So instead of you getting me the info I was asking if you could elaborate on, or pointing me to something which did, in words I could understand, I went and found it my damned self.
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRD3456145
Describes the synthetic process, some common non-synthetic processes and why alkali extracts may be preferred, in good detail without a piss-fest. Guess why the alkali-extracts are preferred? For more complete extraction of the plant growth substances (that you figured would destroy them). Now I wonder why the evil seaweed companies would lobby for such a horrendous measure.
One thing I can do at least is admit
I was wrong about something (unlike either of you), like how I assumed either KOH\NaOH might be mined, when more typically it turns out to be from electrolysis of muriate of potash (KCl, which is from ore). It can also be a byproduct of making hydrochloric acid. However, lye has been used in a wide variety of processes from foodstuffs to soap making for a very long time. Hundreds of years ago it was derived from wood ashes.
Still, just because the 'NOP\OMRI regulations' allow SWC's to be made
with processes that use KOH\NaOH, simply doesn't mean:
- That they're all made this way (because there are "NON SYNTHETIC EXTRACTS", which are allowed and why wouldn't they be)
- That any significant quantity of KOH\NaOH even remains in the finished product (for products that actually ARE made that way)
- That doing so chemically alters the compounds in the kelp, in fact such extracts are specifically not allowed, nor are KOH extracts to be blended "with synthetically extracted humic acid derivatives" (but who cares?)
- That products which ARE made that way are necessarily bad- a Draino MSDS doesn't demonstrate that, and why the hell not just provide the actual MSDS for lye itself? Were you not keen enough to, or did you just figure it looked worse as a component of big, bad 'drain cleaner'? ...Bokashi?
- If these extracts have more PGRs, are more complete extractions, why isn't that a "good" thing?
- What benefit is it to the evil seaweed companies to taint their products with caustic chemicals they have to buy, which actually destroy their product and make it less effective?
To recap, I sorta feel as if I am being attacked for basically saying there are different ways to grow (and I have a potty mouth). Then you run with this particular bit about the seaweed extract with horrible caustic chemicals and the phosphoric acid like I am supposed to know wth you are talking about, just to rant about this particular class of seaweed extracts that could be made employing KOH\NaOH (stuff made in labs), which you suppose must destroy all the PGRs, or whatever...
Flipping out because KOH\NaOH apparently are the
ONLY synthetic substances allowed [to be used in the extraction process]. I have to go find the information myself and go figure, it might actually facilitate the extraction to help remove more of the plant-derived plant growth hormones and substances unique to kelp. The only thing stopping the biological activity in the product is pH, and it really would be best if those compounds not decay before they reach the consumer. It's a cluster fuck. But for aforementioned points, I digress.
I dunno. I don't give a fuck about conspiracy theories, or delusional people (other than myself) who fly off the handle over differing perspectives.