UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there are way more than 16 of them around here.
hell, shotgun420's white nationalist group had more than 25 members at one point.
there are way more than 16 of them around here.
Damn, you didn't fall for it. Or did you?A fat girl site where they eat cake and pretend to have interesting things to say?!
It's hard to account all the puppets those cunts have floating around.there are way more than 16 of them around here.
hell, shotgun420's white nationalist group had more than 25 members at one point.
You and I both know I don't fox with fat bitches. Or bitches in general.Damn, you didn't fall for it. Or did you?
HAHA, I see frosting on your nose!!
I can see how nice her personality is from here.To a right wing chubby chaser? Sure.
I hear You can't really tell they are women until you whip out the flour and give em a roll.You and I both know I don't fox with fat bitches. Or bitches in general.
So you prefer the older models...lol...Learning experience tonight.I can see how nice her personality is from here.
Also it appears she has no teeth, a bonus feature on that model.
And, yours isn't? I bet you've got tons of cake screen shots. I'd bet cash you've got all the uncut cupcake snaps. yummm.
I prefer my wife, but if you like men I don't care.So you prefer the older models...lol...Learning experience tonight.
Maybe for NoDrama. But, you...you are un-saveable. Cow.Save a load for me, sweety.
here you plagiarize rawn pawl (who is also a plagirizer) in defense of opposition to title II of civil rights.I have never opposed civil rights, citation please
No, jesus christ you are misinformed. Sen Paul was NEVER against the civil rights act, JUST title II, the part that forces private businesses into business deals.
You sound like someone from CNN or MSNBC, oh wait, I assume that's where you heard this drivel?
In a free society, we will tolerate boorish people, who have abhorrent behavior, but if we're civilized people, we publicly criticize that, and don't belong to those groups, or don't associate with those people. We shouldn't be out trying to create laws to force behavior, behavior should be coaxed, not coerced.
here you argue against the premise that denial of service caused harm.I also never said that blacks weren't harmed by denial of service I IN FACT said the opposite.
So if a guy runs out of gas and the owner of the gas station won't sell him any? How has the owner caused harm? The owner didn't cause the car to run out of gas. The owner did not force that customer to try and purchase gas. Do you go to gas stations that are closed and because they are closed cannot sell you any gas, does this harm you somehow? If you go past the local deli and see a "Closed" sign in the window, do you get your lawyers to sue them for actionable harm against you because they surely MUST be harming you if you aren't able to buy their products.
Please explain how you are harmed, if unable we will assume no harm has come to you due to these stores being closed and will just assume you know nothing as usual?
and here you argue against civil rights because of racist or bigoted food spitters.IFood spitter? I don't even know what that means, so I know you are just making shit up again.
you lie endlessly and get caught in your lies, vbecause you are no more intelligent than a fetid pile of horseshit boiling in the sun.In order to have a free country you have to realize that not everyone is going to act as you want them to, but that's ok because we should all be big enough to just move on and not attempt to force someone into serving us. You won't get good service and most likely they spat in your cake. Or worse.
Maybe for NoDrama. But, you...you are un-saveable. Cow.
here you plagiarize rawn pawl (who is also a plagirizer) in defense of opposition to title II of civil rights.
here you argue against the premise that denial of service caused harm.
and here you argue against civil rights because of racist or bigoted food spitters.
you lie endlessly and get caught in your lies, vbecause you are no more intelligent than a fetid pile of horseshit boiling in the sun.
So you were unable to prove any of your claims.here you plagiarize rawn pawl (who is also a plagirizer) in defense of opposition to title II of civil rights.
here you argue against the premise that denial of service caused harm.
and here you argue against civil rights because of racist or bigoted food spitters.
you lie endlessly and get caught in your lies, vbecause you are no more intelligent than a fetid pile of horseshit boiling in the sun.
You wouldn't understand if I tried to explain anyways, you unfathomable twat.I'm more the moose type. Or is that mousse?
You wouldn't understand if I tried to explain anyways, you unfathomable twat.
Sheskunk posts about pudding. That's hilarious.One has horns, one is pudding. It's really not that hard.