"global warming petition project" peer reviewed and everything???

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You against the world That's exactly why none of them will touch the substance of what's being said or argue the points made. They can't tell me what they would accept as proof, can't provide any evidence of any of their claims without citing an obvious political/religious bias or conflict of interest, can't even identify when a source actually is or isn't biased, believe in a world wide conspiracy in which all the leading climate scientists are falsifying data to raise Americans taxes and one of them just revealed he doesn't even believe the climate is actually changing! Exactly why we should leave this sort of shit up to the professionals. They think they can read a few websites and have a solid grasp on the idea when it takes years of research after years of critical thinking (which neither of them have). Is that what I said? No? Then no
Click to expand...
Now you're reduced to falsifying quotes. Sad little boy throwing a tantrum. Funny how your religious leaders gave up on "Global Warming" when it turned out to be a lie and now call it "Climate Change". So how many years do you claim to have spent researching Global Wa...excuse me. Climate Change? Or did you just read a few web sites? You get more amusing with every post.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You against the world That's exactly why none of them will touch the substance of what's being said or argue the points made. They can't tell me what they would accept as proof, can't provide any evidence of any of their claims without citing an obvious political/religious bias or conflict of interest, can't even identify when a source actually is or isn't biased, believe in a world wide conspiracy in which all the leading climate scientists are falsifying data to raise Americans taxes and one of them just revealed he doesn't even believe the climate is actually changing! Exactly why we should leave this sort of shit up to the professionals. They think they can read a few websites and have a solid grasp on the idea when it takes years of research after years of critical thinking (which neither of them have). Is that what I said? No? Then no
Click to expand...
Yes, that is what you said, and keep saying
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
red can't keep his family from burning alive in a fire, but he no doubt knows better than peer-reviewed climatologists.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You against the world That's exactly why none of them will touch the substance of what's being said or argue the points made. They can't tell me what they would accept as proof, can't provide any evidence of any of their claims without citing an obvious political/religious bias or conflict of interest, can't even identify when a source actually is or isn't biased, believe in a world wide conspiracy in which all the leading climate scientists are falsifying data to raise Americans taxes and one of them just revealed he doesn't even believe the climate is actually changing! Exactly why we should leave this sort of shit up to the professionals. They think they can read a few websites and have a solid grasp on the idea when it takes years of research after years of critical thinking (which neither of them have). Is that what I said? No? Then no
Click to expand...
And it wasn't 97% percent of "the worlds leading climate experts". It was 97% of those who wrote an article. Scientist, bus boy, student, hooker on the street, or anyone who can write, who was so upset they wrote a article about it. Not "leading", not "climate", not "expert". Considering that only "the sky is falling chicken littles" would bother to write about it, anything less than 100% is an indictment. We didn't make any claims, you did. Now you want to blame us because you can't prove your claim. Whiny little girl.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
And it wasn't 97% percent of "the worlds leading climate experts". It was 97% of those who wrote an article. Scientist, bus boy, student, hooker on the street, or anyone who can write, who was so upset they wrote a article about it. Not "leading", not "climate", not "expert". Considering that only "the sky is falling chicken littles" would bother to write about it, anything less than 100% is an indictment. We didn't make any claims, you did. Now you want to blame us because you can't prove your claim. Whiny little girl.
Click to expand...
awwww, look at the whiny little girl who is too scared to cite any scientists and who can't even tell the truth about who is writing what.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Now you're reduced to falsifying quotes. Sad little boy throwing a tantrum. Funny how your religious leaders gave up on "Global Warming" when it turned out to be a lie and now call it "Climate Change". So how many years do you claim to have spent researching Global Wa...excuse me. Climate Change? Or did you just read a few web sites? You get more amusing with every post.
Click to expand...
It was changed to "climate change" for two main reasons, 1. it's a more descriptive scientific term, and 2. so retards like yourself stop writing to the government when the weather is different than you might expect that day

The proof that's available has convinced 97% of the experts who study the climate. What would it take to convince you?

Do you understand why if you can't answer that simple question you don't understand what you're saying?

Watch how easy it is.. "What would convince you gravity doesn't exist?" ..."well, that's easy, if object started floating I'd probably start questioning gravity...". "What would convince you climate change isn't happening?" ..."if the climate remained constant during all of our measurements"... The fact that the global temperature fluctuates is proof that climate change happens. Proof smacked you in the face, did you feel it? That's what proof feels like. Like I told you before, the manufactured debate that JB talks about that isn't really a debate at all is about why it's changing. Scientifically illiterate people with political and religious biases on one side and educated professionals who make a living researching the climate. Hmm... tough one..
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
joe macclennan said:
damn buck, did that really happen? I know you don't like him but that's a messed up statement imo
Click to expand...
yep, super true.

i used to call him 46 years old and he would say it wasn't true, only to find out recently that back in 1982 he came home from work to find his family incinerated, likely by careless smoking and no fire alarms in the house.

i call that borderline negligent manslaughter not to have fire alarms in a house with small children, especially with careless smokers in the house.
 
J

joe macclennan

Well-Known Member
regardless of how offensive he has been. I cannot poke fun at a man losing his family like that.

I've had a fire before, noone was hurt but it was devastating nonetheless.

I can only imagine...........

edit: my heart goes out to you for this tragedy red :(
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
joe macclennan said:
damn buck, did that really happen? I know you don't like him but that's a messed up statement imo
Click to expand...
He makes the most vile accusations whenever he's proven to be lying or just a fool. Wait awhile and he'll tell you I raped, murdered, and burned alive my entire family. Oh, he says I'm a racist, too. Then he'll tell you about how morally superior he his. In truth, he's just a bitter old man dependent on his wife for support while he spends his entire day on RIU trying to prove his manhood.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
...so what'd he say?
Click to expand...
oh, the usual.

Carne Seca said:
His calling me a gold digger stems from my being denied benefits and rights as a domestic partner. When he was murdered I lost our home because it was in his name. I wasn't allowed to pick up his effects or even plan his funeral. I had no rights. So this is where Red dick gets his twisted fodder from. Pretty sad and pathetic.
Click to expand...
Red1966 said:
Poor Carne, are you still butthurt your sugardaddy didn't give a fuck about you? You keep on living in your fantasy world, the fact remains your sugardaddy left you nothing. At the time of his death, all you were concerned about was what you didn't get. You railed about his family not letting you see him in the hospital, but you didn't claim shit about any hate crime, other than you didn't get to profit from his death. That was your only concern. I can see why he purposely excluded you. Quit trying to play the martyr, gold digger. Claiming I'm a homophobe because I dislike gold digging whores like you demonstrates just what a low-life you are.
Click to expand...
Red1966 said:
It was your "boyfriend" who denied you. It wasn't your home, it was his. There's a reason you weren't on the deed. He didn't want your money grubbing hands on his property. Domestic partner wasn't your title when he was alive, you were just a sex partner. He could have left you whatever he wanted to, and it looks like that's exactly what he did. He made his feelings about you perfectly clear. Trying to claim otherwise is just you being a gold digger. So get off your high horse, gold digger, and quit your whining, Neither I, his family, nor society determined what you got of his possessions. Your "boyfriend" left you exactly what he wanted you to have of his... nothing.
Click to expand...
Red1966 said:
Why pity me? You're the one whining your "boyfriend" cut you out. I think it's funny, you claiming you are "owed" something, when your "boyfriend" clearly thought you weren't. He gave you exactly what he wanted you to have...nothing. Get over it.
Click to expand...
 
J

joe macclennan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i agree, he earned his bad karma after some very choice words about carne seca's murdered partner. not sure if you remember carne, he was well liked.
Click to expand...
as a matter of fact My post was the last post he liked before he left. not that you can tell now since the likes are gone.

either way I will not make fun of a person..any person for losing loved ones like that.

that's messed up. I don't care what he said about carne or anyone else for that matter.

I have lost many friends and family to untimely deaths. Two of my best friends died within a year of each other in my early twenties. both in accidents.

I cannot gloat over anothers loss like that. Now that's not to say that i can't be pretty cold hearted towards the deaths of those I don't like. But I will not carry my dislike of an individual over to his family. Unless his family were a bunch of assholes too.

but do what you do buck. I still love ya buddy
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
It was changed to "climate change" for two main reasons, 1. it's a more descriptive scientific term, and 2. so retards like yourself stop writing to the government when the weather is different than you might expect that day The proof that's available has convinced 97% of the experts who study the climate. What would it take to convince you? Do you understand why if you can't answer that simple question you don't understand what you're saying? Watch how easy it is.. "What would convince you gravity doesn't exist?" ..."well, that's easy, if object started floating I'd probably start questioning gravity...". "What would convince you climate change isn't happening?" ..."if the climate remained constant during all of our measurements"... The fact that the global temperature fluctuates is proof that climate change happens. Proof smacked you in the face, did you feel it? That's what proof feels like. Like I told you before, the manufactured debate that JB talks about that isn't really a debate at all is about why it's changing. Scientifically illiterate people with political and religious biases on one side and educated professionals who make a living researching the climate. Hmm... tough one..
Click to expand...
"It was changed to "climate change" for two main reasons," Well, one, actually. The temp has been for falling the last ten years. Keep claiming that " 97% of the experts who study the climate." who turned out to be only 97% of articles written about it from a group the guy who made the "study" refuses to identify. Pretending the normal day to day change in weather somehow proves the end of the world is coming is asinine. So, have you given up using your car, heater, air conditioner, TV, radio, etc. yet?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top