sheskunk
Well-Known Member
how would you characterize this?
Do you ever get tired of listening to yourself?
how would you characterize this?
Supposed?by the way, can you name some of the citizens on this supposed hit list?
so absolutely no evidence of this citizen hit list then? the one that just moments ago you said was why he deserved to go to prison?Supposed?
And yes, O shares those lists with me, but I promised I wouldn't post it on a pot forum.
You bump your head?
I'll give you a hint tho, one of the hits was declared guilty using his correspondence with the ft hood shooter, that he calls work place violence costing families of the shooter survivor pay... For political reasons. Also not an impeachable offense, but also vile.
It is a bigoted comment... So what?how would you characterize this?
... just prattling on about imaginary stuff, the very existence of which you can't even substantiate.
[citation needed]Yeah, because YOU would never do that.
that's exactly why apache junction is so explanatory.It is a bigoted comment... So what?
Drones Buck.by the way, can you name some of the citizens on this supposed hit list?
Better than the intolerance you practice day in and day out...that's exactly why apache junction is so explanatory.
casual bigotry, no big deal.
You should stop flinging your poo and do something with your life. We all have opinions, that's just mine.The hit list not one of them.so absolutely no evidence of this citizen hit list then? the one that just moments ago you said was why he deserved to go to prison?
usually you need evidence and stuff to put someone in prison.
anyhoo, i invite you to try to use your diminutive mental faculties once again to come up with a high crime or misdemeanor instead of just prattling on about imaginary stuff, the very existence of which you can't even substantiate.
you should probably stop rotting what's left of your brain with links to WND from white supremacists like your buddy desert dude.
your argument is that bigotry is better than intolerance of bigotry in political debate?Better than the intolerance you practice day in and day out...
Save your judgments of racism and bigots and pedophiles for your wife, not conversing politics on a public forum.your argument is that bigotry is better than intolerance of bigotry in political debate?
save your bigotry for when you're out fishing with your buddy, not conversing politics on a public forum.
a citizen hit list is different from a legal memo justifying why he took out a terrorist.You should stop flinging your poo and do something with your life. We all have opinions, that's just mine.The hit list not one of them.
A 160 some page PDF was just released by a FOIA. It showed Obama's legal justification for his hit list. I would link it, but you won't read it, you'll just make it about me.
You could have used his legal justification to defend his actions, instead you chose to deny its existence. You are going to look really stupid when you change your tune from nut uh you racist to saying but it's legal cause he said so you racist.
so you are intolerant of those who call out bigots?Save your judgments of racism and bigots and pedophiles for your wife, not conversing politics on a public forum.
This post looks like an actual attempt at real discussion from you. Nice job.a citizen hit list is different from a legal memo justifying why he took out a terrorist.
taking out terrorists that pose a threat to americans is not a high crime or misdemeanor, not bribery, not treason.
maybe before this shitfest of a thread devolves further you can actually come up with one of those grounds for impeachment.
so i guess you're giving up on your citizen hit list farce then.This post looks like an actual attempt at real discussion from you. Nice job.
What crime was Alawaki charged with? Being a terrorist? That's anyone in the tea party to you guys.
What was the crime he was found guilty of?
an imaginary hit list that you can't cite with american citizens you can't name.A hit list with US citizens is a better way to put it.
what would move the discussion along is for it to begin in the first place.Will that move the discussion along?
distracting from the topic of this thread, which is to nam an actual impeachable offense, is not gonna help the discussion along.Are you cool with president Palin having this authority?
You look really uninformed, it's not a huge secret.an imaginary hit list that you can't cite with american citizens you can't name.
that's one hell of a case for throwing the president into prison, shit for brains.