It's All The Fault Of Fox News

beenthere

New Member
If Fox News was proven any more inaccurate than any other TV news, it would be plastered all over the internet, conservatives would never hear the end of here on RIU. But that's not the case, and we all know it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If Fox News was proven any more inaccurate than any other TV news, it would be plastered all over the internet, conservatives would never hear the end of here on RIU. But that's not the case, and we all know it.
your willful ignorance is astounding, but not unexpected. it takes a great effort to remain as dumb as you are.


http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
If Fox News was proven any more inaccurate than any other TV news, it would be plastered all over the internet, conservatives would never hear the end of here on RIU. But that's not the case, and we all know it.
lol it is

He insinuated that Canada did not have Fox News because it was an unreliable news source, he was proven wrong.
The CRTC regulations apply only to Canadian broadcasters using Canadian airwaves; they do not apply to the Fox News Channel, which is a non-Canadian entity transmitted via satellite and cable, not broadcast over public airwaves.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp


What did you think of the video on post #111?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
what does the number of people who watch it have to do with the veracity and accuracy of it?

if 2 people watch a lie or 20 million watch a lie, it is still a lie.

try to improve your critical thinking skills, you lowly caveman.
agreed...anything obama says is a lie despite the channel I selected to view it.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
what does the number of people who watch it have to do with the veracity and accuracy of it?

if 2 people watch a lie or 20 million watch a lie, it is still a lie.

try to improve your critical thinking skills, you lowly caveman.
O'Reilly in particular loves to boast about the ratings, I just wonder when it inevitably happens that FOX news gets beat in the ratings (that is - when 2/3's of his audience dies off in the next 10 years), will he still stand and support that logic?

And also, he must be a biiiiiig fan of Honey-Boo-Boo, Keeping up with the Kardashians and Duck Dynasty, just look at their ratings!
 

Rak on Tur'

Active Member
All the major media outlets put out biased reporting and opinion pieces as news. You have to be half nuts to watch that stuff everyday.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Bro, where do you get your news? LMFAO

In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns that Fox News U.S. and the Global Television Network were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox News U.S. executive said there were no plans to create a combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[SUP][94][/SUP]
Fox News Channel is currently[SUP][when?][/SUP] offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers Cable
You posted this bro..... after fox agreed NOT to open a Canadian faux news channel, only then were they allowed to broadcast American generated faux news in Canada. They don't want their kind of news in Canada.....
 

beenthere

New Member
How about that fox the only major "News" services that cannot get a license to broadcast in Canada, why?.....could it be they have credibility issues?
Most of the country & the world view 'fox news' for what it is, the propaganda arm of a political party.
Bro, where do you get your news? LMFAO

In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns that Fox News U.S. and the Global Television Network were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox News U.S. executive said there were no plans to create a combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[SUP][94][/SUP]
Fox News Channel is currently[SUP][when?][/SUP] offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers Cable
lol it is



The CRTC regulations apply only to Canadian broadcasters using Canadian airwaves; they do not apply to the Fox News Channel, which is a non-Canadian entity transmitted via satellite and cable, not broadcast over public airwaves.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp


What did you think of the video on post #111?
I already posted the same info, doublejj ignored it because it shut down his insinuation.
And yes I watched the Young Turks video, same old propaganda they usually produce.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
All the major media outlets put out biased reporting and opinion pieces as news. You have to be half nuts to watch that stuff everyday.
I agree. Every media outlet has an agenda to push and from a non biased perspective, it's very easy to identify. People stuck in the left/right paradigm simply don't seem to have this ability. It's all about their team being right and the other team being wrong. This is the exact reason younger generations of people are moving away from TV news sources onto more independent ones online, they have more to gain by telling the viewer the truth and a lot more to lose lying as establishing credibility creates supporters and if you lie to the viewer, even just once, all that you've worked for is immediately destroyed. The old adage "it takes a lifetime to create trust and only a moment to destroy it" explains it perfectly.

The Young Turks on youtube has a pretty clear left leaning slant, but for the most part the information you get from that organization is relatively honest. They criticize politicians on the left as well as the right, as well as Obama when he does stupid shit
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I already posted the same info, doublejj ignored it because it shut down his insinuation.
And yes I watched the Young Turks video, same old propaganda they usually produce.
So the Canadian standards that require "News" organizations to broadcast the truth does not apply to FOX news, so they are allowed to broadcast in Canada. Explain to me how he was proved wrong?

Do you believe if they were also held to that standard they'd be allowed to produce and broadcast FOX in Canada?


Obama metaphorically bitch slapped O'Reilly and made him look like a fool, that was beautiful!

Benghazi, the IRS "scandal"? LMFAO I was waiting for him to bring up the birth certificate next!
 

beenthere

New Member
You posted this bro..... after fox agreed NOT to open a Canadian faux news channel, only then were they allowed to broadcast American generated faux news in Canada. They don't want their kind of news in Canada.....
And here's the truth that puts your misinformed ass to bed.

Snopes .com

Canadian Fox
Claim: The Fox News television channel has been banned in Canada.

FALSE

Canadian Fox

Claim: The Fox News television channel has been banned in Canada.

FALSE


Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp#zgI27qZzSe19ZcAK.99



Origins:Since at least 2011, rumors have circulated claiming the Fox News television channel has been banned in Canada due to its running afoul of Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) prohibitions which make it "illegal to broadcast lies and label it news."

Fox Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch was rebuffed in his efforts to establish Fox News Canada in 2003 due to Canadian laws regarding foreign ownership of print and broadcast media, but the CRTC approved an application to bring the Fox News Channel to Canadian digital television line-ups back in November 2004, and that channel is now carried by dozens of different digital providers throughout Canada.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
no.

colorofcrime and wiki do not say the same thing. can you even read?
The whole wiki article pretty much says what color of crime says, but there is a sentence or short paragraph where it says something like poverty is a better fit that race, but the biggest indicator of the wealth of a neighborhood is also race.

Linking crime to SES instead of race sounds cool for a minute until you realize that the best indicator of SES is also race.

Poor whites also commit more crime than middle class whites being the only saving grace of your counterpoint.
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
O'Reilly in particular loves to boast about the ratings, I just wonder when it inevitably happens that FOX news gets beat in the ratings (that is - when 2/3's of his audience dies off in the next 10 years), will he still stand and support that logic?

And also, he must be a biiiiiig fan of Honey-Boo-Boo, Keeping up with the Kardashians and Duck Dynasty, just look at their ratings!
I'm a fan of Duck Dynasty.. and?

So the Canadian standards that require "News" organizations to broadcast the truth does not apply to FOX news, so they are allowed to broadcast in Canada. Explain to me how he was proved wrong?

Do you believe if they were also held to that standard they'd be allowed to produce and broadcast FOX in Canada?


Obama metaphorically bitch slapped O'Reilly and made him look like a fool, that was beautiful!

Benghazi, the IRS "scandal"? LMFAO I was waiting for him to bring up the birth certificate next!
Not sure what happen with you pada but you slipped off the ball on this one..

Broadcasting is the distribution of audio and video content to a dispersed audience via any audio or visual mass communications medium, but usually one using electromagnetic radiation (radio waves).

Even though they don't have a physical location, fox news is still (broadcasted) over cable. << This as whole proves the statement wrong that they are not allowed to broadcast in canada.

Not sure why you needed the young turks to walk you through the obama interview, but you saying that O'reilly was metaphorically bitch slapped by obama is completely wrong. Unless you count avoiding questions he always avoids as him bitch slapping someone then ok.

The last part you wrote about him bringing up "things of the past", is a major talking point around the beginning of that video, but even still its relevant because he always dodges the questions and while some may think that Benghazi is done and ppl should leave it alone are obviously not thinking of the families that still want answers that they will never get.
 
Top