UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it seems that way. he complains constantly that a black person took his spot at ITT tech, had to settle for devryU.
Name the Place You Can Pay NO Taxes And Receive A Refund..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
I see what you did there.
I'm having tons of fun today. This forum makes me laugh and smile--it fills me with glee. My real word opponents are much, much harder to beat because I can't say anything I want. This is playing with Monopoly money.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Fake money for a fake piece of shit. Makes sense.
So you're saying I'm not a piece of shit. Thanks.
there would be no way he would know who took his spot..
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Oh, snap...Did I type that out loud?So you're saying I'm not a piece of shit. Thanks.
paying taxes in the us is free choice and if you don't want to, live in another country..holding on to money that should be the governments is robbing the people of america..then they go and pay non-livable wages and direct employees to social programs that the people of america must pay for..
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he said they told him the precise race and precise SES of the person they took.
then when i called him out on his obvious bullshit, his story changed and he had to admit he just ASSUMED a black kid took his spot.
poor little southern belle, that kid.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think he is saying your are a piece of shit, and you are fake.So you're saying I'm not a piece of shit. Thanks.
I never claimed anyone told me any of that. Stop lying.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
here you tell me that you knew the SES and race of the person you were rejected in favor of.
gonna go searching for more.
That's based on my own statistical analysis of admissions data, not on any claim that I was informed of such details by anyone else. When you say I said someone told me anything you're lying.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's based on your racist assumptions, actually. you have no idea who they decided was a better candidate than you. they probably just thought you were a smug cocksucker and shitcanned your application.
How could "statistical analysis" tell you what happened in your particular situation? Explain what admissions data you used to learn, for a fact, that a person was given your spot based on their skin color.
My stats versus their stats with the difference in outcomes based on race. A black person with my stats was overwhelmingly likely to be admitted almost everywhere (the chance was something like 80% versus closer to a 30% chance for a "white" person). Approximately 40% of the slots for my program went to "non-white" people. The "white" population is closer to 75% (Hispanics/Latinos are mostly considered "white" and don't get the same consideration benefit as someone who is "non-white"). The stats of most "non-white" admits were inferior to the stats of most "white" admits. The disparities in admits, credentials, and population proportions suggest that "non-white" people were artificially over-admitted over "white" applicants. Given that I applied to approximately 20 programs, I am certain that I was passed over for a "non-white" applicant with the same stats from a similar socio-economic background at least once and probably more than that (I got into five programs).
As I said then, if affirmative action is going to exist it should not be based on race but socio-economic status. I came from low socio-economic status but the process was blind to that; the process is likewise blind to "non-white" people from high socio-economic status. They got the race-based benefit regardless of socio-economic status. If you think those applicants overwhelmingly come from low socio-economic status, suggesting it doesn't make much of a difference, the data on median family incomes for undergraduate admissions implies otherwise.
I'm sure Buck is going to call all of this racist, but it has nothing to do with racial animosity. I am not whining that "non-white people" "stole" spots "deserved" by "white" people. All I am suggesting is that SES is a better metric in graduate admissions than race, if the goal is to promote people who didn't have access to the same opportunities as people from high SES.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
There was no fictional accounting....I went over it child style for you in the other thread....every statement was fully sourced.
You did not even know US Notes were in existence and that the issuing authority for them and our coins are Treasury.
Here it is again....https://www.rollitup.org/politics/652366-impossible-deficit-falling-well-unemployment.html
Since you admit you are playing with Monopoly Money by being on this site, you might want to rethink the credibility of your statements.
I have no tax protester "friends" and I stand on my own as an individual. It just burns your ass that a butcher knows more than you on the subject so proceed with the butt hurt, it does not phase me in the least....
tokeprep said:
When you go and try and explain "positive law" to me, when it was I that explained it to you in our first encounter it furthers to discredit you as an individual.....many here DID follow along on that one weather you realize it or not.
Fixed that for ya........Enjoy!
because he's a dick..now wormie, imagine if tokeprep were a peen..what would he look like?. please post.
bombur don't waste your time he's full of shit.
