What are your political deal breakers?

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
so don't give a single fuck; but also don't sling-shot yourself into a hot topic, and scream, "owww, I'm getting burned."
NTs are plain stupid. People like me can put up with way more shit than you could dream of. But there's a point when enough is enough. At that point we snap. I find it really hilarious when mentally ill people go on a rage quit. The only one I feel for is the one who did it. Instead of thinking, "hey, we need to not fuck with people like him because he'll kill at a 1:6 ratio," instead they make threads making fun. What would be karmic is if a person who made those threads eventually was one of their "victims."
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
NTs are plain stupid. People like me can put up with way more shit than you could dream of. But there's a point when enough is enough. At that point we snap. I find it really hilarious when mentally ill people go on a rage quit. The only one I feel for is the one who did it. Instead of thinking, "hey, we need to not fuck with people like him because he'll kill at a 1:6 ratio," instead they make threads making fun. What would be karmic is if a person who made those threads eventually was one of their "victims."
smoke a joint, and go to bed, and stop getting all fucked up in the head over this bullshit............goodnight
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
freeing men.........caused "animosity?" too fucking bad.
Look, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you. But look at the situation logically.

The civil war freed the slaves, and pissed off the slave owners. In their view they had been robbed. They spent the next few decades trying to get it back. Criminal sentences to forced farm labor.

I'm not commenting on the right or wrong of it, but the is.

Had the civil war not happend, and slavery been given a free hand, it would have went past 1865. But it would have likely ended prior to 1900.

Race relations wouldn't not have devolved after because of forced emancipation.

Life was hard on all blacks for a long time.

Hard to tell if the slaves, or the free, impoverished no freedoms blacks from 1880 to 1950 had it harder.

I guess my point is that the civil war set race relations back over 100 years. Not civil rights. How well the two races got along.

We would all be better off today had there been no forced emancipation.

Blacks included.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
But there's a point when enough is enough. At that point we snap. I find it really hilarious when mentally ill people go on a rage quit.
we all found it quite hilarious when you rage-quit after the election. that was splendid.

and you are making the case for prohibiting assburger gun ownership better than we ever could.
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
I understand that slavery was dying, and the war was fought over tariffs, not emancipation. slavery would have ended by 1900, but vestiges of it would have remained. maybe by today, they would have the vote, and by 2070, be catching up economically. not good enough. the Fed could have just bought them all, like Britain did. it would have cost less than the Civil War. I'm not fighting either; that's Buck's job. I just stand strongly for the freedom of all people, and hearing about the butt-hurt of plantation owners over emancipation is not a just motive for Jim Crow, in my eyes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Look, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you. But look at the situation logically.

The civil war freed the slaves, and pissed off the slave owners. In their view they had been robbed. They spent the next few decades trying to get it back. Criminal sentences to forced farm labor.

I'm not commenting on the right or wrong of it, but the is.

Had the civil war not happend, and slavery been given a free hand, it would have went past 1865. But it would have likely ended prior to 1900.

Race relations wouldn't not have devolved after because of forced emancipation.

Life was hard on all blacks for a long time.

Hard to tell if the slaves, or the free, impoverished no freedoms blacks from 1880 to 1950 had it harder.

I guess my point is that the civil war set race relations back over 100 years. Not civil rights. How well the two races got along.

We would all be better off today had there been no forced emancipation.

Blacks included.
so black families should have endured another 50 or so years of slavery so that racist like you wouldn't be so bitter?

i'd love to see you preach this in real life.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
we all found it quite hilarious when you rage-quit after the election. that was splendid.

and you are making the case for prohibiting assburger gun ownership better than we ever could.
I'm good at pretending when I need to. People only find me slightly odd since I found Buddhism. That's not enough to take away my guns.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm good at pretending when I need to. People only find me slightly odd since I found Buddhism. That's not enough to take away my guns.
i guess we have to wait for you to snap or go through with the death pact you have with your wife.

pacifism fail.
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
do i need to show you the secession papers again?

the war was explicitly fought over slavery. the seceding states even said so in the first line.
and Iraq was about WMD, and WWI to stop the Hun, and Vietnam to keep communism away from America, and, and, and........
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
do i need to show you the secession papers again?

the war was explicitly fought over slavery. the seceding states even said so in the first line.
The North was just as guilty for their actions as well. They used blacks as cannon fodder who died at over twice the rate of white people. Or you saying black people are just not very good soldiers?

To the North blacks were an unfair advantage, much like how liberals use unions to bitch about robots taking their jobs or the Republicans about Mexicans sneaking over the border. They didn't give a shit about blacks were human too.
 
Top