your laughable source aside, your implication that all foreigners are dirty, disease ridden problems waiting to happen is completely expected coming from you.Today's Lesson in unexpected consequences....
Thinking outside the humanitarian box....
People that are in charge do not govern their deeds by the law of unintended consequences ....
They govern by not whats best but for their legacy...
A busted foreign policy... illegals streaming into the country...but we must care....
What is the worst thing that could happen?
http://www.naturalnews.com/045773_pandemic_outbreak_mass_migration_public_health_risk.html
They are from South America...just sayin'...your laughable source aside, your implication that all foreigners are dirty, disease ridden problems waiting to happen is completely expected coming from you.
Buck... we have a great nation we agree... we [excepts idiots/Jenny Mc /and That Texas Mega Church] give our kids shots...your laughable source aside, your implication that all foreigners are dirty, disease ridden problems waiting to happen is completely expected coming from you.
Canada's economy didn't contract, and they had a bad winter, too.Aggregate GDP is becoming a relic of a metric, on its own. The hypothesis of the weather affecting the output is very plausible. It may have had its own "economic stimulus" profile (snow plows and consumables, etc.), but whatever it "produced" was dwarfed by the losses in the "normal" economy. What will happen in Q2? If there was pent-up demand, it will be visible as an "overshoot" relative to trend.
To which, St. Louis FED has put out the following today:
FRED Adds 609 Industry-Specific GDP Series
Posted on June 26, 2014
FRED has added 609 quarterly series published by the BEA for the first time. These series track gross output, value added, and intermediate inputs for 22 industry sectors.
Now that's detail...a better picture overall will be more likely extrapolated from binned data such as that.
Really? I trust I don't need to belabor the point of how Canada is accustomed to winter's cycle (we live in igloos and all that other funny shit). An extra meter of snow is not going be as disruptive here, as it would be along the Eastern seaboard of the contiguous states.Canada's economy didn't contract, and they had a bad winter, too.
Canadians are pussies though. In America we wear gloves and care not what the thermometer says.We are accustomed to shutting down operations for at least a couple weeks in winter, too, since trying to use your hands when your spit freezes on walls within seconds is damn near impossible.
Without data, honesty is meaningless. One can be honestly deluded, too.We've had bad winters before, without this effect. Let's be honest here. Obama supporters will grasp at any excuse to explain away failed policies. Such as pretending the poor living conditions in Central America that have been there for decades are the cause of the new, unprecedented inrush of immigration of minors. This is simply illogical. But his supporters simply choose to ignore reality.
Canadians are pussies though. In America we wear gloves and care not what the thermometer says.
Vague reference to delusion and lunacy when the obvious is stated. Let's not accuse the other of either. I have no knowledge of this "FRED" you speak off.Without data, honesty is meaningless. One can be honestly deluded, too.
It's akin to sincerity, and how the most sincere person you'll ever meet is the naked lunatic, chasing you down an alley wielding an axe.
That's why I applied a caveat at the end of my qualitative comparison.
Have you checked out the new FRED tools and layout?
Oh! I guess you didn't follow-up on my earlier links which you originally quoted.Vague reference to delusion and lunacy when the obvious is stated. Let's not accuse the other of either. I have no knowledge of this "FRED" you speak off.
I don't recall quoting such a link.Oh! I guess you didn't follow-up on my earlier links which you originally quoted.
FRED is the data interface provided by the Federal Reserve of St. Louis. It is a useful resource for economic data in the US, and it now has expanded features (like GEOFRED with maps). You can see geographical data, such as what happened with GDP along the Eastern seaboard, for example.
I'm a little surprised you don't know about it, actually, considering how many times over the last year it's been used in this forum.
Vague? Perhaps the reference to this winter's GDP shock is vague, but the information presented is anything but. The point being, if you want to definitively conclude the greater reason for the lower GDP was due to something other than the weather, you'll need some data to back that up. Hence, the link to FRED's new data-sets.Derp, I found the reference to FRED. Kind of vague....."plausible" isn't exactly a glowing endorsement. Not even sure that came from FRED, could just be from an article that referenced FRED. Sort of like: "Martians invaded Earth today. The AMA is the representative body for the medical profession"
How is it my obligation to disprove your contention? If I claimed I was 3,000 years old, is it your obligation to disprove it? We've had plenty of bad weather in the past without a whopping 3% contraction in GDP. Why was last winter different?Vague? Perhaps the reference to this winter's GDP shock is vague, but the information presented is anything but. The point being, if you want to definitively conclude the greater reason for the lower GDP was due to something other than the weather, you'll need some data to back that up. Hence, the link to FRED's new data-sets.
Is my original intent clearer now?
Ci sei? C'e lo fai? Sei connesso?