ANOTHER BLOW TO OBAMA!!

[ginwilly]

For every job that your messiah has created he has also put 75 people on food stamps. Argument?

No way.

Do you have an approved source? I will accept huffpo, daily kos or msnbc. Oh, a blog that fits my opinion is also fine.

 

[greenlikemoney]

I was really waiting for a Lib. I'm sure they are now, or will be tomorrow, feverishly looking for an answer.
I'm a teacher, so it's homework.

 

[ginwilly]

I was really waiting for a Lib. I'm sure they are now, or will be tomorrow, feverishly looking for an answer.
I'm a teacher, so it's homework.

Oh easy game. It's bushney's fault. Or, if the pubs would stop being meanies... something along those lines.

 

[sheskunk]

This thread is so full of fail, and win. I love it.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

obama finally loses one...

Actually, this is the 12th unanimous defeat his administration has suffered, just since January 2012. That's right ladies and gentleman TWELVE. Almost every one of them involved attempts to expand Federal power through the DOJ. There was a nifty report back in April of 2013, when it stood at nine.

I'd be happy to provide a link if a request is made in the proper manner, through the proper channels.

 

[UncleBuck]

If you think I've ever cried that the government isn't doing enough you have me confused with your imaginary stereotype.

yeah, you hate the government until you have my IP and then it's time to call the FBI.

what does the F stand for by the way?



lol, small government.

 

[UncleBuck]

No way.

Do you have an approved source? I will accept huffpo, daily kos or msnbc. Oh, a blog that fits my opinion is also fine.

good to see you playing buddy buddy with a stand up fellow like greendummy.

birds of a feather.

 

[UncleBuck]

Actually, this is the 12th unanimous defeat his administration has suffered, just since January 2012. That's right ladies and gentleman TWELVE. Almost every one of them involved attempts to expand Federal power through the DOJ. There was a nifty report back in April of 2013, when it stood at nine.

I'd be happy to provide a link if a request is made in the proper manner, through the proper channels.

you won't provide a link because it will probably come from WND or some other retarded source that bends the truth even more than your baby peen is bent.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

you won't provide a link because it will probably come from WND or some other retarded source that bends the truth even more than your baby peen is bent.

Awesome rebuttal. Unfortunately for you, I don't need to provide a link. The SCOTUS decisions are a matter of record. I'm simply correcting an incorrect statement with fact. It's allllllllllll over the interweb, try the Guglée.

 

[UncleBuck]

Awesome rebuttal. Unfortunately for you, I don't need to provide a link. The SCOTUS decisions are a matter of record. I'm simply correcting an incorrect statement with fact. It's allllllllllll over the interweb, try the Guglée.

like i said, too pussy to provide a link. just like in the AGw debate.

well, i guess it's nto a debate, since you don't follow the rules of debate by citing your claims. it's more like you crying, then taking your ball and going home.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

like i said, too pussy to provide a link. just like in the AGw debate.

well, i guess it's nto a debate, since you don't follow the rules of debate by citing your claims. it's more like you crying, then taking your ball and going home.

Like I said, no reason to provide a link when it's a matter of record. Unless the SCOTUS website is run by the Heritage Foundation? Koch brothers?

Here ya go, I'll hook ya up this one time.

http://www.supremecourt.gov

 

[sheskunk]

like i said, too pussy to provide a link. just like in the AGw debate.

well, i guess it's nto a debate, since you don't follow the rules of debate by citing your claims. it's more like you crying, then taking your ball and going home.

You should just accept what is given and move on. The name calling and insults are not making you a happier person. It is causing turmoil within yourself that you then proceed to project upon others. It is a vicious cycle. Break the chain to find your inner peace.

 

[UncleBuck]

Like I said, no reason to provide a link when it's a matter of record. Unless the SCOTUS website is run by the Heritage Foundation? Koch brothers?

Here ya go, I'll hook ya up this one time.

http://www.supremecourt.gov

don't worry, i found your claim for you.

ted cruz.

that's pretty solid shit there, smarty. can't think for yourself, so let ted cruz do it for you.

 

[sheskunk]

don't worry, i found your claim for you.

ted cruz.

that's pretty solid shit there, smarty. can't think for yourself, so let ted cruz do it for you.

You are learning to be self-sufficient. You're coming along so fast. Now all you have to do is freshen up your attitude a little.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

don't worry, i found your claim for you.

ted cruz.

that's pretty solid shit there, smarty. can't think for yourself, so let ted cruz do it for you.

I believe he did compile the original list of the first nine unanimous defeats of the administration and authored a report that came out in April of 2013.

I don't believe he has written anything about the three subsequent unanimous defeats that occurred since his report.

Regardless of who's writing or commenting about them, the 12 unanimous defeats stand as fact.

Unless, you have facts that prove otherwise?

 

[UncleBuck]

I believe he did compile the original list of the first nine unanimous defeats of the administration and authored a report that came out in April of 2013.

I don't believe he has written anything about the three subsequent unanimous defeats that occurred since his report.

Regardless of who's writing or commenting about them, the 12 unanimous defeats stand as fact.

Unless, you have facts that prove otherwise?

you still haven't even established your claim yet.

you need to cite the 12 cases and describe how each one matches the description you gave it earlier.

that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence too.

 

[NLXSK1]

You should just accept what is given and move on. The name calling and insults are not making you a happier person. It is causing turmoil within yourself that you then proceed to project upon others. It is a vicious cycle. Break the chain to find your inner peace.

Or he could put down the beer... Naah....

 

[NLXSK1]

you still haven't even established your claim yet.

you need to cite the 12 cases and describe how each one matches the description you gave it earlier.

that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence too.

I feel like I can speak for MuyLocoNC and say go suck a dozen dicks....

You would just attack the source of the information and sidetrack the thread anyway. You are not worthy of citations.

 

[UncleBuck]

Actually, this is the 12th unanimous defeat his administration has suffered, just since January 2012. That's right ladies and gentleman TWELVE. Almost every one of them involved attempts to expand Federal power through the DOJ. There was a nifty report back in April of 2013, when it stood at nine.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/134743219/The-Legal-Limit-The-Obama-Administration-s-Attempts-to-Expand-Federal-Power

there it is^^^



they list SB1070 as one of the cases. obama handed arizona their ass on that one. they gutted the bill. they left one single part out of four standing, and gave guidelines for enforcing it so strict that it's simply a lawsuit waiting to happen.

this is what happens when idiots repeat what other idiots are saying.

no wonder you were too embarrassed to even cite or discuss it in any way.

 

[UncleBuck]

I feel like I can speak for MuyLocoNC and say go suck a dozen dicks....

You would just attack the source of the information and sidetrack the thread anyway. You are not worthy of citations.

i guess i have to cite it myself and laugh at it.

you guys could try arguing, or you could just hide under ted cruz's canadian born skirt and lob rocks.