New Evidence in Michael Brown Case

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I must admit you can admit error and you honor bets. Too bad you follow "the wrong" on this site
Click to expand...

Says the person that thinks it is okay to initiate force to make people pay for things they do not want and do not use.


....and why is your nose growing Pinocchio?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Says the person that thinks it is okay to initiate force to make people pay for things they do not want and do not use.


....and why is your nose growing Pinocchio?
Click to expand...
Why do you hate Social Security ??? Do you hate old people and the disabled
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
What did the coroner say about none of the bullets hitting him in the back?

Racist coroner must've turned the bullets around, fixed the holes in his back and made ones in his front.
Click to expand...
Kinda hard for you to understand getting shot at versus being shot. Must be a drunk Irish thing
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Why do you hate Social Security ??? Do you hate old people and the disabled
Click to expand...
No. I sponsor aid to old people, poor and the disabled as a private individual, I don't try to make others go along with it thru violent threats like you do though. Why do you hate freedom of choice?

I think people should be able to chose as individuals how they will conduct their lives rather than having it choreographed for them by a parasitic bureaucrat or the parasites hierarchical daddy or nanny.

You have something on your lips too, I think it is the masters boot polish.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Kinda hard for you to understand getting shot at versus being shot. Must be a drunk Irish thing
Click to expand...
Yeah cos bullets definitely hit you in the front when you're running away from something.

Must've been those new boomerang rounds, I thought they stopped production because of the somewhat dangerous nature of a bullet returning to it's point of origin.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Tennessee v. Garner should get you started
Best way to learn is to seek knowledge yourself.
Click to expand...
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

Turning around and coming back would pose a threat.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Kinda hard for you to understand getting shot at versus being shot. Must be a drunk Irish thing
Click to expand...
Dorian Johnson said that the cop held Brown by the throat before shooting him.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/michael-brown-shooting/michael-browns-friend-he-was-shot-animal-officer-n179501

Of course the coroner said there was no evidence of that.

Dorian Johnson also said the officer shot him in the back.

Coroner already ruled that out.



http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0


I assume this is the witness Buck is betting all his chips on.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Not so clear cut as you say Chesus. Was Brown posing a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others as he was running away ? If so how
Click to expand...
well, he was 25 feet away with his arms/hands up and "staggering" after being shot at. so he was clearly trying to defeat the bullets in a fit of negro super strength so he could kill that poor innocent white man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top