Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
That's not the point. That wouldn't indoctrinate the people into wanting a communist utopia.Just do it then
Do they need government approval?
That's not the point. That wouldn't indoctrinate the people into wanting a communist utopia.Just do it then
Do they need government approval?
What country in Europe is communist?That's not the point. That wouldn't indoctrinate the people into wanting a communist utopia.
Labor is always one of the biggest costs in a company. You have no idea what you are talking about.Employees wages make up a fraction of the price of a product, the rest goes into marketing, production, distribution, etc. If you raise the minimum wage, prices will also rise at a fraction of the cost of the product, and I, as a consumer, as well as the majority of Americans, will gladly absorb that increase if it means the employees of the company providing the product receive a living wage, especially if it means the savings to the American taxpayer are that significant.
Higher wages, lower taxes, seems like a win win to me, but I'm interested in hearing your opposition to said proposition..
Damn you ninja'd that pretty good, sorry I didn't see it before my reply.Labor is always one of the biggest costs in a company. You have no idea what you are talking about.
He wont believe either of us anyway. We are not scientists... ;]Damn you ninja'd that pretty good, sorry I didn't see it before my reply.
Are you high? Where did I say anything about Europe?What country in Europe is communist?
Umm no, a single person in 2 years time costs more than a new spanking $120,000 farm implement.Employees wages make up a fraction of the price of a product
Labor is always one of the biggest costs in a company. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Labour accounts for up to 45% of any business's expenses, you dumb lefty fuck.
Of the three of you, at least NoDrama posted a link to a citation. From the link;Umm no, a single person in 2 years time costs more than a new spanking $120,000 farm implement.
Obviously you have not heard of China, India, or any other nation that most manufacturing jobs have moved to. Why? Do you think its because of the better weather or something? No, it is because of reduced labor costs. Labor is THE MOST EXPENSIVE THING IN MANUFACTURING!! PERIOD!!
http://www.bcg.com/media/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?id=tcm:12-104216
1/3rd of large manufacturing left in the USA wants to move to China, know why? LABOR COSTS!!
LOL1.25%-1.4% seems like somewhat of a far cry from your 45% total, would you happen to have a citation for that?
no need to go 3000 miles, psycho rabbit. we can look at the BLS numbers right here at home.Socialist European countries already prove what happens to the price of goods compared to take home pay.
Of the three of you, at least NoDrama posted a link to a citation. From the link;
"More than a third of U.S.-based manufacturing executives at companies with sales greater than $1 billion are planning to bring back production to the United States from China or are considering it, according to a new survey by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Decision makers at 106 companies across a broad range of industries responded to the survey, which BCG conducted in late February. Thirty-seven percent said they plan to reshore manufacturing operations or are “actively considering” it. That response rate rose to 48 percent among executives at companies with $10 billion or more in revenues—a third of the sample.
The top factors cited as driving future decisions on production locations: labor costs (57 percent), product quality (41 percent), ease of doing business (29 percent), and proximity to customers (28 percent). In addition, 92 percent said they believe that labor costs in China “will continue to escalate,” and 70 percent agreed that “sourcing in China is more costly than it looks on paper.”
...Not long ago, many companies regarded China as the low-cost default option for manufacturing,” observed Michael Zinser, a BCG partner who leads the firm’s manufacturing work in the Americas. “This survey shows that companies are coming to the conclusion surprisingly fast that the U.S. is becoming more competitive when the total costs of manufacturing are accounted for."
From MIT;
"The costs to this point (basic salary, employment taxes and benefits) are typically in the 1.25 to 1.4 times base salary range- e.g. the cost range for a $50,000/year employee might $62,500 to $70,000. Unless you are hiring traveling salespeople, you need to provide some physical space to house the new employee."
http://web.mit.edu/e-club/hadzima/how-much-does-an-employee-cost.html
The US is lowering labor costs, that's why 57% of companies are likely to return over the next decade57% say labor costs are an issue. You seemed to gloss over that part...
So, if we raise labor costs in USA then what do you think employers will do??? The answer is not *hire more Americans*
You think labour costs are less than 2% of a company's overall costs?1.25%-1.4% seems like somewhat of a far cry from your 45% total, would you happen to have a citation for that?
The US is lowering labor costs, that's why 57% of companies are likely to return over the next decade
So, if we lower labor costs in the USA then what do you think employers will do??? Hire more employees, raise wages, and/or absorb the extra margins back into the company.
Like I said, myself and the majority of Americans are willing to absorb any increases in price if it means American workers earn a living wage.
Clearly it depends on the size of the company what ratio you would end up with, with larger companies having smaller ratiosYou think labour costs are less than 2% of a company's overall costs?
Its blindingly obvious why you work a shitty minimum wage job now.