I thought you guys were "winning"...?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yes they are.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
If I change the phrasing to linear regressions are not adequate, would that change your response?
If not, then to what scale are they useful?
I can take the argument back to the ice age and run a linear regression on that, too. It gives a similar result, but the explanation is vastly different.
Ergodicity...that is my bigger topic of exploration, ATM.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
My response would be that it is your opinion and not that of the relevant scientists who authoring and reviewing the studies after conducting research.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
He makes a fair point tho.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
Solar Roads again?
Talk - Action = 0
I don't want to "imagine" it...lay out 1 block in a suburb, and let's see how well they work. Setting up a driveway or a parking lot is not enough. It needs to be tested under live loads in a medium intensity environment. Otherwise I have a great idea for quartz crystal roads that generate electricity by pressure...
give me money...
now.
Talk - Action = 0
I don't want to "imagine" it...lay out 1 block in a suburb, and let's see how well they work. Setting up a driveway or a parking lot is not enough. It needs to be tested under live loads in a medium intensity environment. Otherwise I have a great idea for quartz crystal roads that generate electricity by pressure...
give me money...
now.
Similar threads
