Loopy!Lets smash particles into each other and find out...
That's an awful big leap of faith, saying it was created from nothing.Here's a question that I think might fit here. Either way.
If our universe was created from nothing, why would the universe be the only thing that was created?
We;re not certain of anything outside the observable universe.....How could nothing differentiate the potential for everything? How certain are we that nothing still exists outside of the universe as the cause of that which is within it. And, most importantly, did nothing go somewhere else for a beer after?
That's an awful big leap of faith, saying it was created from nothing.
We;re not certain of anything outside the observable universe.....
Before the Big Bang, the universe was in a different state; an extremely hot, dense and tiny state. It wasn't outside or within, it was the universe before the expansion...What existed pre cause and expansion? Would 'it' be outside of the observable universe, or, still within it as a continual cause?
I knew it! Too hot, expand, have beerBefore the Big Bang, the universe was in a different state; an extremely hot, dense and tiny state. It wasn't outside or within, it was the universe before the expansion...
Before the Big Bang, the universe was in a different state; an extremely hot, dense and tiny state. It wasn't outside or within, it was the universe before the expansion...
Seriously, though, what did it unfold into? If it is unfolding into (or out of) itself there never would have been a singularity to point to. It always would have been, and always will be. Dude, sounds awfully familiar.I knew it! Too hot, expand, have beer
But, how long did the singularity last for?Before the Big Bang, the universe was in a different state; an extremely hot, dense and tiny state. It wasn't outside or within, it was the universe before the expansion...
That question may not make any sense. Before the big bang, there was no time or space, as spacetime was created after the expansion. Hard to wrap my mind around that. We have no idea what occurred before the expansion, it's gonna be fun to find out. Holding a cold, frosty beer, of courseSeriously, though, what did it unfold into? If it is unfolding into (or out of) itself there never would have been a singularity to point to. It always would have been, and always will be. Dude, sounds awfully familiar.
We have no idea. The question itself may make no sense, since there was no time before the expansion...But, how long did the singularity last for?
Currently, we have no idea...The singularity could have just showed up and then started expanding into the universe or what?
Again, we don't know. Since energy is neither created or destroyed, perhaps it had always existed...Where did the singularity come from anyways? Where did all that energy come from to start a full universe?
Yes, that may be a comforting thought, but it is a conversation stopper. If we take the answer of a god, then that stifles the need to find the true answer. Also, instead of answering the problem, a deity simply confounds the problem. For then we a stuck with the infinite regression of what created god, and what created that, so on into infinity. If one answers that god has always existed, we may as well skip the god part and just accept that the universe has always existed (in some form)...I believe the singularity was created by a God, there is no scientific explanation to create a singularity, aka the very beginning of a created universe.
CheersThat question may not make any sense. Before the big bang, there was no time or space, as spacetime was created after the expansion. Hard to wrap my mind around that. We have no idea what occurred before the expansion, it's gonna be fun to find out. Holding a cold, frosty beer, of course
Take the problem of free will for example, that a god (whatever god you want, make one up if you want) created the universe with the Big Bang, and everything in that universe is like clockwork, no choice, just the illusion of choice. No self, just the illusion of self.Because an illusion doesn't have substance, or it's not an illusion, it's real. The fact that I'm using my mind to respond to you, means it can't be illusory. Your responses to me, could possibly be an illusion, but not my internal monologue and thought processes.
So, you're an idiot?There is no certainty unless you're an idiot.
clever, but no, i simply said that to convey a message, not to establish some absolute truthSo, you're an idiot?
lol, I know, no worries man.clever, but no, i simply said that to convey a message, not to establish some absolute truth