve your critical thinking skills, you lowly caveman.
You posted this bro..... after fox agreed NOT to open a Canadian faux news channel, only then were they allowed to broadcast American generated faux news in Canada. They don't want their kind of news in Canada.....Bro, where do you get your news? LMFAO
In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns that Fox News U.S. and the Global Television Network were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox News U.S. executive said there were no plans to create a combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[SUP][94][/SUP]
Fox News Channel is currently[SUP][when?][/SUP] offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers Cable
How about that fox the only major "News" services that cannot get a license to broadcast in Canada, why?.....could it be they have credibility issues?
Most of the country & the world view 'fox news' for what it is, the propaganda arm of a political party.
Bro, where do you get your news? LMFAO
In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns that Fox News U.S. and the Global Television Network were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox News U.S. executive said there were no plans to create a combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[SUP][94][/SUP]
Fox News Channel is currently[SUP][when?][/SUP] offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers Cable
I already posted the same info, doublejj ignored it because it shut down his insinuation.lol it is
The CRTC regulations apply only to Canadian broadcasters using Canadian airwaves; they do not apply to the Fox News Channel, which is a non-Canadian entity transmitted via satellite and cable, not broadcast over public airwaves.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp
What did you think of the video on post #111?
I agree. Every media outlet has an agenda to push and from a non biased perspective, it's very easy to identify. People stuck in the left/right paradigm simply don't seem to have this ability. It's all about their team being right and the other team being wrong. This is the exact reason younger generations of people are moving away from TV news sources onto more independent ones online, they have more to gain by telling the viewer the truth and a lot more to lose lying as establishing credibility creates supporters and if you lie to the viewer, even just once, all that you've worked for is immediately destroyed. The old adage "it takes a lifetime to create trust and only a moment to destroy it" explains it perfectly.All the major media outlets put out biased reporting and opinion pieces as news. You have to be half nuts to watch that stuff everyday.
So the Canadian standards that require "News" organizations to broadcast the truth does not apply to FOX news, so they are allowed to broadcast in Canada. Explain to me how he was proved wrong?I already posted the same info, doublejj ignored it because it shut down his insinuation.
And yes I watched the Young Turks video, same old propaganda they usually produce.
And here's the truth that puts your misinformed ass to bed.You posted this bro..... after fox agreed NOT to open a Canadian faux news channel, only then were they allowed to broadcast American generated faux news in Canada. They don't want their kind of news in Canada.....
| FALSE |
The whole wiki article pretty much says what color of crime says, but there is a sentence or short paragraph where it says something like poverty is a better fit that race, but the biggest indicator of the wealth of a neighborhood is also race.no.
colorofcrime and wiki do not say the same thing. can you even read?
Only Canadian owned media is, but that does not mean Canadian news is any more reliable than Fox.Why isn't FOX held to the CRTC standard for news organizations Canadian produced news organizations are?
I'm a fan of Duck Dynasty.. and?O'Reilly in particular loves to boast about the ratings, I just wonder when it inevitably happens that FOX news gets beat in the ratings (that is - when 2/3's of his audience dies off in the next 10 years), will he still stand and support that logic?
And also, he must be a biiiiiig fan of Honey-Boo-Boo, Keeping up with the Kardashians and Duck Dynasty, just look at their ratings!
Not sure what happen with you pada but you slipped off the ball on this one..So the Canadian standards that require "News" organizations to broadcast the truth does not apply to FOX news, so they are allowed to broadcast in Canada. Explain to me how he was proved wrong?
Do you believe if they were also held to that standard they'd be allowed to produce and broadcast FOX in Canada?
Obama metaphorically bitch slapped O'Reilly and made him look like a fool, that was beautiful!
Benghazi, the IRS "scandal"? LMFAO I was waiting for him to bring up the birth certificate next!
If person A can lie and person B can't, who would you say would be a more reliable person in regards to credible information?Only Canadian owned media is, but that does not mean Canadian news is any more reliable than Fox.