How much do you think average CEO pay should be compared to workers?

[see4]

That's the idea, jerk-off.

Buck can't take it but he dishes it out, therefore totally justified.

I thought the expression was, "You are what you eat", not, "You are what you do in the shower every morning."

 

[heckler73]

Sure. In basic terms, I mean any positive earnings, in the form of on-hand revenue. For example, if ACME Company earned $10B in 2011 and the CEO took home $1M, then the following year ACME Company only earned $7B, the CEO should not make $1M in salary, he/she should make 70% of that, or $700K. Just throwing out rough numbers there, but you get my drift. And that should include value in Options. CEOs should not get guaranteed compensation, the "regular working man" doesn't why should they? All the people in the company play a role in progressing that company, so why should the CEO get an exponentially better benefit? That shit is wiggity-whack.

How high? Real high
Cause I'm just so fly
A young loveable, huggable type of guy
And everything is to the back with a little slack
'Cause inside-out its wiggida wiggida wiggida wack

 

[UncleBuck]

BS, lie some more, see4

that was edited?

 

[ODanksta]

Michael Bay makes more than 60M a year for making terrible movies. Jim Carey makes that much appearing in terrible movies. Let's not even mention how much F1 drivers make for causing global warming.

It's called the LAW of supply and demand and not the theory of for a reason.

F1 is inventing the most efficient cars on earth right now.

 

[jahbrudda]

You, my poor retarded friend, have no idea what you are talking about. I will force you to look at my erect penis and exclaim, "Would you look at that!"

I don't take orders from a sock puppet with a fat wife, Unclesee4

 

[see4]

I don't take orders from a sock puppet with a fat wife, Unclesee4

The more you yap, the more you look like a total jackass to the rest of us. Stop while you're only slightly behind. Seriously.

 

[heckler73]

I seem to recall See4 knows the difference between a Sig Sauer and Sauerkraut.
I believe Buck has fired a shotgun a few times.
Conclusion: not same person.

 

[see4]

I seem to recall See4 knows the difference between a Sig Sauer and Sauerkraut.
I believe Buck has fired a shotgun a few times.
Conclusion: not same person.

Got rid of my Sig Sauer 2022. First, I don't like .40 anymore, second, with the exception of my HK P30 9mm, I am all about 1911s. Picked up a Dan Wesson Heritage, shoots like a dream. I've been eyeballing a Sig 1911 Custom, I here Sig 1911s are a really nice gun for the money. Same with the Ruger SR1911. I also have a massive erection.

 

[Padawanbater2]

The Actual Wealth Distribution of the U.S., What Americans Think the Wealth Distribution Is, and What They’d Like It to Be

 

[Harrekin]

The Actual Wealth Distribution of the U.S., What Americans Think the Wealth Distribution Is, and What They’d Like It to Be

If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?

 

[see4]

If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?

That's racist.

 

[Padawanbater2]

If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?

If it were as simple as people in poverty simply being "too dumb", it would be a much easier problem to solve, unfortunately that's not the case. America has one of the most educated workforces in the world.

There are more college graduates than ever before today, nearly 75% of waiters/waitresses hold college degrees, and nearly all of these people have student debt

The bottom 20% likely wouldn't keep much of their wealth because poor people have to buy things, and that would stimulate the economy.


Why do you care what poor people do with their money, but not rich people?

 

[Padawanbater2]

 

[Padawanbater2]

Income Inequality v. Wealth