UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
I would not discriminate based on race
says the guy who endlessly defends white supremacy.
I would not discriminate based on race
who have you been "forced" to associate with?
I would not use force to make two parties interact if one did not want to.
Hypothetically speaking any person that owns something and is made to use it in ways they prefer not to has been forced.
Are you denying that ?
says the guy who endlessly defends white supremacy.
i'm asking YOU specifically, racistroy. who have you been FORCED to associate with?
Freedom doesn't require everybody to love one another. It does require everyone to let others live their lives though and not use force to insist on associating. You know that and have nowhere to go. By the way did you enjoy the red herring I speared for you?
Well your argument has been decided,,,and you are on the losing side.I'm not defending white supremacy. I would argue just as hard for the right of a Laotian to control his own property and not be made to interact with people that might shit on his floors or really any reason he found valid as long as he didn't try to control your property.
Now don't you feel stupid? No, you don't, because you are.
public business:
![]()
private business:
![]()
one business is open to the public, the other business is private and open only to members.
derp dee der, get it yet?
Well your argument has been decided,,,and you are on the losing side.
I'm not defending white supremacy.
So it IS okay to force people to associate?
how are you being forced ??So it IS okay to force people to associate? Did the rapists win? Damn.
Freedom with out equality is tyranny. Having exclusive deed upon what belongs to everyone so that you can discriminate and make profit by taking the excess value of those who are coerced to rent themselves out to you is aggressive and in no way anarchist.
Now I suspect that you will deflect by asking about the philosophy I am not advocating because you utterly fail to defend yours.
Anarchocapitalism (oxymoron) is a philosophy that was thought up by the corporate masters of the capitalist class by the perversion of language. It is privatization of the state apparatus, since capitalism can not exist without a state.
A better name, which is not an oxymoron would be neofeudalism.
All capitalism is crony.
how are you being forced ??
no one is FORCED to associate.
you'd have a point if private clubs were outlawed and people were not allowed to choose whether to open a public business or a private one. but that ain't how it is, ya white supremacist.
no one is forced to associate because everyone is allowed to open a private club, or to open nothing at all and just sit at home, not associating.
what you want are special rights for whites to cause harm to blacks which existed before civil rights was passed.
sorry, my white supremacist amiga, that ain't allowed anymore. we saw the harm it caused and outlawed it because no one has a right to cause harm.
go cry now.
how are you being forced ??
did you home school your kids. I asked this before, but you never answered. you don't have to .just curiousReally?
How are public schools funded again Mr. Nobody is Forced? Wars? "Free healthcare" ?
Okay. Who has the right to make people associate against their will? Of course this question will be dodged by you. You are quite nimble for a person with a gerbil in his pants.
Really?
How are public schools funded again Mr. Nobody is Forced?
If there is a threat to a person of a penalty or a loss of their property for not complying with an edict how are they NOT being forced?