‘Don’t Let Anybody Tell You’ That Businesses Create Jobs.

[UncleBuck]

Costs do not go down as government controls increase oh smoke and mirrors worshipper. That's ridiculous.

yes they do, all the empirical evidence shows us this.

 

[Rob Roy]

Anyone can go back through beenthere's posts and easily see we are two different people, it's not even close.
You just like to call people who troll you back, a previously banned member in hopes they will get banned, I've never messaged a single mod about you continuously breaking the rules, you can't say the same.

I settle my battles myself, no whiner here,

You are okay in my book, but this back and forth reminds me of when Bubbles stole the Patrick Swazy train and had to be called "Scorpion" for awhile. Sorry....the weed is my excuse.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why do you continue to try to portray me as a previously banned member?

because the admin said you are.

and because i have common sense and can clearly tell that you are beenthere.

 

[UncleBuck]

You are okay in my book

of course he is, he cites jared taylor and victor thorn. i'm sure you are enamored of anyone like that.

 

[Rob Roy]

yes they do, all the empirical evidence shows us this.

You may be confusing cost and retail price. You have confused the floor with the shitter before so anything is possible.

Also you disregard what I've said because you don't comprehend it.

Consumer prices go down when more entities compete for their customer dollars. Just like when you sell your weed and other suppliers are out....you can get more for it. When everybody has weed to sell....guess what happens to price?

 

[Rob Roy]

because the admin said you are.

and because i have common sense and can clearly tell that you are beenthere.

I'm not Bubbles.....I'm Scorpion!

 

[Rob Roy]

of course he is, he cites jared taylor and victor thorn. i'm sure you are enamored of anyone like that.

You're okay in my book and you shit on floors and don't know your ass from your elbow about economics.

 

[NoDrama]

yes they do, all the empirical evidence shows us this.

All that your graph proves is that Americans tend to spend more on Healthcare than people from a select few other nations. It doesn't prove anything about government controls making costs go down or increasing efficiency.

 

[UncleBuck]

You may be confusing cost and retail price.

you're the confused one.

that graph lists per capita expenditures on health care.

as government control goes up, prices go down. that directly contradicts what you are saying.

your bullshit rhetoric falls apart when facing reality.

 

[Rob Roy]

All that your graph proves is that Americans tend to spend more on Healthcare than people from a select few other nations. It doesn't prove anything about government controls making costs go down or increasing efficiency.

Good point. Nor does it prove that government intervention lowers costs or prices. It might prove the opposite though.

His first mistake was assuming that by reducing the number of service providers via coercion based regulation that the result is a "free market".

His second mistake was not understanding supply and demand.

His third mistake was thinking Bubbles was really Scorpion, when it's obvious they are two distinctly separate people.

 

[UncleBuck]

Good point. Nor does it prove that government intervention lowers costs or prices. It might prove the opposite though.

then why do nations with more government intervention have lower per capita health care expenditures?

 

[Rob Roy]

you're the confused one.

that graph lists per capita expenditures on health care.

as government control goes up, prices go down. that directly contradicts what you are saying.

your bullshit rhetoric falls apart when facing reality.

I don't read much of your charts and graphs. They bore me.


Costs (retail price) to a consumer goes down when more service providers enter a given market...are you really going to deny that?

 

[Rob Roy]

then why do nations with more government intervention have lower per capita health care expenditures?

Because when there is more weed around you get to charge more for it ? No...wait.

I'm laughing at you, very hard.

 

[UncleBuck]

I don't read much of your charts and graphs. They bore me.

so you choose to remain willfully ignorant. got it.

Costs (retail price) to a consumer goes down when more service providers enter a given market...are you really going to deny that?

you have provided zero evidence of that, whereas i have provided tons of evidence that more government intervention results in lower per capita health care costs.

you want to just go on denying reality because it doesn't conform to your magical utopia?

 

[UncleBuck]

Because when there is more weed around you get to charge more for it ? No...wait.

I'm laughing at you, very hard.

why does england have greater government intervention into health care and also lower costs then?

 

[Rob Roy]

so you choose to remain willfully ignorant. got it.




you have provided zero evidence of that, whereas i have provided tons of evidence that more government intervention results in lower per capita health care costs.

you want to just go on denying reality because it doesn't conform to your magical utopia?

Okay dunce cap. Every weed grower in Cali has a bumper crop, there's fucking weed everywhere....what happens to the sale price....does it go up or down when supply increases and demand remains the same?


I think you are boring me now. I'm going to go smoke a giant fattie to see if I can get stupified and better understand you.

Feel free to draw a penis picture or something while I'm gone off sparking one up.

 

[UncleBuck]

Okay dunce cap. Every weed grower in Cali has a bumper crop, there's fucking weed everywhere....what happens to the sale price....does it go up or down when supply increases and demand remains the same?


I think you are boring me now. I'm going to go smoke a giant fattie to see if I can get stupified and better understand you.

Feel free to draw a penis picture or something while I'm gone off sparking one up.

we're talking about health care, not cali weed.

why is it that nations with more government control and intervention are more efficient and cost less?

 

[Rob Roy]

we're talking about health care, not cali weed.

why is it that nations with more government control and intervention are more efficient and cost less?

So you are saying that in a supply and demand situation or other economic happenings that government can sprinkle magic dust and it becomes exempt from the results?

The Soviet Union called and said supply and command is not a real term Ricky....now go grow some dope, maybe Lucy will bang you in the back of the car.

 

[NoDrama]

then why do nations with more government intervention have lower per capita health care expenditures?

Because in those countries they don't let a 93 year old dieing from terminal pancreatic cancer the option of a new untried $3 million operation. They just let them die.

Also, those countries all have more doctors per capita than in the US. France has 3.4, Italy is 3.5, Spain is 4.0, Germany is 3.8 all vs US at 2.5. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS

What do you know, supply and demand. Huh, whodathunk it?

Also those other countries have long waits for non life saving surgeries and do not get the benefit of cutting edge technology either.

 

[Choo]

yes they do, all the empirical evidence shows us this.

Perhaps per capita spending is lower in other countries because unemployment is HIGHER WAY HIGHER and they have a lot less to spend..

Europe is facing the possibiity of a far greater crisis called DEFLATION ( one of the reasons gas prices dropped here is that other countries aren't buying oil because their economies are hurting). These are the over regulated countries you point to as utopian models. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21593497-euro-area-getting-perilously-close-deflation-danger-zone
Anyway, your empirical evidence is crap!
And may I remind you that deflation was one of the major causes of The Great Depression.