Why is it that...

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Blacks do randomly attack whites, knock out game.

You do realize your argument can be stated as "black people are so violent, although they are the number one cause of violence against white people, that makes up a very small percentage of the total violence they commit."

Great argument. Red herring!
Click to expand...
whites target blacks in the knockout game too.

as far as the rest of your tripe, i will state yet again: violence correlates most with socioeconomic status regardless of race, not race.

a lot of blacks tend to be poorer due in part to the institutional racism of racist assholes like you, among many other factors.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
charface said:
Were you just really bored???
Not my businesses but really wondering how a non gay did all that.
Click to expand...
he was 14 years old.

he had his friend over for sleepovers. his friend, mind you, had been diddled by an uncle of his.

anyhoo, the story is that it started like this: bignbushy's friend would ask him if it was OK if he masturbated, but he was already masturbating.

eventually, using the moves taught to him by the diddling uncle, bignbushy's friend gradually coerced/convinced him into doing all the sexual things that the uncle had done to him. first with blowjobs, then anal sex, and facials, and all the rest.

bignbushy maintains that despite the clear and obvious nature of the incident, he was not a victim of childhood sexual abuse.

100/100 mental health professionals would disagree.
 
killemsoftly

killemsoftly

Well-Known Member
i would like to hear bnb tell the whole story. damn he is one fine troll. We should have a troll contest on riu with an awards ceremony. the red carpet. it would be awesome
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Don't give me wiki for something controversial. There are thousands of unclebuck like folks out there who's life mission is spreading left propaganda. That involves demonizing the Koch brothers.

I, like you, wish they would stay out of it, but they aren't, and the law of the land says they can, so as far as what these guys are really all about is concerned, they are a force for good, rather than bad.

Guys like you stand up and protest cancer research for children because Koch paid for it, why do you want to be lumped in with that?
Click to expand...
Again, you are misinformed

Read the wikipedia link I posted, read about their funding history

They actively fund disinformation campaigns against climate change and health care

"Koch Industries and its subsidiaries spent more than $20 million on lobbying in 2008 and $12.3 million in 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group. In an article about the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study (Chair Richard A. Muller), Los Angeles Times reporter Margot Roosevelt called the Koch Brothers "the nation's most prominent funders of efforts to prevent curbs on fossil-fuel burning"."

People like this are actively responsible for buying American democracy, and you are effectively siding with them instead of 90% of Americans on one of the only legitimately bipartisan issues in the country
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Again, you are misinformed

Read the wikipedia link I posted, read about their funding history

They actively fund disinformation campaigns against climate change and health care

"Koch Industries and its subsidiaries spent more than $20 million on lobbying in 2008 and $12.3 million in 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group. In an article about the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study (Chair Richard A. Muller), Los Angeles Times reporter Margot Roosevelt called the Koch Brothers "the nation's most prominent funders of efforts to prevent curbs on fossil-fuel burning"."

People like this are actively responsible for buying American democracy, and you are effectively siding with them instead of 90% of Americans on one of the only legitimately bipartisan issues in the country
Click to expand...
So you're condemning people based on their views on weather?

Why do you side with folks who hate children's cancer research?
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
They buy American democracy.

Why do you continue to ignore that point?
Click to expand...
I don't ignore it. But they aren't the only ones.

I don't know that I'd go so far as to say them, or anyone, "buy democracy."

Do you have any evidence of them purchasing votes? Buying off election officials to rig the vote counts?

No?

They spend money to influence the populace, and to influence the elected officials. They make up a tiny fraction of the cumulative amount of dollars spent doing the same. The left has it's own Koch like people.

What about George Soros? That fucker isn't even an American. At least the Koch guys are Americans.

As I've said, I'm not an expert on these guys, but so far I've not read anything that is unbiased about them that says they are bad people. Their employees seem to be treated pretty well. Their political beliefs seem to be fairly inline with mine, socially liberal, fiscally conservative.

They are pro pot legalization, pro gay marriage, I'd say they probably don't want creation taught in classrooms.

The federal government has become so large that it can and does radically influence big business, so big business influences them. If we had a smaller government, with less power, the need to influence it would decrease proportionally.

You act as if we had this perfect, unbiased, for the people, great government, and then in came the Koch guys and totally ripped it off.

Your hatred of them is irrational.
 
Eye of Horus

Eye of Horus

Well-Known Member
I think my hatred is spurred by the fact that the wealth is as disproportionate as during the great depression. It may not hit us today, maybe not tomorrow, but it will hit us and it will hurt pretty damn bad.

Trickle dick economics was a crafty way to bring the power back to the top and to keep it there. They may not go out and buy votes but both parties brainwash people with all this propaganda and false promises along with the senate throwing in all these little extra balls and chains to every bill they pass.
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Eye of Horus said:
I think my hatred is spurred by the fact that the wealth is as disproportionate as during the great depression. It may not hit us today, maybe not tomorrow, but it will hit us and it will hurt pretty damn bad.

Trickle dick economics was a crafty way to bring the power back to the top and to keep it there. They may not go out and buy votes but both parties brainwash people with all this propaganda and false promises along with the senate throwing in all these little extra balls and chains to every bill they pass.
Click to expand...
I agree that a correction is likely to occur soon.

But with respect to trickle down, I think it works in the system that was in place (but no longer) when Reagan made it famous.

In the early 80 ' s we still made stuff here. Now we don't. So the wealth, as anyone can see, is going to places like China instead of the American people.

Free trade with nations that manipulate their currency and practically use slave labor is the main reason we are where we are. Trickle down worked just fine when in a time when we made stuff in America.

Two things that would help...

Massive tariff on goods imported from slave labor countries.

Reinstatement of the 95% top marginal income tax rates for incomes over, say $100 million, regular earned income or otherwise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top