How much do you think average CEO pay should be compared to workers?

How much do you think average CEO pay should be compared to workers?

  • CEO pay should equal workers pay

    Votes: 2 15.4%

  • CEO pay should be 5x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 4 30.8%

  • CEO pay should be 10x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 3 23.1%

  • CEO pay should be 20x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • CEO pay should be 50x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • CEO pay should be 100x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • CEO pay should be 200x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • CEO pay should be 500x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • CEO pay should be > 500x's higher than workers pay

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Total voters
    13
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
Sure. In basic terms, I mean any positive earnings, in the form of on-hand revenue. For example, if ACME Company earned $10B in 2011 and the CEO took home $1M, then the following year ACME Company only earned $7B, the CEO should not make $1M in salary, he/she should make 70% of that, or $700K. Just throwing out rough numbers there, but you get my drift. And that should include value in Options. CEOs should not get guaranteed compensation, the "regular working man" doesn't why should they? All the people in the company play a role in progressing that company, so why should the CEO get an exponentially better benefit? That shit is wiggity-whack.
Click to expand...
How high? Real high
Cause I'm just so fly
A young loveable, huggable type of guy
And everything is to the back with a little slack
'Cause inside-out its wiggida wiggida wiggida wack
 
ODanksta

ODanksta

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Michael Bay makes more than 60M a year for making terrible movies. Jim Carey makes that much appearing in terrible movies. Let's not even mention how much F1 drivers make for causing global warming.

It's called the LAW of supply and demand and not the theory of for a reason.
Click to expand...
F1 is inventing the most efficient cars on earth right now.

 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
You, my poor retarded friend, have no idea what you are talking about. I will force you to look at my erect penis and exclaim, "Would you look at that!"
Click to expand...
I don't take orders from a sock puppet with a fat wife, Unclesee4
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
I seem to recall See4 knows the difference between a Sig Sauer and Sauerkraut.
I believe Buck has fired a shotgun a few times.
Conclusion: not same person.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
I seem to recall See4 knows the difference between a Sig Sauer and Sauerkraut.
I believe Buck has fired a shotgun a few times.
Conclusion: not same person.
Click to expand...
Got rid of my Sig Sauer 2022. First, I don't like .40 anymore, second, with the exception of my HK P30 9mm, I am all about 1911s. Picked up a Dan Wesson Heritage, shoots like a dream. I've been eyeballing a Sig 1911 Custom, I here Sig 1911s are a really nice gun for the money. Same with the Ruger SR1911. I also have a massive erection.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The Actual Wealth Distribution of the U.S., What Americans Think the Wealth Distribution Is, and What They’d Like It to Be

 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
The Actual Wealth Distribution of the U.S., What Americans Think the Wealth Distribution Is, and What They’d Like It to Be

Click to expand...
If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?
Click to expand...
That's racist.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
If the bottom 20% are too dumb to get themselves out of the bottom 20%, how do you honestly expect them to acquire and retain 10% of the wealth distribution?

Wouldn't they just sell their assets for moar crack or whatever?
Click to expand...
If it were as simple as people in poverty simply being "too dumb", it would be a much easier problem to solve, unfortunately that's not the case. America has one of the most educated workforces in the world.

There are more college graduates than ever before today, nearly 75% of waiters/waitresses hold college degrees, and nearly all of these people have student debt

The bottom 20% likely wouldn't keep much of their wealth because poor people have to buy things, and that would stimulate the economy.


Why do you care what poor people do with their money, but not rich people?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top