More conspiracy theory bullshitYour'e full of it, the only thing you or your fellow loons have cited came from a left wing source funded by George Soros
You cited one study that only looks at average surface temperatures for 12 years.I'm tired of providing you scientific evidence that goes against your global warming religion.
NASA is funded by George Soros, it's cute.i've been citing NASA over and over, actually.
you cited idso, who is funded by exxonmobil.
it's cute.
GTFO of America if you don't appreciate the rule of law. 8 independent investigations found climate-gate to be contrived fabricated bullshit from right wing retards like yourself, now you can't accept you were always wrong to begin withNASA is funded by George Soros, it's cute.
are you trying to marginalize yourself as the laughing stock of this forum (again), beenthere?NASA is funded by George Soros, it's cute.
NASA’s Hansen Mentioned in Soros Foundations Annual Reportare you trying to marginalize yourself as the laughing stock of this forum (again), beenthere?
more newsbusters. that's grand.NASA’s Hansen Mentioned in Soros Foundations Annual Report
As NewsBuster Jake Gontesky reported, an editorial in Investor's Business Daily Monday claimed one of billionaire leftist George Soros's foundations gave $720,000 in 2006 to the head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, James Hansen. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/26/nasa-s-hansen-mentioned-soros-foundations-annual-report#sthash.I8N1yDLl.dpuf
The position you hold has driven precisely ZERO meaningful policy. Unless you count a few million dollars to form a task force to devise a program to possibly train people to install and repair solar panels that almost no one is buying. And yet, we (the skeptics) have ground your little Eco-Loon train to a standstill. WE are driving the absence of policy and its delicious.I love the fact that you have absolutely no voice in government or policy, and everything we've said and the position we hold drives policy! Everyone in any significant or important position making the policy supports the IPCC, and all you can do is kick and scream and invent new conspiracy theories and bitch on the internet because nobody will listen to your horse shit in real life
That's what's fuckin' cute!
Your'e full of it, the only thing you or your fellow loons have cited came from a left wing source funded by George Soros
and I suppose science is a left wing conspiracy...NASA is funded by George Soros, it's cute.
What do you define as "extreme variation"?please also provide a link with your citation
They only measured average surface air temperature over a 12 year period and as has been explained to you repeatedly, these averages conceal extreme variation and completely ignore warming of the ocean.
Oh yeah? My Dad can beat up your Dad!The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the University of Alaska, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).[1] Designed and built by BAE...
Fucking idiots, you don't even know what you are arguing about.
When you study averages you tend to ignore extreme variation such as say, a record low or high temperature. Two cold days easily make up for an extremely hot day and then some. So when I say that a study used only average surface atmosphere temperature, it is a very small data set.What do you define as "extreme variation"?