Yes or no ? Freedom or slavery ?

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Shhh, I'm enjoying the liberal tap dance.

It's the old "you can't tell us what to do, but we can tell you what to do" reasoning.
It's the old " make retarded children illegal and punish the parents in the off chance they should both be killed and there are no other family members who would care for a incestual retarded ginger child with no soul"" bit again.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Retards have a right to live too. Should all parents of disabled kids be locked up for birthing them? Should the kids be put down for "the greater good"?

Why do you feel you have to the right to decide who can and can't marry but get mad when others do it? Are you going to answer this or should I quit asking?
you missed the point because you want to argue defending stupid. If you can avoid having a retarded child by not sleeping with your sister I would suggest you do so. If you have a child that is retarded due to other causes of course you are to love your child no matter. Today I learned on RIU that some person wants to marry his brother... and would fight and argue to marry and fuck their mother and sister. Must be a you people thing. Off to make my world better after hearing this BS.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you missed the point because you want to argue defending stupid. If you can avoid having a retarded child by not sleeping with your sister I would suggest you do so. If you have a chile that is retared due to other causes of course you are to love your child no matter. Today I learned on RIU that some person wants to marry his brother... and would fight and argue to marry and fuck their mother and sister. Must be a you people thing. Off to make my world better after hearing this BS.
Yeah London, except mental retardation isn't a sign of incest. the chance of siblings having babies with ANY kind of defect is only a few percent higher than normal folk. Alcoholics and drug users have a MUCH MUCH higher chance of having fucked up babies.
No one can avoid having a retarded child you moron. Did you know that sickle cell is a birth defect? Do you have sickle cell? I say lock your parents up for that one, it's all their fault, they knew sickle cell runs in the family and they had sex with each other anyway. Sick fuckers!! Then they had you, a blight on humanity because of your genetic lottery that made you retarded, err I mean have sickle cell. Die fucker die.

Love you,

kisses and hugs
NoDrama
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
you missed the point because you want to argue defending stupid. If you can avoid having a retarded child by not sleeping with your sister I would suggest you do so. If you have a child that is retarded due to other causes of course you are to love your child no matter. Today I learned on RIU that some person wants to marry his brother... and would fight and argue to marry and fuck their mother and sister. Must be a you people thing. Off to make my world better after hearing this BS.
In this thread you have said prohibition doesn't work but we need to prohibit this this and this. People who want to prohibit that however, are evil. Your concern over what two or twenty consenting adults do behind the privacy of their own homes is disturbing.

I've used extreme examples to get the point across, but there are some who view gay marriage the same way. We here mostly look at those people as dictatorial.

Yet you still don't see it. This is where collectivism fails. Moral majority and the PC crowd are two sides to the same coin.
 
Last edited:

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Yeah London, except mental retardation isn't a sign of incest. the chance of siblings having babies with ANY kind of defect is only a few percent higher than normal folk. Alcoholics and drug users have a MUCH MUCH higher chance of having fucked up babies.
No one can avoid having a retarded child you moron. Did you know that sickle cell is a birth defect? Do you have sickle cell? I say lock your parents up for that one, it's all their fault, they knew sickle cell runs in the family and they had sex with each other anyway. Sick fuckers!! Then they had you, a blight on humanity because of your genetic lottery that made you retarded, err I mean have sickle cell. Die fucker die.

Love you,

kisses and hugs
NoDrama
I had a 13 year old kid as a pt with sickle cell. He told me it was an evolutionary adaptation to fend off malaria. He was a neat kid, he even dropped the "so I've got that going for me" line.

It's a very painful and crippling condition, but I don't think the law should have stopped his parents from having other children.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
It's a very painful and crippling condition, but I don't think the law should have stopped his parents from having other children.
London does. Which is why I don't think we are hearing from him anymore, back to the drawing board to come up with a better plan than making birth defects illegal.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
London does. Which is why I don't think we are hearing from him anymore, back to the drawing board to come up with a better plan than making birth defects illegal.
It's very telling.

Gay person to social conservative "we should be allowed to marry" Social conservative to gay person "ew no, that's gross"

Incestual person to London "I should be able to marry my mother"
London to incestual person "ew no, that's gross".

Same coin.
 

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
I said airlines have done it, are doing it and will do it.

If you think they catch them all.... Well that's on you.
As a general rule, airlines do not break the regs. The fines are outrageous for any operator who carries passengers, and the FAA watches them closely. Sure, you get some crew that will try to pencil whip checklists, but that's not because the boss told them to.

It's the private pilots you gotta look out for. I can't even count how many times I've seen a pilot do a pre-flight inspection by just climbing into his plane.
 

Choo

Well-Known Member
Back to the original question, no, I would not push the button. I would not look forward to the proliferation of sweat houses and child labor. Normal 60 hour work weeks don't interest me in the least, I don't mind working 60 occasionally but I want it to be my decision. I also like many of the regulations that keep me safe at work and prohibit my employer from forcing me to do something unsafe under the threat of job loss. That being said, I do feel that regulations have gotten out of hand and all regulations need re-evaluation.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Without federal input into marriage, we'd most likely have the vast majority of states recognizing gays marriages.
completely fucking backwards.

in case you didn't notice, voter initiatives for marriage equality FAILED, something like 33 in a row before the first one was ever approved.

what did legalize marriage equality? FEDERAL FUCKING COURTS, dipshit.

please do try to be less stupid. do not try to invert and deny reality for your own bigoted ends.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Marriages that must be government approved.....hmmm... smells like Prima Noche never went away.
compares civil rights to enslavement and rape of white people, compares a marriage certificate to the king fucking your wife on her wedding night...

robroy, you are dumber than all holy fuck and lack historical perspective entirely.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's that group think of "for the greater good". If the majority of citizens think gay marriage will bring on hellfire and the fall of society, then they use a coercive element to make everyone else toe the line.

Blame collectivism.
funny, you support the candidate who supports that collectivism.

or are you still deluding yourself into think rend pawl and obama share the same views on marriage equality?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you feel it's your right to tell stupid people how to live? What ever happened to live and let live?

If someone wants to drink raw milk, I say let them. If someone wants to pray to a spaghetti monster in the sky, that's on them. If someone wants to believe you can borrow your way out of debt, they will soon learn the fallacy.
and if someone wants to fly a plane with your family on it without proper inspections first, let them!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so it's ok to drink and drive UNTIL you hurt someone..got it. crazy ass fuck
i don't think they understand the implications of their own mental retardation.

when they start saying it's OK to drink and drive and fuck your sister, it kinda tells you all you need to know about them.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
In this thread you have said prohibition doesn't work but we need to prohibit this this and this. People who want to prohibit that however, are evil.
yeah, because fucking your sister is kinda like smoking cannabis.

pat yourself on the back for a job well done.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Back to the original question, no, I would not push the button. I would not look forward to the proliferation of sweat houses and child labor.
why do you hate freedom so much?

i should be able to fuck my sister, send our retarded kid to work in the mines, and then drive him home while i'm drunk.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
why do you hate freedom so much?

i should be able to fuck my sister, send our retarded kid to work in the mines, and then drive him home while i'm drunk.
I wouldn't expect you to understand the point.

I also would expect you to be in the same camp saying prohibition doesn't work but we need to prohibit this this and this.

Remember, I think you are the creepy stalker guy who's not very bright.

I'd also like for you to explain why marrying your own brother is wrong without using the moral social conservatives arguments against gay marriage. Your hypocrisy is showing.
 
Top