I've never met a woman who was as good as she wanted people to think she was. I suppose the closest any have come to accomplishing that, would be my sister. Mom's not terrible, but the disparity between her actual ways and how she wants to be perceived, is greater. I see this trait repeated endlessly throughout the population (even those i've only observed from afar and haven't met).
I've met plenty who were two-faced, vindictive, irrational and cruel, but wanted to be treated like bottled perfection.
I can't look global about this, because i'm not global, and don't have access to become global. I can only be local. That's why i deliberately referenced "my region." My best guess is "they're not like this everywhere," but i can't know for sure. All the places i'll never reach, and all the people i'll never meet, are beyond my realm of experience. They may as well not exist.
I'm not saying men are better, i'm saying women are not the innocent saints they like people to think they are.
Also, the system is heavily biased in their favor, which is hilariously ironic, considering how feminists constantly reference the alleged "patriarchy," as if they receive zero beneficial special considerations just for being female. They will deny the obvious and insist the absurd, ceaselessly, and anyone who disagrees becomes their enemy, and they will manipulate everything they can reach, to attempt to make that person sorry for infringing their fantasy. At least, the majority of those i've met, in a particular region... which are the only ones i know to relevantly exist, because the rest are out of reach.
I think people are mostly just people, and most people, unfortunately, apparently suck. Most of them are not worth my time, which makes my own life not worth much, since there are very few people with whom i could pleasantly and beneficially interact.
Back on topic... there are Countless glaring inconsistencies, and instances of blatantly illogical un-reasoning, throughout the bible(s). A significant amount is fiction, another significant amount is merely "stolen" from preexisting mythology and folklore (also almost certainly fiction). You've found one of the numerous examples of why it should not be taken as a credible historical document, but as a work of fiction, specifically created for population control, in accordance with the agendas of its creators (i.e. humans). We have no way of knowing whether "Christ's message" is even included in this incredible work. It's entirely possible the man existed, had a message, shared it with those he encountered, but that it did not get accurately represented in Any of the stories, by anyone who composed the books. It's possible his intent was deliberately obscured by people who wanted to use his "character" to push their own message, or even that those who disliked him or what he stood for, deliberately disgraced him by claiming he stood for the opposite of what he actually did. We really have no way of knowing what any of it actually means. But we have plenty of reason and ability to see so many things are clearly wrong with the book, that it should not be taken seriously at all.
"Fiction to Kill for" seems completely bizarre and absurd, to me. We might as well say Harry Potter invented the universe. That would be equivalently irrational.
The idea of "God" came from humans on earth, who did not exist prior to the universe... so it's impossible! Plus there's no actual evidence, only a bunch of stories that obviously don't make sense, and a bunch of people who self-induced psychosis and called it "spiritual contact," or simply hallucinated, and somehow thought that meant "God exists."
Those who wrote the bible sucked at logic, that's why so much of it is contradictory nonsense. They didn't realize their incompetence betrayed their own intentions. Those who continue teaching it as if it were "the gospel truth," apparently also lack logic, so are unable to perceive that, or why, it simply doesn't make sense. Maybe it made sense in the original language, but the translators were incompetent? Who knows.
I just know, someone is going to get all offended by this... but that's not the point, and not the intention. Logic tends to offend those who lack it.
