I thought you guys were "winning"...?

[UncleBuck]

You claimed to have a PHD, where is it?

wow, just wow.

 

[abandonconflict]

You claimed to have a PHD, where is it?

This is news to me.

 

[abandonconflict]

I decided not to go back to school, I don't have the money.

 

[jahbrudda]

my wife wears a size 8 or 10 and has 36D breasts.

This lady says she wears a size 10 too.


Your wife got back titties too?

 

[Padawanbater2]

My weathermen can't even get the weather report right on a regular basis just 1 day in advance.
I certainly believe we have an impact on climate, how much I don't know.
How much did dinosaur farts impact the climate? What about the 30-60 million bison on the plains before we came along and wiped them out? Sure is a lot of fertilizer coming from those asses.

Come up with a realistic alternate source of energy and I am all for it. Until then it is just barking up a tree, pissing in the wind.

People like your weatherman are who Morano asked if they believe in ACC or not

People like Charles and David Koch actively influence the ways in which viable alternatives are accepted, that's the problem. The science is settled, the manufactured "debate" exists only in the political realm.

 

[sheskunk]

I wear a size 10 and have 38D's.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I wear a size 10 and have 38D's.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/tits-or-gtfo.845147/

 

[Harrekin]

If they were awarding Honorary Doctorates in Bullshitology, you lefties would all be recipients with honours.

 

[UncleBuck]

If they were awarding Honorary Doctorates in Bullshitology, you lefties would all be recipients with honours.

yes, tell us more about how trickle down actually works and NASA forgot to take the sun into account on their global warming models.

 

[Padawanbater2]

If they were awarding Honorary Doctorates in Bullshitology, you lefties would all be recipients with honours.

You are delusional. Do you know what that word means? It's a person who has false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions. Nearly every credible scientist on the planet Earth accepts ACC as the cause of the recent climate change. In every other facet of your life, you rely on these exact same scientists to provide the lifestyle you're accustomed to, but when it comes to climate, all of a sudden none of them know what the fuck they're doing, or they're all politically biased. Even when you're shown the sources you rely on to support your agenda have obvious conflicts of interest, you don't relent.

The vast majority of the western world accepts ACC, just like they accept the theory of evolution. The difference between the rest of the world and the United States is the well funded active propaganda campaign that circulates throughout American media, as cited dozens of times on this forum.

For you to believe the bullshit you do, it would require tens of thousands of scientists to be in on it, a global conspiracy to subvert truth from leading experts who've built their careers over decades, do you even understand the scope of said conspiracy? What that would mean, what would be needed to pull something like that off and for not a single leak to get out in more than 40 years of study? It would be easier to make me a theist (impossible).

You're a 'climate-truther' (I'm coining that term, just for you)

All of this and yet you still relent. Really all you're doing is wasting your breath, like I said and like most of us - the ones that understand how science works - accept, the change is inevitable. Your generation will die off in the next few decades and the rest of us will be your age now with the younger generations only becoming more accepting as time passes. What are you hoping to accomplish by remaining diligent in your ignorance? It's going to happen, whether you like it or not, and time is on our side, compadre.

400K+, and each IPCC assessment only strengthens the case.

Conservatives might as well be beavers when it comes to understanding modern science.

 

[Harrekin]

You are delusional. Do you know what that word means? It's a person who has false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions. Nearly every credible scientist on the planet Earth accepts ACC as the cause of the recent climate change. In every other facet of your life, you rely on these exact same scientists to provide the lifestyle you're accustomed to, but when it comes to climate, all of a sudden none of them know what the fuck they're doing, or they're all politically biased. Even when you're shown the sources you rely on to support your agenda have obvious conflicts of interest, you don't relent.

The vast majority of the western world accepts ACC, just like they accept the theory of evolution. The difference between the rest of the world and the United States is the well funded active propaganda campaign that circulates throughout American media, as cited dozens of times on this forum.

For you to believe the bullshit you do, it would require tens of thousands of scientists to be in on it, a global conspiracy to subvert truth from leading experts who've built their careers over decades, do you even understand the scope of said conspiracy? What that would mean, what would be needed to pull something like that off and for not a single leak to get out in more than 40 years of study? It would be easier to make me a theist (impossible).

You're a 'climate-truther' (I'm coining that term, just for you)

All of this and yet you still relent. Really all you're doing is wasting your breath, like I said and like most of us - the ones that understand how science works - accept, the change is inevitable. Your generation will die off in the next few decades and the rest of us will be your age now with the younger generations only becoming more accepting as time passes. What are you hoping to accomplish by remaining diligent in your ignorance? It's going to happen, whether you like it or not, and time is on our side, compadre.

400K+, and each IPCC assessment only strengthens the case.

Conservatives might as well be beavers when it comes to understanding modern science.

IPCC publications are rife with speculation and half truths.

I say we need to redouble efforts for actual hard scientific research that benefits humanity and reduces our emissions of all kinds, not just your sort of wishy washy bullshit pseudo-scientific horseshit.

Same effect in the end, mine is based on a want to improve our species and planet...yours is based on predictions that "something shit will happen eventually, just wait".

 

[Padawanbater2]

IPCC publications are rife with speculation and half truths.

I say we need to redouble efforts for actual hard scientific research that benefits humanity and reduces our emissions of all kinds, not just your sort of wishy washy bullshit pseudo-scientific horseshit.

Same effect in the end, mine is based on a want to improve our species and planet...yours is based on predictions that "something shit will happen eventually, just wait".

How the fuck would you know what the IPCC is "rife with"? You gonna lie now and say you've actually read all 5 reports? You gonna flaunt that ego some more and tell me how much smarter you are than the worlds leading scientists when it comes to studying the fuckin' climate?

Do you tell your doctor he's an idiot when he tells you you've contracted another STD? Or do you shut your mouth and go fill your prescription because he probably knows what's best for you because he spent the better part of a decade studying the shit?

Take your doctors advice, shut the fuck up

 

[Harrekin]

How the fuck would you know what the IPCC is "rife with"? You gonna lie now and say you've actually read all 5 reports? You gonna flaunt that ego some more and tell me how much smarter you are than the worlds leading scientists when it comes to studying the fuckin' climate?

Do you tell your doctor he's an idiot when he tells you you've contracted another STD? Or do you shut your mouth and go fill your prescription because he probably knows what's best for you because he spent the better part of a decade studying the shit?

Take your doctors advice, shut the fuck up

I've read most of the earlier reports, I've also read summaries of the differences between the volumes.

Reducing levels of certainty, poor forecasting that has been proven inaccurate, etc.

Are you saying you've read the reports cover to cover?

A leftie who can't get himself better than a minimum wage job thinks he's smarter than everyone else?

What a fucking rarity...

Go rape someone, its probably the only thing you're good for.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I've read most of the earlier reports, I've also read summaries of the differences between the volumes.

Reducing levels of certainty, poor forecasting that has been proven inaccurate, etc.

Are you saying you've read the reports cover to cover?

A leftie who can't get himself better than a minimum wage job thinks he's smarter than everyone else?

What a fucking rarity...

Go rape someone, its probably the only thing you're good for.

Then you're "rife with" lies

"everyone else" = the tiny minority who doesn't accept ACC? YEP!

Evolution deniers, ACC deniers, holocaust deniers.. aka, you, yeah, I completely exceed you in every aspect of intellect.

You think you're smarter than the tens of thousands of Ph.D's contracted to figure out the problem, you're like that black general in Armageddon who wants to blow up the asteroid by launching nukes at it, I'm the British counterpart calling you a retard from across the table, and the IPCC plays Billy Bobs part telling you to sit down and shut your cock holster because somebody smart is talking

What, you think ACC/climate change is going away? It's going to be a staple in the next presidential election, and I guarantee you, BOTH parties, R & D are going to agree something needs to be done about it, because even though the Republicans are stupid as fuck, they're not nearly as stupid as someone like you who thinks they can get elected by denying it exists.

 

[UncleBuck]

I've read most of the earlier reports, I've also read summaries of the differences between the volumes.

Reducing levels of certainty, poor forecasting that has been proven inaccurate, etc.

Are you saying you've read the reports cover to cover?

A leftie who can't get himself better than a minimum wage job thinks he's smarter than everyone else?

What a fucking rarity...

Go rape someone, its probably the only thing you're good for.

you're literally just parroting kynes' debunked and retarded talking points nearly verbatim.

you're too stupid to even think or speak for yourself, you rely on a john bircher white nationalist who is still fighting the cold war to do it for you.

a rightie who is constantly bitching about the welfare state who thinks he's smarter than NASA?

what a fucking rarity.

the forecasting has been beyond validated. no matter how many times i post the predictions matching reality, you shitloafs retreat to your bubble of reality denial and willful delusion.

pathetic as fuck, even for you.

 

[Harrekin]

Then you're "rife with" lies

"everyone else" = the tiny minority who doesn't accept ACC? YEP!

Evolution deniers, ACC deniers, holocaust deniers.. aka, you, yeah, I completely exceed you in every aspect of intellect.

You think you're smarter than the tens of thousands of Ph.D's contracted to figure out the problem, you're like that black general in Armageddon who wants to blow up the asteroid by launching nukes at it, I'm the British counterpart calling you a retard from across the table, and the IPCC plays Billy Bobs part telling you to sit down and shut your cock holster because somebody smart is talking

What, you think ACC/climate change is going away? It's going to be a staple in the next presidential election, and I guarantee you, BOTH parties, R & D are going to agree something needs to be done about it, because even though the Republicans are stupid as fuck, they're not nearly as stupid as someone like you who thinks they can get elected by denying it exists.

I've never denied evolution nor the holocaust, and the only definitive statement I've made is in unison with nearly 70% of scientists, which is we are lacking the necessary data.

Regardless of how many times you repeat the lie, that is the position of 70% of the scientists in your famous Cook 06.

Now, shut the fuck up talking and just go get me my fucking Big Mac.

 

[Harrekin]

you're literally just parroting kynes' debunked and retarded talking points nearly verbatim.

you're too stupid to even think or speak for yourself, you rely on a john bircher white nationalist who is still fighting the cold war to do it for you.

a rightie who is constantly bitching about the welfare state who thinks he's smarter than NASA?

what a fucking rarity.

the forecasting has been beyond validated. no matter how many times i post the predictions matching reality, you shitloafs retreat to your bubble of reality denial and willful delusion.

pathetic as fuck, even for you.

Yeah, cos the no recorded warming for circa 20 years really shows how validated your claim is.

I'm not gonna argue with you retards anymore.

Keep Goreging on cock tho.

 

[UncleBuck]

the only definitive statement I've made is in unison with nearly 70% of scientists, which is we are lacking the necessary data.

Regardless of how many times you repeat the lie, that is the position of 70% of the scientists in your famous Cook 06.

nope.

~70% of the papers in cook's study had NOTHING to say about human caused global warming.

~27% or so endorsed the theory of human caused global warming.

~2% or so rejected the theory of human caused global warming.

~1% or so said we do not know or are lacking the data.

your claim only inflated the truth by 7000%, making it not only a lie, but a lie of massive proportions.

you stand with the 1% or so of scientists who see that CO2 has remained below 400 PPM for the last 800,000+ years, suddenly jetted up from 250 PPM to 400 PPM in the last century or so, and says "i don't know, maybe it wasn't caused by us taking 800,000+ years of fossil fuels out of the ground and burning them up in 100 or so years".

that is the stand you take.

of course you take the massive and overwhelming consensus of scientitsts (which has been duplicated over and over again since cook's study) and try to clumsily characterize it as a lie.

you are clearly too stupid to know any better than repeat kynes approved talking points.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I've never denied evolution nor the holocaust, and the only definitive statement I've made is in unison with nearly 70% of scientists, which is we are lacking the necessary data.

Regardless of how many times you repeat the lie, that is the position of 70% of the scientists in your famous Cook 06.

Now, shut the fuck up talking and just go get me my fucking Big Mac.

Like I said, dismiss the Cook study, you're still left with the IPCC and all 34 international science academies who support it, that's 100%, with 0% dissent

100%

LOL

So keep telling me how much smarter you are than 100% of every single international science academy in the entire fuckin' world

You have to be an idiot to be this fuckin retarded..


Also, it doesn't surprise me you're the kind of person who looks down on service workers. I hope you enjoy those spit burgers

 

[UncleBuck]

Yeah, cos the no recorded warming for circa 20 years really shows how validated your claim is.

validation:

it's probably smart of you to stop arguing your failed kynesian talking points (the guy can't even do exponents and you were too much of a pussy to even tell him so), they are only making you look retarded now.