darrellduaner
Active Member
whatchu say? dont make me buss a cap in yo ass. oh shit. we are prone to violence.
okay
for the good of society im gonna go hang myself.
Before the gun control nuts come out of the woodwork
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
okay
for the good of society im gonna go hang myself.
DonAlejandroVega
Well-Known Member
even just a nasty look from Chuck can kill..........
darrellduaner
Active Member
im deeply disturbed that that post was liked even once. but its iight
We didn't bother to define lethality.
A Glock 19 can fire off 15 rounds in about 5 ssecods.
A cross bow in the hands of a skilled bowman can fire two or three shots a minute.
No aiming time in those figures.
Each projectile the Glock fires isn't as lethal, I'll give you that, but it can dispense death more quickly, the average person can kill with a Glock, and one has to train with a cross bow.
But the bow, in one form or another, is no where near as lethal overall as the gun. This is why it has been taken over by the gun everywhere death is the objective.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
read it for yourself. the heller decision is the most recent one to state outright that your line of idiotic rebuttal about the absoluteness of "infringe" is completely out of line.
tightpockt
Well-Known Member
Hypothetical question:
say scientists develop a pill that when taken, allowed you to point your finger at anybody and kill them. who would support said pill being sold in stores to the public?
say scientists develop a pill that when taken, allowed you to point your finger at anybody and kill them. who would support said pill being sold in stores to the public?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
One shot from a bow and youre dead, vest or not, from a considerable range at considerable accuracy.
Glock 19 is more of a "in the house" sort of a range, with multiple shots required for a guaranteed kill.
Do I get to shoot lightning bolts from my fingers? If so, Im sold.
darrellduaner
Active Member
oh you mean the opinion of 5 psychopaths? okay since they hold a particular opinion, i guess i agree now. but what about the 45% of them that disagree?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
OK, then go find any decision anywhere from any time from the SCOTUS upholding the absolutism of "shall not infringe".
it doesn't exist.
whenever the second amendment has come before the SCOTUS, they have looked at it in a reasonable way, never in an absolutist fashion that you seem to think applies.
only morons believe in the absolutism of the second.
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Australia implemented a massive purge of guns in 1996, which included bans on "assault weapons" and other semi-automatic rifles and shotguns. They also did forced buybacks and then entered into a strict licensing and registration agreement where certain single-shot rifles and similar firearms could be owned but only if the owner provided justification for the possession of such a weapon.
Yet 17 years after the implementation of gun control schemes that are very similar in many ways to those being pushed by Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Joe Manchin (D-WV), and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the NSW police department is launching a new operation to rein in gun violence.
The lesson: criminals do not pay attention to gun bans. They never have and they never will.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
tell me about how many mass murders australia has had since 1996.
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
So 3 people are now considered a mass murder.
Hell in detroit that would just rank as a fare night.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i didn't make any comments about what happens here in america, i asked you to tell me about australia.
do you need me to write it in crayon?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
If you discount the Democratic strongholds in the inner cities, the US has a lower crime rate using guns than Europe.
"Mass murders" have held constant for decades. They are the work of crazy people and can't be prevented.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yes, as long as we focus on disparate, sparsely populated areas where no one lives, we are doing pretty OK.
PROPAGANDA.
how's australia been doing on mass murders lately (as in the last few decades)?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
How many murders are committed with "assault weapons", yet you gun grabbers pop a vein in your collective forehead about "assault weapons".
Propaganda.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you really have no clue what propaganda is, and you are demonstrating it.
does everyone here remember how impossible it was to defend yourself between 1994 and 2004? those years were hell. kept on having to fight off hordes of invaders with a stick because of the assault rifle ban.
darrellduaner
Active Member
remember that scene in the matrix, when everyone gets a gun pointed at their head? why does nobody shoot?
darrellduaner
Active Member
okay, and i never said i did. but i dont believe that it needs any alteration at this point in time so you can take your 'my daddy said' argument somewhere else. its just an opinion.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
then what did you mean when you said "i guess deese negroes don't know what the word 'infringe' means"?
kinda seems like you were hinting that the second amendment is absolute.