First, you can lay off the hate just a bit.
Secondly, I don't work for, support or want anything to do with Tweed or any other licensed producers.
Third, QA requirements have changed. They sent out a dedicated letter on the subject just a few weeks ago.
Fourth, MMAR product didn't have to be tested like MMPR product. I'm not saying you're wrong about it's quality, but it's very possible that issues went unnoticed. That said, it was obviously better product than Tweed has put out.
I'm not sure what your beef is with me, but 3 posts in a row just to hate on everything I said? Please.
I don't believe the product Tweed shipped was 100% grown by them. I don't know for certain, but the timeline seems sketchy.
Correct. That's the whole problem with buying up plants and not testing them when they come in.
Last time I got a prescription, even for a long-term issue, they made me go back to the doctor every 60 days to get a new prescription. It's my fault for trying to compare it to a prescription, but my intention was more on the side of pointing out that they're still treating this as a controlled substance because that's what it is to them. They don't want to give you more free access or readily available product - from everything we've seen and heard HC would rather you don't have access to it at all.
I agree with this point as well. It is what LPs signed up for.
(See how I did that thing where I quote you multiple times in one post instead of posting 3 times in a row? It's called copy and paste.)
I don't care what your "beliefs" are. But you seem to have a whole lot of "insider beliefs". Your every post is either detailing more of them, that we should totally be optimistic about, or making excuses for their every failure. You're a shill, either for Tweed alone or universal for the MMPR, perhaps both. I don't see anybody else around here with a day's old account posting links to Tweed's "merch", just you. Give it up. You might fool one or two people but the rest are more than likely on to you as well.
"Third, QA requirements have changed. They sent out a dedicated letter on the subject just a few weeks ago. "
How would a non shill know that? Of course I don't see you substantiating it with any evidence. What exactly is a "dedicated" letter. Do you mean "for office use only"? If they sent out the letter a few weeks ago, then it obviously couldn't have had any effect on their process for the first batches they've shipped, as you claimed it must have because they were approved a year ago, as if to say they just had to change everything several times over as restrictions and standards tightened up. Total nonsense, and everybody who's been paying attention knows that they pretty well set their own standards. It's utter nonsense. Where's the letter? What changed? Are you going to tell us they've amended electrical codes just for the MMPR? Somehow electrical code standards were insufficient for this special program? Somehow security systems technology wasn't up to snuff to fulfill the requirements of the MMPR as spelled out for it? Give me a break. You're simply not believable and your arguments are nonsense. Health Canada would have just given them another slide anyway. We don't need your assumptions and beliefs that if they just didn't have such a hard time, they could probably do a better job. Who cares? Nobody made them bite off more than they can chew, but I'm not sure the same can be said for you.
Oh but thanks for affirming what the whole problem of amateurs who haven't a clue what they're doing might be. The whole problem isn't that they brought plants in, and I notice that you didn't say "strains" this time. The problem is that they haven't a damn clue as to what they're doing. "Correct", and thank you for re-spinning it to better suit that particular narrative of yours, mr. not a shill.
"Last time I got a prescription, even for a long-term issue, they made me..."
Apples and oranges. False equivalencies don't make your point very well. The argument was making people go back to their doctor simply to change pharmacies. It doesn't work that way for "other pharmaceuticals". It's unique to the MMPR and it's nonsense. Declaring they are "treating it like any other pharmaceutical" is piss poor justification for the unjustifiable.
You ought to be more concerned with your own posting style, when you can't eve make a reasonable point, and reek of shill. Stay Classy Tweed.. Tell us about more of your insider information that you just heard through the grapevine. Oh please, may we have pictures of the "Grow off"..... LOL. Get your shit together.
" MMAR product didn't have to be tested like MMPR product. I'm not saying you're wrong about it's quality"
I never made any remarks as to the quality of MMAR weed being better. I appreciate that's the standard response. My point to you is simply: It's MMPR weed now, and it's MMPR weed that failed. All you're doing is telling us "but the liberals did it first".... don't give a damn, doesn't matter, MMPR's failure, period.