Travan Martin all over again??

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
it's not a claim that needs any proving. it has been proved.

that you try to deny he is a racist who ran a eugenics organization and heaps praise upon people who say the constitution should not protect blacks honestly makes me wonder if you are mentally retarded.

who do you think you are deluding? you can't even delude yourself into thinking he's not a racist.

unless, of course, you are mentally retarded. which i am starting to think you are.
repeating the claim doesnt prove the claim.

what papers he authored have been banned by canada's speech codes?

when was he thrown off the faculty of his university for his "racism"?

how many times was he arrested for hate crimes?

how many times was he convicted for hate crimes?

how many black people did he lynch, road haul, or beat with a club?

meanwhile Maggie Sanger spoke to the KKK ladies auxiliary many times and was warmly received each time.
the KKK was a huge supporter of her Negro Plan .
two groups of good democrats coming together for the dream of a negro free america... utterly charming!

but thats ok, cuz her message was so important. but phillippe rushton, a canadian psychologist, anthropologist and behaviourist, well accredited in his field studies the ACTUAL measurable differences between the races, and "That's Racist!!"
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Maggie Sanger spoke to the KKK ladies auxiliary many times and was warmly received each time.
rushton spoke to american renaissance about eugenics and was warmly received each time.

he even went to speak to at a conference whose stated goal was to "defend america's judeo-christian heritage and european identity from immigrants, muslims, and blacks".

kinda sounds like defending "REAL AMERICA from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit".

all of which is somehow totally not racist.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
rushton spoke to american renaissance about eugenics and was warmly received each time.

he even went to speak to at a conference whose stated goal was to "defend america's judeo-christian heritage and european identity from immigrants, muslims, and blacks".

kinda sounds like defending "REAL AMERICA from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit".

all of which is somehow totally not racist.
so american rennaissance is a racist organization, on a par with the Klan, and this conference (american rennaissance, where one event becomes multiple accusations) was full of racists too?

youre gonna have to back that shit up, if you want to Guilt By Association a well respected academic with these charges.

meanwhile sanger's crazy was so profound, it is undeniable.
she wouldnt shut up about it, and lefties still try to distance themselves from her, but cant bring themselves to actually speak the truth about their saint of abortions.

if you cant find any actual evidence of Rushton's racism (kinda like the clear proof of racism i can provide from Sanger), then you should STFU about a guy who i quoted ONCE, because he published a well recieved and widely cited paper on the subject at hand, in another thread, just before you declared him to be my personal hero.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
so american rennaissance is a racist organization, on a par with the Klan, and this conference (american rennaissance, where one event becomes multiple accusations) was full of racists too?

youre gonna have to back that shit up, if you want to Guilt By Association a well respected academic with these charges.

meanwhile sanger's crazy was so profound, it is undeniable.
she wouldnt shut up about it, and lefties still try to distance themselves from her, but cant bring themselves to actually speak the truth about their saint of abortions.

if you cant find any actual evidence of Rushton's racism (kinda like the clear proof of racism i can provide from Sanger), then you should STFU about a guy who i quoted ONCE, because he published a well recieved and widely cited paper on the subject at hand, in another thread, just before you declared him to be my personal hero.
Jumping to wild conclusions happens in UB's noggin all the time. He then repeats those ridiculous conclusions endlessly, referring to them as if they are established facts, not just his own delusions. It's an interesting little world he creates for himself to live in, a world where reality has no place. I'm just glad he plays for team Crazy Fucking Lefties.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so american rennaissance is a racist organization, on a par with the Klan, and this conference (american rennaissance, where one event becomes multiple accusations) was full of racists too?
you are either literally retarded or working overtime to play dumb.

you know who else speaks at american renaissance conferences?

former KKK grandwizard david duke (rushton helps former KKK grandwizard david duke with his books and publications by the way).

you know who american renaissance was founded by?

white nationalist jared taylor.

you know who jared taylor got his funding from?

phillipe rushton over at the pioneer fund, a eugenicist think tank.

just take a look at the comments under any article that american renaissance posts. i'll post some if you want. they match a lot of your comments verbatim.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Jumping to wild conclusions happens in UB's noggin all the time. He then repeats those ridiculous conclusions endlessly, referring to them as if they are established facts, not just his own delusions. It's an interesting little world he creates for himself to live in, a world where reality has no place. I'm just glad he plays for team Crazy Fucking Lefties.
good job on defending a white supremacist again.

i'm starting to see a pattern here.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
he probably means mulatto in the historical sense of the word, not in the slur sense of the word. just like rob roy when he calls the president a mulatto over and over again.

 

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
how is it relevant in any way when the cop had no clue about it?
It's relevant because it WAS a factor in how Brown and Johnson responded to the officer. If you read the Ferguson police report re: Burglary/Robbery it was kinda hard for the cop not to know the two were robbery suspects.
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
rushton spoke to american renaissance about eugenics and was warmly received each time.

he even went to speak to at a conference whose stated goal was to "defend america's judeo-christian heritage and european identity from immigrants, muslims, and blacks".

kinda sounds like defending "REAL AMERICA from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit".

all of which is somehow totally not racist.
Obama speaks to troops in Afghanistan on Thanksgiving and they clap for him, a warm reception if you will. And they probably don't like him too much. Reception isn't endorsement.

If Treyvan Martin had died in Afghanistan Barack Obama wouldn't even know his name.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
good job on defending a white supremacist again.

i'm starting to see a pattern here.
Please point out where I defended anyone. Another untrue and ridiculous conclusion, brought to you by our resident village idiot. I simply pointed out something that anyone that has read your posts already knows.

When Kynes declares himself a white supremacist, then your charge might hold water.
Labels assigned by you are spurious at best.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Please point out where I defended anyone. Another untrue and ridiculous conclusion, brought to you by our resident village idiot. I simply pointed out something that anyone that has read your posts already knows.

When Kynes declare himself a white supremacist, then your charge might hold water.
Labels assigned by you are spurious at best.
kynes rhetoric matches the rhetoric of a white supremacist at american renaissance precisely.

only a deluded stooge would be unable to see it.

so in your case, we have an explanation for why you don't see it.

54-40.
 

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
Please point out where I defended anyone. Another untrue and ridiculous conclusion, brought to you by our resident village idiot. I simply pointed out something that anyone that has read your posts already knows.

When Kynes declares himself a white supremacist, then your charge might hold water.
Labels assigned by you are spurious at best.
Do you agree with white nationalism or do you think it is racist?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
kynes rhetoric matches the rhetoric of a white supremacist at american renaissance precisely.

only a deluded stooge would be unable to see it.

so in your case, we have an explanation for why you don't see it.

54-40.
You are a laughable little fool. If you weren't so monotonous and boring, you'd still be monotonous and boring.

Six zeroes in a million.
 
Top