i think 4 would replace a 1000 watt.(mine pulls 245 at the wall)I'm still trying to get a feel for how many I'd need in my application. Are two enough to directly substitute for an HPS thouie? Therefore, would four be enough to replace two thousand watt HPS lamps?
Another responder above posted a link to units that pull around 340W. Three would directly replace on a watt for watt basis, but they are said to produce much more ppf than HPS. I'm wondering if two would suffice in that case.i think 4 would replace a 1000 watt.(mine pulls 245 at the wall)
I used to run 2 allstart 330's. they covered a little more area than a 1000w. 2 cmh would match yield of a 1000w and bud size. qaulity was far better under cmh...Another responder above posted a link to units that pull around 340W. Three would directly replace on a watt for watt basis, but they are said to produce much more ppf than HPS. I'm wondering if two would suffice in that case.
Do you still run them? Why/why not? If you were undertaking a lighting upgrade project starting today, what would your choice be and why?I used to run 2 allstart 330's. they covered a little more area than a 1000w. 2 cmh would match yield of a 1000w and bud size. qaulity was far better under cmh...
Do you still run them? Why/why not? If you were undertaking a lighting upgrade project starting today, what would your choice be and why?
I'm very interested in people's personal experience, good bad whatever lol
The ballast on the site you listed shows they run 120-277V. I'm already running 240V for my lighting so it wouldn't be a change.no I don't. My place was robbed last year. i lost everything. I almost went cmh again. I came into a bunch of money and said fuck it and got inda gros. Been happy ever since. I've thought about throwing up cmh's again. I'm waiting for the 120v ballast to come out for the elite agros..
That must have been a typo by genuity^^^ as the lec 315 pulls around 340-350watts per unit..... two should almost replace a mogul based 1000w hps.Another responder above posted a link to units that pull around 340W. Three would directly replace on a watt for watt basis, but they are said to produce much more ppf than HPS. I'm wondering if two would suffice in that case.
If you have no use for a reflector(extra $$$) i would look at the cerametek kits or advanced lighting solutions kit (240v) which is way cheaper....if available yet???Me like. I like the lower wattage too, cuts that heat load! How much would four cost? I wonder how many would qualify for a decent discount...
The Agro T12 would have to be very close in vert. Maybe stack 2 or 3...or put on a light mover. You could always get an 860w for only a $100 (requires a 1000w MH mag ballast)The ballast on the site you listed shows they run 120-277V. I'm already running 240V for my lighting so it wouldn't be a change.
I have a buddy who likes his indagro lights, too. I run a vertical 360° silo that requires an omnidirectional light source, which is why I am investigating the CMH.
EDIT; sorry, wasn't you, it was another poster above.
Plan is for two of these to be stacked vertically, socket butts together. A horizontal post holds them in position in the silo. I'm thinking I could fit two of these arrangements for a total of four lamps mounted vertically inside a six foot tall space. What do you think?The Agro T12 would have to be very close in vert. Maybe stack 2 or 3...or put on a light mover. You could always get an 860w for only a $100 (requires a 1000w MH mag ballast)
http://www.welthinkusa.com/ballast.php these are where i bought mine, hope that helps works on 120 or 240no I don't. My place was robbed last year. i lost everything. I almost went cmh again. I came into a bunch of money and said fuck it and got inda gros. Been happy ever since. I've thought about throwing up cmh's again. I'm waiting for the 120v ballast to come out for the elite agros..
That can't be......the bulb draws 315w alone without the ballast, maybe it's being dimmed by a faulty ballast? Did you check the kilowatt meter on a 40/60w incandescent bulb to make sure it's accurate?at wall
View attachment 3171655
i to was thinking it was my meter,but when i hook up the 400,it pulls 446(ill make sure of that # for sure)
You have to consider the height of the bulb, intensity, and the top and bottom 'dead zones' of the small bulb. I had plants 12"-14" from my 860w. IMO CMHs don't have the bulb length and intensity for a tall vert...unless you keep plants close, use at least 3 bulbs, or have a light mover.Plan is for two of these to be stacked vertically, socket butts together. A horizontal post holds them in position in the silo. I'm thinking I could fit two of these arrangements for a total of four lamps mounted vertically inside a six foot tall space. What do you think?
the meter is good,but i was expecting like you said around 340-350 at the wall.That can't be......the bulb draws 315w alone without the ballast, maybe it's being dimmed by a faulty ballast? Did you check the kilowatt meter on a 40/60w incandescent bulb to make sure it's accurate?
Aren't you concerned that it's absolutely running below specs by a significant margin?the meter is good,but i was expecting like you said around 340-350 at the wall.
the light reads the same on the other meter,even the amps are half(2.0 amp) on meters...and it should be 3.9
the light is working just fine,surpasses the 400's in veg by far.
Huh? Did I not just say four bulbs twice?You have to consider the height of the bulb, intensity, and the top and bottom 'dead zones' of the small bulb. I had plants 12"-14" from my 860w. IMO CMHs don't have the bulb length and intensity for a tall vert...unless you keep plants close, use at least 3 bulbs, or have a light mover.