Hobby Lobby Decision..

desert dude

Well-Known Member
corporations are not people..corporations are formed in order to protect the owners..corporations don't "think" and cannot have opinion..their owners have the opinion.

Be there 10AM EST or be square..

:mrgreen:
You lose! What do you know, the Supremes actually still think the first amendment means something. :-)
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I fixed the quote in your sig for you.

I'm not going to apologize for overstepping my legal authority, while my political opponents refuse to implement my political agenda against the will of the constituents who elected them.

~barack hussein obama
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I don't think this is 1st A
issue

It was an attack on the Separation Clause that failed
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Wow, I haven't seen Doer be so correct in a long time. This decision by the Supremes is correct. The constitution is the law of the land. Our leaders have disobeyed the constitution and it has led to all manner of mischief, the drug war being the most mischievous of the lot.

Women still get to make their own medical decisions, as is proper, but they don't get to force people who disagree with those decisions to pay for them, as is proper.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
You lefties are making a very serious long-term mistake by waging your war against religious freedom. It is going to back fire on you, and all of us will suffer because of it.

This simple advice comes to you from an atheist.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Wow, I haven't seen Doer be so correct in a long time. This decision by the Supremes is correct. The constitution is the law of the land. Our leaders have disobeyed the constitution and it has led to all manner of mischief, the drug war being the most mischievous of the lot.

Women still get to make their own medical decisions, as is proper, but they don't get to force people who disagree with those decisions to pay for them, as is proper.
since when?

with closing of clinics that offer womens services in certain states?

or perhaps the permission we must seek in order to terminate a pregnancy in certain states?

yeah we get to make our own decisions.

and here we see the republican committee for womens rights below:



:lol:
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
since when?

with closing of clinics that offer womens services in certain states?

or perhaps the permission we must seek in order to terminate a pregnancy in certain states?

yeah we get to make out own decisions.

the republican committee for womens rights:

Sally forth and buy some contraceptives. With your own money. Some midol might be a good idea as well. :-)
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Midol.

That is a misogynistic comment. Maybe you need to buff up on some testosterone to get past male PMS.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Midol.

That is a misogynistic comment. Maybe you need to buff up on some testosterone to get past male PMS.
what were you expecting from the guy?

his entire worldview is white supremacy, misogyny, and the like.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Can't a guy throw out a simple snarky comment without you girls getting all emotional?

Doer, I am disappointed. You actually made a few coherent points today and now you think Midol, a chemical concoction designed to help women get past their hysterical moments, is a misogynistic tool. ;-)
 

Ra$p0tin

Well-Known Member
it's really creepy that your employer can make your health desicions.

it's really creepy that you have to have governmental mandatory uneccessary vaginal probes prior to termination services in certain states.

it's really creepy the kocks make light of governmental infringment which just came true with hobby lobby:


EDIT: the RIGHT keeps telling us: big bad government intruding in your life and YET it's the RIGHT who forces it..FINANCIAL CONSERVATISM.. and YET it's the RIGHT that shuts down government to the tune of $29B.

what's wrong with this picture?

with our "checks and balances" system when you can't get anything done in 6 years..i don't think our forefathers had this in mind.
Maybe they did and that's why nothing is 6 years.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
SCOTUS lost its moral and ethical credibility with me when they affirmed that money was equivalent to free speech.

Clearly, they're nothing more than corporate greedheads themselves.
Did you have a problem with unions making unlimited campaign contributions? No?
 
Top