It's funny to me how MMPR's Tweed seems to always universally refer to plants as "strains". It's interesting that you've done the same here. Reeks of shill.
Security requirements, QA requirements, etc, haven't increased or changed since the MMPR rolled out. This sounds like BS and it sounds like an insider's cheap excuse. It's pretty common and expected for large projects to fail on an inspection or two, for whichever corners they cut. That doesn't mean that the requirements of the program have changed at any point in time, or caused your company any greater duress than they brought on themselves.
First, you can lay off the hate just a bit.
Secondly, I don't work for, support or want anything to do with Tweed or any other licensed producers.
Third, QA requirements have changed. They sent out a dedicated letter on the subject just a few weeks ago.
Fourth, MMAR product didn't have to be tested like MMPR product. I'm not saying you're wrong about it's quality, but it's very possible that issues went unnoticed. That said, it was obviously better product than Tweed has put out.
I'm not sure what your beef is with me, but 3 posts in a row just to hate on everything I said? Please.
There won't be any magical quality levels obtained just because they planted it from seed themselves, and Tweed's already demonstrated that for you
I don't believe the product Tweed shipped was 100% grown by them. I don't know for certain, but the timeline seems sketchy.
If MMPR regulated licensed producers stuck any mite or mold infested plants (irrespective of your universal application of "strain") in their grow room? That's allllllll on them.
Correct. That's the whole problem with buying up plants and not testing them when they come
in.
You can generally fill any prescription at any pharmacy, and without signing your soul over to them. There's also a "shoppers" in just about every city, and it's not mail order only, which is utter nonsense.
I believe they can also transfer a prescription from one pharmacy to another upon request. The notion of having to go back to your doctor for another is just insane and flat out prohibitive. Takes me about three months to see my doctor, and I'm pretty lucky to even have one.
Last time I got a prescription, even for a long-term issue, they made me go back to the doctor every 60 days to get a new prescription. It's my fault for trying to compare it to a prescription, but my intention was more on the side of pointing out that they're still treating this as a
controlled substance because that's what it is to them. They don't want to give you more free access or readily available product - from everything we've seen and heard HC would rather you don't have access to it at all.
LP's aren't the victims here, and there's no cause for sympathy. That's the program they signed up for. If they hadn't, there'd be no program. This benefits them, but not the patients.
I agree with this point as well. It
is what LPs signed up for.
(See how I did that thing where I quote you multiple times in one post instead of posting 3 times in a row? It's called
copy and paste.)